What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates.
Attention
Event-related potentials
Visual search
Working memory
Journal
Neuropsychologia
ISSN: 1873-3514
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychologia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0020713
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 03 2020
16 03 2020
Historique:
received:
21
09
2019
revised:
02
02
2020
accepted:
03
02
2020
pubmed:
8
2
2020
medline:
28
5
2021
entrez:
8
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To-be-attended information can be specified either with positive cues (I'll be wearing a blue shirt) or with negative cues (I won't be wearing a red shirt). Numerous experiments have found that positive cues help search more than negative cues. Given that negative cues produce smaller benefits compared to positive cues, it stands to reason that searchers may choose to use positive templates instead of negative templates if given the opportunity. Here, we evaluate this possibility with behavioral measures as well as by directly measuring the formation of positive and negative templates with event-related potentials. Analysis of the contralateral delay activity (CDA) elicited by cues revealed that positive and negative templates relied on working memory to the same extent, even when negative working memory templates could have been circumvented by relying on long-term memories of target colors. Whereas the CDA did not discriminate positive and negative templates, a CNV-like potential did, suggesting cognitive differences between positive and negative templates beyond visual working memory. However, when both positive and negative information were presented in each cue, participants preferred to make use of the positive cues, as indicated by a CDA contralateral to the positive color in negative cue blocks, and a lack of search benefits for positive- and negative-color cues relative to positive-color cues alone. Our results show that searchers elect to selectively encode only positive information into visual working memory when both positive and negative information are available.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32032582
pii: S0028-3932(20)30048-8
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107376
pmc: PMC9335948
mid: NIHMS1568815
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107376Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : P30 EY008126
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY019882
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY025275
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH110378
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
Yale J Biol Med. 2019 Mar 25;92(1):103-113
pubmed: 30923477
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Apr;44(4):645-662
pubmed: 29035075
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 May;139(2):247-65
pubmed: 20438251
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Aug;24(8):2022-35
pubmed: 23448876
Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):34-52
pubmed: 8121959
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):887-98
pubmed: 22760886
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):437-43
pubmed: 22795563
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1450-64
pubmed: 24730738
Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):485-96
pubmed: 8008550
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124
pubmed: 28375769
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1353-64
pubmed: 26098120
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Sep;26(9):2042-54
pubmed: 24666133
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Nov;74(8):1590-605
pubmed: 22893004
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1253-1261
pubmed: 30644056
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;60:29-38
pubmed: 24878275
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jul;44(7):992-1011
pubmed: 29629781
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2019 Dec 1;28(6):600-606
pubmed: 33758472
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):113-22
pubmed: 22004194
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1190-6
pubmed: 26191616
Biol Psychol. 1995 Oct;41(2):183-202
pubmed: 8534791
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 22;31(25):9315-22
pubmed: 21697381
Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):523-47
pubmed: 2247540
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82
pubmed: 20853993
Neuroreport. 2016 Mar 23;27(5):345-9
pubmed: 26872100
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):117-29
pubmed: 15925498
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Nov;12(11):418-24
pubmed: 18799345
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):327-34
pubmed: 21665518
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Aug;16(3):459-78
pubmed: 2144564
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2650-64
pubmed: 21254796
J Vis. 2017 Jun 1;17(6):13
pubmed: 28637052
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jun;27(6):790-8
pubmed: 27056975
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):730-7
pubmed: 17563233
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Mar;44(3):440-464
pubmed: 28933906
Vis cogn. 2019;27(5-8):452-466
pubmed: 32952433
Nature. 2001 Jun 21;411(6840):953-6
pubmed: 11418860
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Oct;190:85-94
pubmed: 30036747
Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58
pubmed: 2756067
Cortex. 2018 Nov;108:279-282
pubmed: 30245200
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;31(12):1873-1894
pubmed: 31418334
Psychol Sci. 2011 Feb;22(2):212-5
pubmed: 21193780
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):363-77
pubmed: 17469973
J Neurosci. 2012 Aug 1;32(31):10725-36
pubmed: 22855820
Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):467-73
pubmed: 11202491
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):1070-1082
pubmed: 28916853
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1000-14
pubmed: 7964526
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):132-8
pubmed: 16724780
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4
pubmed: 22468723
Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1553-8
pubmed: 21145332
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Aug;44(8):1199-1215
pubmed: 29708384
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;29(7):1185-1189
pubmed: 29750594
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):419-33
pubmed: 2527952
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Oct;75(7):1330-5
pubmed: 23918552
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):871-8
pubmed: 22696250
Psychol Res. 2009 May;73(3):317-26
pubmed: 18665392
Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51
pubmed: 15085132
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Dec;28(12):1947-1963
pubmed: 27458746
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2031-48
pubmed: 27188652
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):639-46
pubmed: 22528872
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 13;112(2):625-30
pubmed: 25548192
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145910
pubmed: 26717307
Cogn Psychol. 2016 May;86:87-111
pubmed: 26970605
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Sep-Oct;88(5):408-20
pubmed: 7691565
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65
pubmed: 17002535
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):217-25
pubmed: 20643386