How men receive and utilise partner support when trying to change their diet and physical activity within a men's weight management programme.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 17 09 2019
accepted: 14 01 2020
entrez: 9 2 2020
pubmed: 9 2 2020
medline: 30 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The impacts of interventions designed to change health behaviours are potentially affected by the complex social systems in which they are embedded. This study uses Scottish data to explore how men receive and utilise partner support when attempting to change dietary practices and physical activity within the context of Football Fans in Training (FFIT), a gender-sensitised weight management and healthy living programme for men who are overweight/obese. Separate semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 20 men and their cohabiting female partners (total n = 40), 3-12 months after the men had completed FFIT. Data were thematically analysed and individual interviews were combined for dyadic analysis. Men's and women's accounts suggested variations in men's need for, and utilisation of, partner support in order to make changes to dietary practices and physical activity. There were also differences in descriptions of women's involvement in men's behaviour changes. Typologies were developed categorising men as 'resolute', 'reliant'/'receptive' and 'non-responsive' and women as 'very involved', 'partially involved' and 'not involved'. Men were more reliant, and women more involved, in changes to dietary practices compared to physical activity. The role of partner involvement in promoting men's behaviour change seemed contingent on men's resoluteness, or their reliance on the partner support. These results highlight how interactions between men's resoluteness/reliance on cohabiting female partners and the partners' involvement impact the extent to which female partners influence men's changes to dietary practices and physical activity following a weight loss intervention. Understanding this interaction could increase the impact of health interventions aimed at one individual's behaviour by considering other family members' roles in facilitating those changes. The typologies developed for this study might contribute towards the development of behaviour change theories within the cohabiting couple context.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The impacts of interventions designed to change health behaviours are potentially affected by the complex social systems in which they are embedded. This study uses Scottish data to explore how men receive and utilise partner support when attempting to change dietary practices and physical activity within the context of Football Fans in Training (FFIT), a gender-sensitised weight management and healthy living programme for men who are overweight/obese.
METHODS METHODS
Separate semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 20 men and their cohabiting female partners (total n = 40), 3-12 months after the men had completed FFIT. Data were thematically analysed and individual interviews were combined for dyadic analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Men's and women's accounts suggested variations in men's need for, and utilisation of, partner support in order to make changes to dietary practices and physical activity. There were also differences in descriptions of women's involvement in men's behaviour changes. Typologies were developed categorising men as 'resolute', 'reliant'/'receptive' and 'non-responsive' and women as 'very involved', 'partially involved' and 'not involved'. Men were more reliant, and women more involved, in changes to dietary practices compared to physical activity. The role of partner involvement in promoting men's behaviour change seemed contingent on men's resoluteness, or their reliance on the partner support.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These results highlight how interactions between men's resoluteness/reliance on cohabiting female partners and the partners' involvement impact the extent to which female partners influence men's changes to dietary practices and physical activity following a weight loss intervention. Understanding this interaction could increase the impact of health interventions aimed at one individual's behaviour by considering other family members' roles in facilitating those changes. The typologies developed for this study might contribute towards the development of behaviour change theories within the cohabiting couple context.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32033544
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8213-z
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-8213-z
pmc: PMC7006401
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

199

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_13027
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12017/14
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : SPHSU14
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council (UK)
ID : [MC_ST_U14024]
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : SPHSU12
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12017/12
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar;44(3):332-344
pubmed: 29121824
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Dec;23(12):2319-20
pubmed: 26523739
Soc Sci Med. 2000 May;50(10):1385-401
pubmed: 10741575
Health Psychol. 2013 Apr;32(4):447-55
pubmed: 22563755
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Aug;112(8):1188-200
pubmed: 22818727
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Nov;32(11):1678-84
pubmed: 18762804
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:46-55
pubmed: 27494239
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Mar-Apr;44(2):123-31
pubmed: 22192951
Lancet. 2014 Apr 5;383(9924):1211-21
pubmed: 24457205
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):156-62
pubmed: 2002132
Soc Sci Med. 2011 May;72(9):1499-506
pubmed: 21497972
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar;175(3):385-92
pubmed: 25599511
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Aug;10(4):633-44
pubmed: 26715587
Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):351-77
pubmed: 3068205
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008 Mar-Apr;40(2):80-8
pubmed: 18314083
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):277-96
pubmed: 26854092
Am J Mens Health. 2012 Nov;6(6):453-61
pubmed: 22516565
BMJ. 2014 May 14;348:g2646
pubmed: 25134100
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Mar;62(6):1369-80
pubmed: 16146666
Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):52-62
pubmed: 21319484
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;31(3):416-27
pubmed: 15657456
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Jan 5;52(1):65-76
pubmed: 28710666
Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1642-55
pubmed: 20663940
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Apr;13(4):544-9
pubmed: 19706214
Acad Pediatr. 2009 Nov-Dec;9(6):410-4
pubmed: 19945075
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;163:89-97
pubmed: 27421075
Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Jan;34(1):136-45
pubmed: 19859077
Am J Mens Health. 2011 Mar;5(2):177-87
pubmed: 20798140
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):1330
pubmed: 30509224
Ann Behav Med. 2004 Apr;27(2):107-16
pubmed: 15053018
J Obes. 2013;2013:297268
pubmed: 24083021
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2017 Mar;9(1):36-59
pubmed: 28332338
Obes Rev. 2014 Dec;15(12):983-95
pubmed: 25428600
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;189:53-62
pubmed: 28783502
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
Psychol Bull. 2006 Mar;132(2):249-68
pubmed: 16536643
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(2):387-95
pubmed: 16011867
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(35):v-vi, xxiii-xxix, 1-424
pubmed: 24857516
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Jul;12(7):695-707
pubmed: 20513695
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Jan-Feb;10(1):70-84
pubmed: 25937165
Health Psychol. 2016 May;35(5):514-7
pubmed: 26462057
Health Psychol. 1999 Jan;18(1):63-71
pubmed: 9925047
BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 16;13:232
pubmed: 23496915
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907
pubmed: 29937585
Sociol Health Illn. 2009 Mar;31(2):215-28
pubmed: 19220802
Obes Rev. 2005 Feb;6(1):67-85
pubmed: 15655039
Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;40(Pt 4):471-99
pubmed: 11795063
Appetite. 2015 Jan;84:113-9
pubmed: 25305464
Popul Health Metr. 2012 Nov 20;10(1):22
pubmed: 23167948
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Nov;24(6):827-39
pubmed: 25807856

Auteurs

Sheela Tripathee (S)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. sheela.tripathee@abdn.ac.uk.

Helen Sweeting (H)

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, UK.

Stephanie Chambers (S)

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, UK.

Alice Maclean (A)

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH