Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the diabetes empowerment scale among hospital Serdang type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using exploratory factor analysis.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ psychology
Empowerment
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Malaysia
Male
Middle Aged
Psychometrics
/ instrumentation
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Self Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ standards
Translations
Young Adult
Diabetes education
Empowerment
Malaysia
Type 2 diabetes
Journal
Health and quality of life outcomes
ISSN: 1477-7525
Titre abrégé: Health Qual Life Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153626
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Feb 2020
07 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
07
03
2019
accepted:
29
01
2020
entrez:
9
2
2020
pubmed:
9
2
2020
medline:
5
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study was initiated to examine the psychometric components of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES) by translating and validating the scale into the Malay language (DES-M) which is the main language spoken in Malaysia. This study can determine the level of empowerment among diabetic patients towards diabetes management. In addition, the reliability and validity of the DES-M was also demonstrated. A total of 151 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited (between June 2016 and October 2016) to complete sets of questionnaires, which were DES-M, the Malay versions of the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) for Adults and Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities Questionnaire (SDSCA). Confirmatory and Exploratory factor analysis (CFA and EFA) were carried out to determine the factor structures of the DES-M. There were 100 males and 51 females with ages ranging from 19 to 81 years old (55 ± 13) included in this study. The instrument displayed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α =0.920) and the respective coefficients ranged from 0.65-0.84. Discriminant validity showed adequate correlations ranged from 0.257-0.744. Concurrent validity with SDSCA (Pearson's correlation = 0.313, p = 0.012). Predictive validity with DQOL (B = 0.27, p = 0.016). CFA indicated that four factor model of the DES-M has good fit to the data. This study indicates that the DES-M has a good internal consistency and validity. Therefore, it is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing empowerment score among patients with diabetes in Malaysia. NMRR-16-805-30503 (IIR).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study was initiated to examine the psychometric components of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES) by translating and validating the scale into the Malay language (DES-M) which is the main language spoken in Malaysia. This study can determine the level of empowerment among diabetic patients towards diabetes management. In addition, the reliability and validity of the DES-M was also demonstrated.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 151 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited (between June 2016 and October 2016) to complete sets of questionnaires, which were DES-M, the Malay versions of the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) for Adults and Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities Questionnaire (SDSCA). Confirmatory and Exploratory factor analysis (CFA and EFA) were carried out to determine the factor structures of the DES-M.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were 100 males and 51 females with ages ranging from 19 to 81 years old (55 ± 13) included in this study. The instrument displayed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α =0.920) and the respective coefficients ranged from 0.65-0.84. Discriminant validity showed adequate correlations ranged from 0.257-0.744. Concurrent validity with SDSCA (Pearson's correlation = 0.313, p = 0.012). Predictive validity with DQOL (B = 0.27, p = 0.016). CFA indicated that four factor model of the DES-M has good fit to the data.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study indicates that the DES-M has a good internal consistency and validity. Therefore, it is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing empowerment score among patients with diabetes in Malaysia.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NMRR-16-805-30503 (IIR).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32033609
doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-1280-0
pii: 10.1186/s12955-020-1280-0
pmc: PMC7006206
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23Subventions
Organisme : Fakulti Perubatan dan Sains Kesihatan, Universiti Putra Malaysia
ID : UPM/700-2/1/GP-IPS/2018/9593800
Organisme : Fakulti Perubatan dan Sains Kesihatan, Universiti Putra Malaysia
ID : UPM/800-3/3/1/GPB/2018/9659600
Organisme : Fakulti Perubatan dan Sains Kesihatan, Universiti Putra Malaysia
ID : UPM/SPS/GS48750
Références
Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Jun;21(2):247-52
pubmed: 17559444
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50
pubmed: 10895844
Nurs Res. 2008 Mar-Apr;57(2):101-6
pubmed: 18347481
Health Psychol. 1991;10(1):1-8
pubmed: 2026125
Diabetes Care. 1992 Jan;15(1):90-4
pubmed: 1737547
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Aug 13;11:138
pubmed: 23937988
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Mar;87(3):293-301
pubmed: 20171754
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2013 Jan 19;12(1):6
pubmed: 23497631
Med J Malaysia. 2010 Sep;65(3):180-6
pubmed: 21939164
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Mar;48(3):333-7
pubmed: 20950807
World J Diabetes. 2019 Jul 15;10(7):403-413
pubmed: 31363387
Diabetes Educ. 1991 Jan-Feb;17(1):37-41
pubmed: 1986902
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 09;12:176
pubmed: 25492701
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jun;23(6):739-43
pubmed: 10840988
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012 Aug 02;11(1):4
pubmed: 23497711
J Behav Med. 1980 Mar;3(1):95-116
pubmed: 6995619
Addict Behav. 1996 Jan-Feb;21(1):103-16
pubmed: 8729712
Diabetes Care. 2003 Oct;26(10):2817-21
pubmed: 14514585
Diabetes Care. 1988 Oct;11(9):725-32
pubmed: 3066604
Addict Behav. 1994 Jan-Feb;19(1):1-12
pubmed: 8197887
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Oct;19(19-20):2933-5
pubmed: 20846234
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 18;12:185
pubmed: 25519204
J Behav Med. 1995 Oct;18(5):479-97
pubmed: 8847716
J Transcult Nurs. 2016 Jan;27(1):65-72
pubmed: 24841470
Diabetes Educ. 1992 Mar-Apr;18(2):146-50
pubmed: 1537242