Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Determined by Panoramic Radiographs to the One Determined by Conventional Methods Using Lateral Interocclusal Records in the Saudi Arabian Population.
Condylar guidance
interocclusal records
panoramic radiograph
Journal
Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
ISSN: 2231-0762
Titre abrégé: J Int Soc Prev Community Dent
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101618802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
12
01
2019
accepted:
15
02
2019
entrez:
11
2
2020
pubmed:
11
2
2020
medline:
11
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objectives of this study were to determine the condylar guidance by the conventional method using interocclusal records and by panoramic radiographs in healthy dentate patients and to compare the values obtained from panoramic radiographs with the values obtained by a conventional method. Thirty healthy dentulous subjects of either sex with an age range of 20-40 years visiting Jazan University, College of Dentistry, Dental Clinics for replacement of missing teeth or crowns, were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Maxillary and mandibular casts were obtained and mounted on Whipmix 2240 articulator. Right and left lateral interocclusal records were then made in patients by base plate wax (Dentsply truwax baseplate). This record was transferred to articulator, and condylar values were determined. In all the cases, articulator was programmed. Left and right condylar values were also measured on digital radiographs and readings were recorded. Condylar guidance readings obtained from interocclusal records and those obtained from panoramic radiographic images were compared and analyzed statistically using the The condylar guidance values obtained from the interocclusal record method for both left and right sides were less when compared to the values obtained from tracing the panoramic radiographs (radiographic method). The difference in values of both the methods was highly significant. Although a significant amount of correlation was found between the two methods, better radiographic techniques should be further investigated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32039080
doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_11_19
pii: JISPCD-9-597
pmc: PMC6905319
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
597-604Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2019 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Adv Prosthodont. 2012 Aug;4(3):153-7
pubmed: 22977723
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jan-Mar;18(1):19-23
pubmed: 29430137
J Prosthet Dent. 1965 Sep-Oct;15(5):826-49
pubmed: 5212672
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jul;94(1):10-92
pubmed: 16080238
Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Oct;3(4):383-7
pubmed: 23633793
Int J Prosthodont. 1991 Sep-Oct;4(5):469-72
pubmed: 1811642
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jan;89(1):54-9
pubmed: 12589287
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Jun;99(6):477-82
pubmed: 18514670
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Apr-Jun;16(2):148-53
pubmed: 27141164
Aust Dent J. 1974 Jun;19(3):182-90
pubmed: 4611405
J Am Dent Assoc. 1949 Jun;38(6):697-710
pubmed: 18150040
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Apr-Jun;17(2):175-182
pubmed: 28584419
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Aug;66(2):193-200
pubmed: 1774679