De Novo Versus Recurrent HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival from the SystHERs Registry.
De novo
HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
Recurrent
Registry
SystHERs
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
12
06
2019
accepted:
20
09
2019
entrez:
12
2
2020
pubmed:
12
2
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Limited data exist describing real-world treatment of de novo and recurrent HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The Systemic Therapies for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Study (SystHERs) was a fully enrolled (2012-2016), observational, prospective registry of patients with HER2-positive MBC. Patients aged ≥18 years and ≤6 months from HER2-positive MBC diagnosis were treated and assessed per their physician's standard practice. The primary endpoint was to characterize treatment patterns by de novo versus recurrent MBC status, compared descriptively. Secondary endpoints included patient characteristics, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, by Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] by Cox regression), and patient-reported outcomes. Among 977 eligible patients, 49.8% (n = 487) had de novo and 50.2% (n = 490) had recurrent disease. A higher proportion of de novo patients had hormone receptor-negative disease (34.9% vs. 24.9%), bone metastasis (57.1% vs. 45.9%), and/or liver metastasis (41.9% vs. 33.1%), and a lower proportion had central nervous system metastasis (4.3% vs. 13.5%). De novo patients received first-line regimens containing chemotherapy (89.7%), trastuzumab (95.7%), and pertuzumab (77.8%) more commonly than recurrent patients (80.0%, 85.9%, and 68.6%, respectively). De novo patients had longer median PFS (17.7 vs. 11.9 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.80; p < .0001) and OS (not estimable vs. 44.5 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69; p < .0001). Patients with de novo versus recurrent HER2-positive MBC exhibit different disease characteristics and survival durations, suggesting these groups have distinct outcomes. These differences may affect future clinical trial design. Clinical trial identification number. NCT01615068 (clinicaltrials.gov). SystHERs was an observational registry of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which is a large, modern, real-world data set for this population and, thereby, provides a unique opportunity to study patients with de novo and recurrent HER2-positive MBC. In SystHERs, patients with de novo disease had different baseline demographics and disease characteristics, had superior clinical outcomes, and more commonly received first-line chemotherapy and/or trastuzumab versus those with recurrent disease. Data from this and other studies suggest that de novo and recurrent MBC have distinct outcomes, which may have implications for disease management strategies and future clinical study design.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Limited data exist describing real-world treatment of de novo and recurrent HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The Systemic Therapies for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Study (SystHERs) was a fully enrolled (2012-2016), observational, prospective registry of patients with HER2-positive MBC. Patients aged ≥18 years and ≤6 months from HER2-positive MBC diagnosis were treated and assessed per their physician's standard practice. The primary endpoint was to characterize treatment patterns by de novo versus recurrent MBC status, compared descriptively. Secondary endpoints included patient characteristics, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, by Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] by Cox regression), and patient-reported outcomes.
RESULTS
Among 977 eligible patients, 49.8% (n = 487) had de novo and 50.2% (n = 490) had recurrent disease. A higher proportion of de novo patients had hormone receptor-negative disease (34.9% vs. 24.9%), bone metastasis (57.1% vs. 45.9%), and/or liver metastasis (41.9% vs. 33.1%), and a lower proportion had central nervous system metastasis (4.3% vs. 13.5%). De novo patients received first-line regimens containing chemotherapy (89.7%), trastuzumab (95.7%), and pertuzumab (77.8%) more commonly than recurrent patients (80.0%, 85.9%, and 68.6%, respectively). De novo patients had longer median PFS (17.7 vs. 11.9 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.80; p < .0001) and OS (not estimable vs. 44.5 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69; p < .0001).
CONCLUSION
Patients with de novo versus recurrent HER2-positive MBC exhibit different disease characteristics and survival durations, suggesting these groups have distinct outcomes. These differences may affect future clinical trial design. Clinical trial identification number. NCT01615068 (clinicaltrials.gov).
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
SystHERs was an observational registry of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which is a large, modern, real-world data set for this population and, thereby, provides a unique opportunity to study patients with de novo and recurrent HER2-positive MBC. In SystHERs, patients with de novo disease had different baseline demographics and disease characteristics, had superior clinical outcomes, and more commonly received first-line chemotherapy and/or trastuzumab versus those with recurrent disease. Data from this and other studies suggest that de novo and recurrent MBC have distinct outcomes, which may have implications for disease management strategies and future clinical study design.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32043771
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0446
pmc: PMC7011632
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01615068']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e214-e222Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2010 Nov;21(11):2169-74
pubmed: 20427349
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan;167(2):579-590
pubmed: 29039120
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jun;145(3):725-34
pubmed: 24706168
Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):461-71
pubmed: 23602601
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 15;22(16):3302-8
pubmed: 15310773
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):92-8
pubmed: 19933921
Br J Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;112(9):1445-51
pubmed: 25880008
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19
pubmed: 22149875
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):724-34
pubmed: 25693012
Oncologist. 2015 Aug;20(8):880-9
pubmed: 26099741
BMC Cancer. 2014 May 02;14:307
pubmed: 24885258
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jun;26(6):809-815
pubmed: 28522448
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jun 1;110(6):568-580
pubmed: 29315431
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 28;106(5):
pubmed: 24777111
Oncologist. 2014 Dec;19(12):1209-15
pubmed: 25355843