Birth Control Connect: A randomized trial of an online group to disseminate contraceptive information.
Communication
Contraception
IUD
Internet
Online
Social
Journal
Contraception
ISSN: 1879-0518
Titre abrégé: Contraception
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0234361
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
26
07
2019
revised:
18
12
2019
accepted:
20
01
2020
pubmed:
8
2
2020
medline:
16
7
2021
entrez:
8
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to test whether participation in an online group including IUD users influenced IUD-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among IUD non-users, as a proof-of-concept evaluation of information dissemination for less commonly used or novel contraceptives. We conducted a blinded, randomized controlled trial on the effect of online communication with IUD users within an online program called Birth Control Connect. Participants were women age 18-45 living in the United States who had never used an IUD. We invited participants randomized to the intervention to join two-week, nine-member discussion groups including four satisfied IUD users and five IUD non-users; we invited control participants to groups including nine IUD non-users. We performed chi-squared tests on IUD knowledge, information-seeking, informational support and use in immediate post-surveys, and t-tests comparing change in IUD attitudes and frequency of logins to discussion groups. We invited 488 IUD non-users and enrolled them into 70 groups between October 2015 and April 2016. We found increased positive attitudes towards the IUD in the intervention arm (0.65-point increase between pre- and post-surveys, versus 0.05 mean change for control arm, p = 0.03 for hormonal IUD, with a trend in the same direction for the non-hormonal IUD). Informational support also increased, with 70.3% of intervention arm participants self-reporting that they gained a better idea of what the IUD would be like, compared to 51.3% in control arm (p < 0.01). Of intervention participants, 63.3% versus 51.3% of control participants reported gaining new information from their group (p = 0.03). There were no differences in correct responses to knowledge items or information-seeking between groups. Online exposure to IUD users increased positive attitudes toward the IUD and informational support for decision-making about the IUD among non-users. Online spaces provide a promising environment for the exchange of accurate, useful contraceptive information based on real user experiences. Interventions aiming to harness social communication through structured online conversations (e.g., on existing social media platforms) about user experiences with lesser-known contraceptive methods such as the IUD may be worthwhile.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32032641
pii: S0010-7824(20)30033-0
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.01.014
pmc: PMC7234911
mid: NIHMS1566169
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contraceptive Agents, Female
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
376-383Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR001870
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : P2C HD044964
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
Stud Fam Plann. 1997 Dec;28(4):290-307
pubmed: 9431650
Contraception. 2018 Jul;98(1):4-7
pubmed: 29545022
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003 Jun;29(2):58-68
pubmed: 12783769
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Oct;49(4):357-62
pubmed: 21939865
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):361-8
pubmed: 19275991
Sci Commun. 1995 Mar;16(3):242-73
pubmed: 12319357
Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):14-21
pubmed: 29038071
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Jun;29(3):259-64
pubmed: 26477942
Cult Health Sex. 2010 May;12(4):373-86
pubmed: 20169479
J Health Commun. 2001 Oct-Dec;6(4):303-22
pubmed: 11783665
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Nov;71(9):1584-92
pubmed: 20869146
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun;105(6):1206-12
pubmed: 25880942
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 01;3:CD012521
pubmed: 30818414
J Health Commun. 2017 Mar;22(3):223-233
pubmed: 28248623
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Mar;52(3):293-300
pubmed: 23299012
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0183655
pubmed: 28832621
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):703-715
pubmed: 30342633
Matern Child Health J. 2000 Dec;4(4):233-9
pubmed: 11272343
Contraception. 2017 Oct;96(4):221-226
pubmed: 28756187
Contraception. 2019 Aug;100(2):165-171
pubmed: 31028752
Contraception. 2004 Oct;70(4):299-305
pubmed: 15451334
Circulation. 2013 Apr 30;127(17):1829-36
pubmed: 23630086
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):565.e1-565.e12
pubmed: 30763545
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009 Apr;22(2):97-104
pubmed: 19345915
Contraception. 2018 Dec;98(6):467-470
pubmed: 29842865
Prev Sci. 2017 Feb;18(2):141-151
pubmed: 27492421
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):141-8
pubmed: 24894575
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):171-5
pubmed: 24861029
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Oct;47(4):374-80
pubmed: 20864007