Updated assessment of risks and benefits of dolutegravir versus efavirenz in new antiretroviral treatment initiators in sub-Saharan Africa: modelling to inform treatment guidelines.
Adolescent
Adult
Africa South of the Sahara
Alkynes
Anti-HIV Agents
/ administration & dosage
Benzoxazines
/ administration & dosage
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cyclopropanes
Female
HIV Infections
/ drug therapy
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical
/ prevention & control
Male
Middle Aged
Oxazines
Piperazines
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
/ drug therapy
Pyridones
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Young Adult
Journal
The lancet. HIV
ISSN: 2352-3018
Titre abrégé: Lancet HIV
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101645355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
received:
17
08
2019
revised:
08
11
2019
accepted:
25
11
2019
pubmed:
9
2
2020
medline:
29
8
2020
entrez:
9
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is being considered in several countries in sub-Saharan Africa instead of efavirenz for people initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) because of superior tolerability and a lower risk of resistance emergence. WHO requested updated modelling results for its 2019 Antiretroviral Guidelines update, which was restricted to the choice of dolutegravir or efavirenz in new ART initiators. In response to this request, we modelled the risks and benefits of alternative policies for initial first-line ART regimens. We updated an existing individual-based model of HIV transmission and progression in adults to consider information on the risk of neural tube defects in women taking dolutegravir at time of conception, as well as the effects of dolutegravir on weight gain. The model accounted for drug resistance in determining viral suppression, with consequences for clinical outcomes and mother-to-child transmission. We sampled distributions of parameters to create various epidemic setting scenarios, which reflected the diversity of epidemic and programmatic situations in sub-Saharan Africa. For each setting scenario, we considered the situation in 2018 and compared ART initiation policies of an efavirenz-based regimen in women intending pregnancy, and a dolutegravir-based regimen in others, and a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy. We considered predicted outcomes over a 20-year period from 2019 to 2039, used a 3% discount rate, and a cost-effectiveness threshold of US$500 per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. Considering updated information on risks and benefits, a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen rather than an efavirenz-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, is predicted to bring population health benefits (10 990 DALYs averted per year) and to be cost-saving (by $2·9 million per year), leading to a reduction in the overall population burden of disease of 16 735 net DALYs per year for a country with an adult population size of 10 million. The policy involving ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen in women intending pregnancy was cost-effective in 87% of our setting scenarios and this finding was robust in various sensitivity analyses, including around the potential negative effects of weight gain. In the context of a range of modelled setting scenarios in sub-Saharan Africa, we found that a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, was predicted to bring population health benefits and be cost-effective, supporting WHO's strong recommendation for dolutegravir as a preferred drug for ART initiators. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is being considered in several countries in sub-Saharan Africa instead of efavirenz for people initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) because of superior tolerability and a lower risk of resistance emergence. WHO requested updated modelling results for its 2019 Antiretroviral Guidelines update, which was restricted to the choice of dolutegravir or efavirenz in new ART initiators. In response to this request, we modelled the risks and benefits of alternative policies for initial first-line ART regimens.
METHODS
We updated an existing individual-based model of HIV transmission and progression in adults to consider information on the risk of neural tube defects in women taking dolutegravir at time of conception, as well as the effects of dolutegravir on weight gain. The model accounted for drug resistance in determining viral suppression, with consequences for clinical outcomes and mother-to-child transmission. We sampled distributions of parameters to create various epidemic setting scenarios, which reflected the diversity of epidemic and programmatic situations in sub-Saharan Africa. For each setting scenario, we considered the situation in 2018 and compared ART initiation policies of an efavirenz-based regimen in women intending pregnancy, and a dolutegravir-based regimen in others, and a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy. We considered predicted outcomes over a 20-year period from 2019 to 2039, used a 3% discount rate, and a cost-effectiveness threshold of US$500 per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted.
FINDINGS
Considering updated information on risks and benefits, a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen rather than an efavirenz-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, is predicted to bring population health benefits (10 990 DALYs averted per year) and to be cost-saving (by $2·9 million per year), leading to a reduction in the overall population burden of disease of 16 735 net DALYs per year for a country with an adult population size of 10 million. The policy involving ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen in women intending pregnancy was cost-effective in 87% of our setting scenarios and this finding was robust in various sensitivity analyses, including around the potential negative effects of weight gain.
INTERPRETATION
In the context of a range of modelled setting scenarios in sub-Saharan Africa, we found that a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, was predicted to bring population health benefits and be cost-effective, supporting WHO's strong recommendation for dolutegravir as a preferred drug for ART initiators.
FUNDING
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32035041
pii: S2352-3018(19)30400-X
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30400-X
pmc: PMC7167509
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alkynes
0
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Benzoxazines
0
Cyclopropanes
0
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
0
Oxazines
0
Piperazines
0
Pyridones
0
dolutegravir
DKO1W9H7M1
efavirenz
JE6H2O27P8
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e193-e200Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Lancet HIV. 2016 May;3(5):e221-30
pubmed: 27126489
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Aug 15;78(5):579-588
pubmed: 29771788
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20316
pubmed: 21629735
Lancet HIV. 2019 Feb;6(2):e116-e127
pubmed: 30503325
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):803-815
pubmed: 31339677
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9):614-625
pubmed: 30934067
Lancet Public Health. 2017 May 19;2(6):e277-e285
pubmed: 28626830
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 01;16:457
pubmed: 27582052
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2129-43
pubmed: 23245605
JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):71-82
pubmed: 23280227
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):816-826
pubmed: 31339676
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Dec 15;70(5):515-9
pubmed: 26262777
BMC Public Health. 2007 Nov 13;7:326
pubmed: 17999764
Lancet. 2012 Oct 13;380(9850):1325-30
pubmed: 22884609
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 17;4(3):e001449
pubmed: 31321086
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):827-840
pubmed: 31329379