"It's like heaven over there": medicine as discipline and the production of the carceral body.
Academic medical centers
Correctional managed care
Critical prison studies
Incarcerated patients
Incarceration
Medical residents
Medical students
Prisoners
Journal
Health & justice
ISSN: 2194-7899
Titre abrégé: Health Justice
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101626355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Feb 2020
08 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
24
07
2019
accepted:
30
01
2020
entrez:
10
2
2020
pubmed:
10
2
2020
medline:
10
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Correctional systems in several U.S. states have entered into partnerships with Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) to provide healthcare for people who are incarcerated. This project was initiated to better understand medical trainee perspectives on training and providing healthcare services to prison populations at one AMC specializing in the care of incarcerated patients: The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB). We set out to characterize the attitudes and perceptions of medical trainees from the start of their training until the final year of Internal Medicine residency. Our goal was to analyze medical trainee perspectives on caring for incarcerated patients and to determine what specialized education and training is needed, if any, for the provision of ethical and appropriate healthcare to incarcerated patients. We found that medical trainees grapple with being beneficiaries of a state and institutional power structure that exploits the neglected health of incarcerated patients for the benefit of medical education and research. The benefits include the training opportunities afforded by the advanced pathologies suffered by persons who are incarcerated, an institutional culture that generally allowed students more freedom to practice their skills on incarcerated patients as compared to free-world patients, and an easy compliance of incarcerated patients likely conditioned by their neglect. Most trainees failed to recognize the extreme power differential between provider and patient that facilitates such freedom. Using a critical prison studies/Foucauldian theoretical framework, we identified how the provision/withholding of healthcare to and from persons who are incarcerated plays a major role in disciplining incarcerated bodies into becoming compliant medical patients and research subjects, complacent with and even grateful for delayed care, delivered sometimes below the standard best practices. Specialized vulnerable-population training is sorely needed for both medical trainees and attending physicians in order to not further contribute to this exploitation of incarcerated patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Correctional systems in several U.S. states have entered into partnerships with Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) to provide healthcare for people who are incarcerated. This project was initiated to better understand medical trainee perspectives on training and providing healthcare services to prison populations at one AMC specializing in the care of incarcerated patients: The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB). We set out to characterize the attitudes and perceptions of medical trainees from the start of their training until the final year of Internal Medicine residency. Our goal was to analyze medical trainee perspectives on caring for incarcerated patients and to determine what specialized education and training is needed, if any, for the provision of ethical and appropriate healthcare to incarcerated patients.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We found that medical trainees grapple with being beneficiaries of a state and institutional power structure that exploits the neglected health of incarcerated patients for the benefit of medical education and research. The benefits include the training opportunities afforded by the advanced pathologies suffered by persons who are incarcerated, an institutional culture that generally allowed students more freedom to practice their skills on incarcerated patients as compared to free-world patients, and an easy compliance of incarcerated patients likely conditioned by their neglect. Most trainees failed to recognize the extreme power differential between provider and patient that facilitates such freedom.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Using a critical prison studies/Foucauldian theoretical framework, we identified how the provision/withholding of healthcare to and from persons who are incarcerated plays a major role in disciplining incarcerated bodies into becoming compliant medical patients and research subjects, complacent with and even grateful for delayed care, delivered sometimes below the standard best practices. Specialized vulnerable-population training is sorely needed for both medical trainees and attending physicians in order to not further contribute to this exploitation of incarcerated patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32036547
doi: 10.1186/s40352-020-00107-5
pii: 10.1186/s40352-020-00107-5
pmc: PMC7007681
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5Références
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Mar;26(2):135-58
pubmed: 15027982
Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):2328-33
pubmed: 25322306
Acad Med. 2015 Jan;90(1):16-9
pubmed: 25054416
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jul;65(7):862-72
pubmed: 24686574
Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99(4):666-72
pubmed: 19150898
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Apr 11;154(7):793-5
pubmed: 8147684
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7230-5
pubmed: 24778209
J Adv Nurs. 1982 Mar;7(2):147-56
pubmed: 7045186
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 15;45(8):1047-55
pubmed: 17879924
Ann Intern Med. 1992 May 15;116(10):867-8
pubmed: 1567101
Soc Sci Med. 2006 May;62(10):2479-88
pubmed: 16368178
Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;10(2):74-80
pubmed: 10691060
N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 13;337(20):1436-40
pubmed: 9358142
J Community Health. 1999 Aug;24(4):285-303
pubmed: 10463472
Subst Use Misuse. 2000 Feb;35(3):347-65
pubmed: 10714451
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1041-1042
pubmed: 27427458
Prev Med. 2004 May;38(5):607-12
pubmed: 15066363
Ann Intern Med. 1979 Jun;90(6):957-64
pubmed: 443692
Med Educ. 2005 May;39(5):530-1
pubmed: 15842717
Race Justice. 2012 Jul 1;2(3):
pubmed: 24363956
Addiction. 2017 Oct;112(10):1725-1739
pubmed: 28543749
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;166(1):103-9
pubmed: 19047321
Bull Hist Med. 2009 Summer;83(2):271-301
pubmed: 19502714
Demography. 2008 Feb;45(1):55-77
pubmed: 18390291
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2003 Oct;10(5):578-84
pubmed: 12956637
Public Health Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;125 Suppl 4:25-33
pubmed: 20626190
Fam Pract. 2005 Apr;22(2):177-83
pubmed: 15710642
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Sep-Oct;27(5):753-65
pubmed: 19743514
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Dec;39(6):614-23
pubmed: 26214301
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2010 Jul 09;5:11
pubmed: 20618947
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Apr;64(7):1463-74
pubmed: 17234317
Rev Am Hist. 1996 Dec;24(4):652-6
pubmed: 11618486
West J Med. 1995 Dec;163(6):560-4
pubmed: 8553640
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(4):529-34
pubmed: 16394231
Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Jul;35(7):459-67
pubmed: 21783253
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug;30(4):26-7
pubmed: 10971890
Qual Health Res. 2004 May;14(5):663-74
pubmed: 15107169
Daedalus. 2010;139(3):8-19
pubmed: 21032946
JAMA. 2004 Jul 28;292(4):485-9
pubmed: 15280346