A bio-inspired coding (BIC) strategy for cochlear implants.
Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Aged
Cochlear Implantation
/ instrumentation
Cochlear Implants
Correction of Hearing Impairment
/ instrumentation
Electric Stimulation
Evoked Potentials, Auditory
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Noise
/ adverse effects
Perceptual Masking
Persons With Hearing Impairments
/ psychology
Pitch Perception
Recognition, Psychology
Speech Intelligibility
Speech Perception
Young Adult
Bio-inspired coding strategy
Cochlear implant
Electrically evoked compound action potential
Melodic contour identification
Sentence recognition in noise
Journal
Hearing research
ISSN: 1878-5891
Titre abrégé: Hear Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7900445
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 03 2020
15 03 2020
Historique:
received:
11
07
2019
revised:
24
12
2019
accepted:
31
12
2019
pubmed:
9
2
2020
medline:
3
6
2021
entrez:
9
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A bio-inspired coding (BIC) strategy was implemented in this study with the goal of better representation of spectral and temporal information. The auditory nerve fibers' (ANFs) characteristics such as refractory recovery, facilitation and spatial spread were obtained from ECAP data recorded in 11 CI recipients. These characteristics, together with a non-individualized model-derived adaptation effect, were integrated into the BIC strategy for a better selection of channels. Two variations of the BIC strategy were compared to the conventional advanced combination encoder (ACE) coding strategy: the BIC-I strategy based on the individual CI recipients' ECAP parameters, and the BIC-G strategy based on the median values of ECAP parameters from all CI recipients who participated in the study. The melodic contour identification (MCI) and Oldenburg sentence recognition in noise (OLSA) tests were used to assess and compare the three coding strategies. A significantly better performance in the transformed MCI test results with the rationalized arcsine transformation, was observed for both BIC strategy variations compared to the ACE strategy. There was no significant difference between the two variations of the BIC strategy and the ACE strategy in the OLSA test. No correlation was found between recovery time constants, absolute refractory periods, left and right width of SOE functions from three test electrodes and CI recipients' performances in the two experiments. However, significant correlations were found between facilitation time constant and amplitude and the results of the MCI and OLSA tests for the two variations of the BIC strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32035288
pii: S0378-5955(19)30308-9
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107885
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107885Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declarations of competing interest The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.