Health-Related Quality of Life in MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer After Endocrine Therapy.
Abemaciclib
Advanced breast cancer
Patient-reported outcomes
Quality of life
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
22
07
2019
accepted:
24
09
2019
entrez:
12
2
2020
pubmed:
12
2
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the phase III MONARCH 2 study (NCT02107703), abemaciclib plus fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study assessed patient-reported pain, global health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functioning, and symptoms. Abemaciclib or placebo (150 p.o. mg twice daily) plus fulvestrant (500 mg, per label) were randomly assigned (2:1). The modified Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (mBPI-sf); European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Core 30 (QLQ-C30); and Breast Cancer Questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) assessed outcomes. Data were collected at baseline, cycle 2, every two cycles 3-13, thereafter at every three cycles, and 30 days postdiscontinuation. Longitudinal mixed regression and Cox proportional hazards models assessed postbaseline change and time to sustained deterioration (TTSD) by study arm. On-treatment HRQoL scores were consistently maintained from baseline and similar between arms. Patients in the abemaciclib arm (n = 446) experienced a 4.9-month delay in pain deterioration (mBPI-sf), compared with the control arm (n = 223), and significantly greater TTSD on the mBPI-sf and analgesic use (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98) and QLQ-C30 pain item (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79). TTSD for functioning and most symptoms significantly favored the abemaciclib arm, including fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and cognitive and social functioning. Only diarrhea significantly favored the control arm (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.20-2.10). HRQoL was maintained on abemaciclib plus fulvestrant. Alongside superior PFS and manageable safety profile, results support treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in a population of patients with endocrine-resistant HR+, HER2-negative ABC. In MONARCH 2, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant demonstrated superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile for patients with in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important to consider, given the palliative nature of ABC treatment. In this study, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, significantly delayed sustained deterioration of pain and other patient-reported symptoms (including fatigue, nausea, vomiting), and social and cognitive functioning. Combined with demonstrated clinical benefit and tolerability, the stabilization of patient-reported symptoms and HRQoL further supports abemaciclib plus fulvestrant as a desirable treatment option in endocrine resistant, HR+, HER2- ABC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In the phase III MONARCH 2 study (NCT02107703), abemaciclib plus fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study assessed patient-reported pain, global health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functioning, and symptoms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Abemaciclib or placebo (150 p.o. mg twice daily) plus fulvestrant (500 mg, per label) were randomly assigned (2:1). The modified Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (mBPI-sf); European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Core 30 (QLQ-C30); and Breast Cancer Questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) assessed outcomes. Data were collected at baseline, cycle 2, every two cycles 3-13, thereafter at every three cycles, and 30 days postdiscontinuation. Longitudinal mixed regression and Cox proportional hazards models assessed postbaseline change and time to sustained deterioration (TTSD) by study arm.
RESULTS
On-treatment HRQoL scores were consistently maintained from baseline and similar between arms. Patients in the abemaciclib arm (n = 446) experienced a 4.9-month delay in pain deterioration (mBPI-sf), compared with the control arm (n = 223), and significantly greater TTSD on the mBPI-sf and analgesic use (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98) and QLQ-C30 pain item (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79). TTSD for functioning and most symptoms significantly favored the abemaciclib arm, including fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and cognitive and social functioning. Only diarrhea significantly favored the control arm (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.20-2.10).
CONCLUSION
HRQoL was maintained on abemaciclib plus fulvestrant. Alongside superior PFS and manageable safety profile, results support treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in a population of patients with endocrine-resistant HR+, HER2-negative ABC.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
In MONARCH 2, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant demonstrated superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile for patients with in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important to consider, given the palliative nature of ABC treatment. In this study, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, significantly delayed sustained deterioration of pain and other patient-reported symptoms (including fatigue, nausea, vomiting), and social and cognitive functioning. Combined with demonstrated clinical benefit and tolerability, the stabilization of patient-reported symptoms and HRQoL further supports abemaciclib plus fulvestrant as a desirable treatment option in endocrine resistant, HR+, HER2- ABC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32043763
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0551
pmc: PMC7011625
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aminopyridines
0
Benzimidazoles
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Fulvestrant
22X328QOC4
abemaciclib
60UAB198HK
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e243-e251Informations de copyright
© 2019 Eli Lilly and Company. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;28(1):16-33
pubmed: 28177437
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44
pubmed: 9440735
Ann Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;29(12):2288-2295
pubmed: 30304498
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 10;35(32):3638-3646
pubmed: 28968163
Qual Life Res. 2012 Sep;21(7):1159-64
pubmed: 21984468
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun;151(3):679-86
pubmed: 25981897
Cell Chem Biol. 2019 Aug 15;26(8):1067-1080.e8
pubmed: 31178407
Invest New Drugs. 2014 Oct;32(5):825-37
pubmed: 24919854
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1047-54
pubmed: 27029704
Ann Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;29(12):2286-2287
pubmed: 30445575
Clin J Pain. 2011 Feb;27(2):116-24
pubmed: 20890182
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):127-134
pubmed: 29164421
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019 Jan 17;5:5
pubmed: 30675515
J Glob Oncol. 2017 Apr 11;3(4):289-303
pubmed: 28831437
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2875-2884
pubmed: 28580882
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Feb;107(6):85-91
pubmed: 20204119
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 May;14(5 Suppl):641-4
pubmed: 27226503
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1990;804:1-75
pubmed: 1702248
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1709-16
pubmed: 23338229
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5218-5224
pubmed: 28533223
Cancer Discov. 2016 Jul;6(7):740-53
pubmed: 27217383
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Oct;14(10):2756-68
pubmed: 8874337
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):535-545
pubmed: 29654415
J Support Oncol. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):72-8
pubmed: 21542414