Updated assessment of risks and benefits of dolutegravir versus efavirenz in new antiretroviral treatment initiators in sub-Saharan Africa: modelling to inform treatment guidelines.


Journal

The lancet. HIV
ISSN: 2352-3018
Titre abrégé: Lancet HIV
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101645355

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2020
Historique:
received: 17 08 2019
revised: 08 11 2019
accepted: 25 11 2019
pubmed: 9 2 2020
medline: 29 8 2020
entrez: 9 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is being considered in several countries in sub-Saharan Africa instead of efavirenz for people initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) because of superior tolerability and a lower risk of resistance emergence. WHO requested updated modelling results for its 2019 Antiretroviral Guidelines update, which was restricted to the choice of dolutegravir or efavirenz in new ART initiators. In response to this request, we modelled the risks and benefits of alternative policies for initial first-line ART regimens. We updated an existing individual-based model of HIV transmission and progression in adults to consider information on the risk of neural tube defects in women taking dolutegravir at time of conception, as well as the effects of dolutegravir on weight gain. The model accounted for drug resistance in determining viral suppression, with consequences for clinical outcomes and mother-to-child transmission. We sampled distributions of parameters to create various epidemic setting scenarios, which reflected the diversity of epidemic and programmatic situations in sub-Saharan Africa. For each setting scenario, we considered the situation in 2018 and compared ART initiation policies of an efavirenz-based regimen in women intending pregnancy, and a dolutegravir-based regimen in others, and a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy. We considered predicted outcomes over a 20-year period from 2019 to 2039, used a 3% discount rate, and a cost-effectiveness threshold of US$500 per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. Considering updated information on risks and benefits, a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen rather than an efavirenz-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, is predicted to bring population health benefits (10 990 DALYs averted per year) and to be cost-saving (by $2·9 million per year), leading to a reduction in the overall population burden of disease of 16 735 net DALYs per year for a country with an adult population size of 10 million. The policy involving ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen in women intending pregnancy was cost-effective in 87% of our setting scenarios and this finding was robust in various sensitivity analyses, including around the potential negative effects of weight gain. In the context of a range of modelled setting scenarios in sub-Saharan Africa, we found that a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, was predicted to bring population health benefits and be cost-effective, supporting WHO's strong recommendation for dolutegravir as a preferred drug for ART initiators. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is being considered in several countries in sub-Saharan Africa instead of efavirenz for people initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) because of superior tolerability and a lower risk of resistance emergence. WHO requested updated modelling results for its 2019 Antiretroviral Guidelines update, which was restricted to the choice of dolutegravir or efavirenz in new ART initiators. In response to this request, we modelled the risks and benefits of alternative policies for initial first-line ART regimens.
METHODS
We updated an existing individual-based model of HIV transmission and progression in adults to consider information on the risk of neural tube defects in women taking dolutegravir at time of conception, as well as the effects of dolutegravir on weight gain. The model accounted for drug resistance in determining viral suppression, with consequences for clinical outcomes and mother-to-child transmission. We sampled distributions of parameters to create various epidemic setting scenarios, which reflected the diversity of epidemic and programmatic situations in sub-Saharan Africa. For each setting scenario, we considered the situation in 2018 and compared ART initiation policies of an efavirenz-based regimen in women intending pregnancy, and a dolutegravir-based regimen in others, and a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy. We considered predicted outcomes over a 20-year period from 2019 to 2039, used a 3% discount rate, and a cost-effectiveness threshold of US$500 per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted.
FINDINGS
Considering updated information on risks and benefits, a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen rather than an efavirenz-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, is predicted to bring population health benefits (10 990 DALYs averted per year) and to be cost-saving (by $2·9 million per year), leading to a reduction in the overall population burden of disease of 16 735 net DALYs per year for a country with an adult population size of 10 million. The policy involving ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen in women intending pregnancy was cost-effective in 87% of our setting scenarios and this finding was robust in various sensitivity analyses, including around the potential negative effects of weight gain.
INTERPRETATION
In the context of a range of modelled setting scenarios in sub-Saharan Africa, we found that a policy of ART initiation with a dolutegravir-based regimen, including in women intending pregnancy, was predicted to bring population health benefits and be cost-effective, supporting WHO's strong recommendation for dolutegravir as a preferred drug for ART initiators.
FUNDING
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32035041
pii: S2352-3018(19)30400-X
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30400-X
pmc: PMC7167509
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Alkynes 0
Anti-HIV Agents 0
Benzoxazines 0
Cyclopropanes 0
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring 0
Oxazines 0
Piperazines 0
Pyridones 0
dolutegravir DKO1W9H7M1
efavirenz JE6H2O27P8

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e193-e200

Subventions

Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

Lancet HIV. 2016 May;3(5):e221-30
pubmed: 27126489
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Aug 15;78(5):579-588
pubmed: 29771788
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20316
pubmed: 21629735
Lancet HIV. 2019 Feb;6(2):e116-e127
pubmed: 30503325
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):803-815
pubmed: 31339677
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9):614-625
pubmed: 30934067
Lancet Public Health. 2017 May 19;2(6):e277-e285
pubmed: 28626830
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 01;16:457
pubmed: 27582052
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2129-43
pubmed: 23245605
JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):71-82
pubmed: 23280227
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):816-826
pubmed: 31339676
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Dec 15;70(5):515-9
pubmed: 26262777
BMC Public Health. 2007 Nov 13;7:326
pubmed: 17999764
Lancet. 2012 Oct 13;380(9850):1325-30
pubmed: 22884609
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 17;4(3):e001449
pubmed: 31321086
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):827-840
pubmed: 31329379

Auteurs

Andrew N Phillips (AN)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: andrew.phillips@ucl.ac.uk.

Loveleen Bansi-Matharu (L)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Francois Venter (F)

Ezintsha, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Diane Havlir (D)

School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Anton Pozniak (A)

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Daniel R Kuritzkes (DR)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Annemarie Wensing (A)

Ezintsha, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Jens D Lundgren (JD)

Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Deenan Pillay (D)

Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, South Africa.

John Mellors (J)

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PN, USA.

Valentina Cambiano (V)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Andreas Jahn (A)

Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Tsitsi Apollo (T)

Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Owen Mugurungi (O)

Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.

David Ripin (D)

Clinton Health Access Initiative, New York, NY, USA.

Juliana Da Silva (J)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Elliot Raizes (E)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Nathan Ford (N)

Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

George K Siberry (GK)

Office of HIV/AIDS, Global Health Bureau, United States Agency for International Development, Arlington, VA, USA.

Ravindra K Gupta (RK)

Cambridge Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Ruanne Barnabas (R)

Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Paul Revill (P)

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

Jennifer Cohn (J)

Elizabeth Glaser Paediatric Health Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.

Alexandra Calmy (A)

HIV/AIDS Unit, Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Silvia Bertagnolio (S)

WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH