Pharmacological treatments for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.


Journal

Acta neuropsychiatrica
ISSN: 1601-5215
Titre abrégé: Acta Neuropsychiatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9612501

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 11 2 2020
medline: 29 4 2021
entrez: 11 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this paper was to provide a systematic review and update on the pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder (SAD), including the efficacy and tolerability of these agents, the ranking of interventions, and the grading of results by quality of evidence. The Common Mental Disorder Controlled Trial Register and two trial registries were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any pharmacological intervention or placebo in the treatment of SAD. We performed a standard pairwise meta-analysis using a random effects model and carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using the statistical package, R. Quality of evidence was also assessed. We included 67 RCTs in the review and 21 to 45 interventions in the NMA. Paroxetine was most effective in the reduction of symptom severity as compared to placebo. Superior response to treatment was also observed for paroxetine, brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline. Higher dropout rates were found for fluvoxamine. Brofaromine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, pregabalin, sertraline, and venlafaxine performed worse in comparison to placebo for the outcome of dropouts due to adverse events. Olanzapine yielded a relatively high rank for treatment efficacy and buspirone the worse rank for dropouts due to any cause. The differences between drugs and placebo were small, apart from a significant reduction in symptom severity and response for paroxetine. We suggest paroxetine as a first-line treatment of SAD, with the consideration of future research on the drug olanzapine as well as brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline because we observed a response to treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32039743
pii: S092427082000006X
doi: 10.1017/neu.2020.6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Anxiety Agents 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

169-176

Auteurs

Taryn Williams (T)

Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Michael McCaul (M)

Biostatistics Unit, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Universiteit Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Guido Schwarzer (G)

Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Andrea Cipriani (A)

Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Dan J Stein (DJ)

Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
SA MRC Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders.

Jonathan Ipser (J)

Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH