Is there a difference in the acromiohumeral distances measured on radiographic and magnetic resonance images of the same shoulder with a massive rotator cuff tear?
Acromiohumeral distance
Hamada grade progression
massive rotator cuff tear
superior capsule reconstruction
superior migration of humeral head
Journal
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
ISSN: 1532-6500
Titre abrégé: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9206499
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
23
08
2019
revised:
17
10
2019
accepted:
20
10
2019
pubmed:
10
2
2020
medline:
4
11
2020
entrez:
10
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of our study was to compare the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) between radiographic and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the same shoulder with massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs). Thirty-four shoulders with MRCTs that had an MRI and radiograph of the same shoulder within an average of 40.3 days (range: 8-109 days) were identified. AHD was measured digitally on radiograph and MRI by 3 examiners. Shoulders were grouped into Hamada grades <3 (group 1) and Hamada grades ≥3 (group 2). The mean age was 66.4 years (range: 51-89). There were 19 men (59%). The Kappa for inter-rater reliability was 0.982 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.975, 0.988) for radiographs and 0.88 (95% CI 0.75, 0.94) for MRI. There was a significant difference in the mean AHD of group 1 on radiograph vs. MRI (7.9 mm vs. 2.5 mm, respectively; P < .0001), but no difference in group 2 (1.8 mm vs. 2.2 mm, respectively; P = .45). There was no difference in AHD in group 1 between shoulders with Goutallier stage <3 (8.1 ± 1.9 mm) and those with Goutallier stage ≥3 (7.3 ± 2.1 mm) (P = .3479). There was no difference in AHD in group 2 between shoulders with Goutallier stage <3 (3.0 ± 0.1 mm) and those with Goutallier stage ≥3 (1.5 ± 1.0 mm) (P = .079). There is a significant difference in AHD measurements between radiograph and MRI of the same shoulder with MRCT in early Hamada grades. AHDs measured on radiograph and MRI should not be used interchangeably in early Hamada grades to assess outcomes of superior capsule reconstruction and similar procedures.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of our study was to compare the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) between radiographic and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the same shoulder with massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs).
METHODS
METHODS
Thirty-four shoulders with MRCTs that had an MRI and radiograph of the same shoulder within an average of 40.3 days (range: 8-109 days) were identified. AHD was measured digitally on radiograph and MRI by 3 examiners. Shoulders were grouped into Hamada grades <3 (group 1) and Hamada grades ≥3 (group 2).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean age was 66.4 years (range: 51-89). There were 19 men (59%). The Kappa for inter-rater reliability was 0.982 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.975, 0.988) for radiographs and 0.88 (95% CI 0.75, 0.94) for MRI. There was a significant difference in the mean AHD of group 1 on radiograph vs. MRI (7.9 mm vs. 2.5 mm, respectively; P < .0001), but no difference in group 2 (1.8 mm vs. 2.2 mm, respectively; P = .45). There was no difference in AHD in group 1 between shoulders with Goutallier stage <3 (8.1 ± 1.9 mm) and those with Goutallier stage ≥3 (7.3 ± 2.1 mm) (P = .3479). There was no difference in AHD in group 2 between shoulders with Goutallier stage <3 (3.0 ± 0.1 mm) and those with Goutallier stage ≥3 (1.5 ± 1.0 mm) (P = .079).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
There is a significant difference in AHD measurements between radiograph and MRI of the same shoulder with MRCT in early Hamada grades. AHDs measured on radiograph and MRI should not be used interchangeably in early Hamada grades to assess outcomes of superior capsule reconstruction and similar procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32035821
pii: S1058-2746(19)30724-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.020
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1145-1151Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.