Withholding the Introduction of Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Impact on Outcomes in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Tumors: A Multicenter AGEO Study (the WAIT or ACT Study).


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
received: 29 04 2019
accepted: 21 08 2019
entrez: 12 2 2020
pubmed: 12 2 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with RAS wild-type (WT) nonresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may receive either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) combined with first-line, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Without the RAS status information, the oncologist can either start chemotherapy with bevacizumab or wait for the introduction of the anti-EGFR. Our objective was to compare both strategies in a routine practice setting. This multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-weighted study included patients with a RAS WT nonresectable mCRC, treated between 2013 and 2016 by a 5-FU-based chemotherapy, with either delayed anti-EGFR or immediate anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Primary criterion was overall survival (OS). Secondary criteria were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). A total of 262 patients (129 in the anti-VEGF group and 133 in the anti-EGFR group) were included. Patients receiving an anti-VEGF were more often men (68% vs. 56%), with more metastatic sites (>2 sites: 15% vs. 9%). The median delay to obtain the RAS status was 19 days (interquartile range: 13-26). Median OS was not significantly different in the two groups (29 vs. 30.5 months, p = .299), even after weighting on the propensity score (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.08, p = .2024). The delayed introduction of anti-EGFR was associated with better median PFS (13.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = .0244), even after weighting on the propensity score (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.61-0.90, p = .0024). ORR was significantly higher in the anti-EGFR group (66.7% vs. 45.6%, p = .0007). Delayed introduction of anti-EGFR had no deleterious effect on OS, PFS, and ORR, compared with doublet chemotherapy with anti-VEGF. For RAS/RAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, patients may receive 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In daily practice, the time to obtain the RAS status might be long enough to consider two options: to start the chemotherapy with bevacizumab, or to start without a targeted therapy and to add the anti-EGFR at reception of the RAS status. This study found no deleterious effect of the delayed introduction of an anti-EGFR on survival, compared with the introduction of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor from cycle 1. It is possible to wait one or two cycles to introduce the anti-EGFR while waiting for RAS status.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Patients with RAS wild-type (WT) nonresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may receive either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) combined with first-line, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Without the RAS status information, the oncologist can either start chemotherapy with bevacizumab or wait for the introduction of the anti-EGFR. Our objective was to compare both strategies in a routine practice setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-weighted study included patients with a RAS WT nonresectable mCRC, treated between 2013 and 2016 by a 5-FU-based chemotherapy, with either delayed anti-EGFR or immediate anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Primary criterion was overall survival (OS). Secondary criteria were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).
RESULTS
A total of 262 patients (129 in the anti-VEGF group and 133 in the anti-EGFR group) were included. Patients receiving an anti-VEGF were more often men (68% vs. 56%), with more metastatic sites (>2 sites: 15% vs. 9%). The median delay to obtain the RAS status was 19 days (interquartile range: 13-26). Median OS was not significantly different in the two groups (29 vs. 30.5 months, p = .299), even after weighting on the propensity score (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.08, p = .2024). The delayed introduction of anti-EGFR was associated with better median PFS (13.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = .0244), even after weighting on the propensity score (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.61-0.90, p = .0024). ORR was significantly higher in the anti-EGFR group (66.7% vs. 45.6%, p = .0007).
CONCLUSION
Delayed introduction of anti-EGFR had no deleterious effect on OS, PFS, and ORR, compared with doublet chemotherapy with anti-VEGF.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
For RAS/RAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, patients may receive 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In daily practice, the time to obtain the RAS status might be long enough to consider two options: to start the chemotherapy with bevacizumab, or to start without a targeted therapy and to add the anti-EGFR at reception of the RAS status. This study found no deleterious effect of the delayed introduction of an anti-EGFR on survival, compared with the introduction of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor from cycle 1. It is possible to wait one or two cycles to introduce the anti-EGFR while waiting for RAS status.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32043796
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0328
pmc: PMC7011620
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal 0
Bevacizumab 2S9ZZM9Q9V
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e266-e275

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

Références

Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 12;4(7):e173695
pubmed: 29167892
Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 15;66(8):3992-5
pubmed: 16618717
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34
pubmed: 30620402
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1325-1332
pubmed: 28419195
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jun;49(9):2126-33
pubmed: 23473612
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jan;70:87-98
pubmed: 27907852
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 May;50(5):507-512
pubmed: 29396127
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2392-2401
pubmed: 28632865
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1426-1434
pubmed: 27575024
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1065-75
pubmed: 25088940
Ann Oncol. 2018 May 1;29(5):1211-1219
pubmed: 29438522
Target Oncol. 2018 Dec;13(6):735-743
pubmed: 30353488
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):112-118
pubmed: 28950295
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1386-422
pubmed: 27380959
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 20;32(21):2240-7
pubmed: 24687833
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 20;26(3):374-9
pubmed: 18202412
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):179-85
pubmed: 26438111
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1713-1729
pubmed: 28407110
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Dec 31;109(5):
pubmed: 28040692
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 12;369(11):1023-34
pubmed: 24024839

Auteurs

Lola-Jade Palmieri (LJ)

Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.

Laurent Mineur (L)

Department of Oncology, Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France.

David Tougeron (D)

Department of Oncology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.

Benoît Rousseau (B)

Department of Oncology, Mondor Hospital, Paris, France.

Victoire Granger (V)

Department of Gastroenterology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Jean-Marc Gornet (JM)

Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France.

Denis Smith (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

Astrid Lievre (A)

Department of Gastroenterology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.

Marie-Pierre Galais (MP)

Department of Medical Oncology, François Baclesse Center, Caen, France.

Solene Doat (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France.

Simon Pernot (S)

Department of Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.

Anne-Laure Bignon-Bretagne (AL)

Department of Gastroenterology, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.

Jean-Philippe Metges (JP)

Department of Medical Oncology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.

Nabil Baba-Hamed (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.

Pierre Michel (P)

Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm 1245, IRON Group, Rouen, France.

Stéphane Obled (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France.

Carole Vitellius (C)

Department of Gastroenterology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.

Olivier Bouche (O)

Department of Digestive Oncology, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.

Léa Saban-Roche (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre de cancérologie de la Loire, Saint Etienne, France.

Bruno Buecher (B)

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Gaëtan des Guetz (G)

Department of Medical Oncology, Delafontaine Hospital, Saint Denis, France.

Christophe Locher (C)

Department of Gastroenterology, Meaux General Hospital, Meaux, France.

Isabelle Trouilloud (I)

Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.

Gaël Goujon (G)

Department of Gastroenterology, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.

Marie Dior (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Louis Mourier Hospital, Colombes, France.

Sylvain Manfredi (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.

Emilie Soularue (E)

Department of Gastroenterology, Kremlin Bicêtre Hospital, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

Jean-Marc Phelip (JM)

Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Etienne University Hospital, Saint Etienne, France.

Julie Henriques (J)

Methodology and Quality of Life Oncology Unit, INSERM UMR 1098, Besancon University Hospital, Besançon, France.

Dewi Vernery (D)

Methodology and Quality of Life Oncology Unit, INSERM UMR 1098, Besancon University Hospital, Besançon, France.

Romain Coriat (R)

Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH