Patterns of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) Biosimilar Use Across United States Rheumatology Practices.


Journal

ACR open rheumatology
ISSN: 2578-5745
Titre abrégé: ACR Open Rheumatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101740025

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 18 11 2019
accepted: 21 11 2019
entrez: 12 2 2020
pubmed: 12 2 2020
medline: 12 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

It is unclear if biosimilars of biologics for inflammatory arthritis are realizing their promise to increase competition and improve accessibility. This study evaluates biosimilar tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) utilization across rheumatology practices in the United States and compares whether patients initiating biosimilars remain on these treatments at least as long as new initiators of bio-originators. We identified a cohort of patients initiating a TNFi biosimilar between January 2017 and September 2018 from an electronic health record registry containing data from 218 rheumatology practices and over 1 million rheumatology patients in the United States. We also identified a cohort of patients who initiated the bio-originator TNFi during the same period. We calculated the proportion of biosimilar prescriptions compared with other TNFi's and compared persistence on these therapies, adjusting for age, sex, diagnoses codes, and insurance type. We identified 909 patients prescribed the biosimilar infliximab-dyyb, the only biosimilar prescribed, and 4413 patients with a new prescription for the bio-originator infliximab. Biosimilar patients tended to be older, have a diagnosis code for rheumatoid arthritis, and covered by Medicare insurance. Over the study period, biosimilar prescriptions reached a maximum of 3.5% of all TNFi prescriptions. Patients persisted on the biosimilar at least as long as the bio-originator infliximab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, P = 0.07). The uptake of biosimilars in the United States remains low despite persistence on infliximab-dyyb being similar to the infliximab bio-originator. These results add to clinical studies that should provide greater confidence to patients and physicians regarding biosimilar use.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32043831
doi: 10.1002/acr2.11106
pmc: PMC7011419
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

79-83

Subventions

Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P30 AR072577
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P30AR72577
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

Références

Rheumatol Ther. 2017 Dec;4(2):209-218
pubmed: 29032452
JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):931-933
pubmed: 30193264
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Dec;68(12):1866-1873
pubmed: 27696755
Lancet. 2017 Jun 10;389(10086):2304-2316
pubmed: 28502609
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 May;68(5):1076-9
pubmed: 26662931
BioDrugs. 2018 Jun;32(3):193-199
pubmed: 29790131
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jun;75(6):974-82
pubmed: 26964144
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018 May;18(5):499-504
pubmed: 29633865

Auteurs

Nick Bansback (N)

University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Jeffrey R Curtis (JR)

University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Jie Huang (J)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Zeling He (Z)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Michael Evans (M)

University of California San Francisco.

Tracy Johansson (T)

Practice, Advocacy & Quality, American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia.

Kaleb Michaud (K)

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, and Forward, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas.

Gabriela Schmajuk (G)

Rheumatology Division, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California.

Katherine P Liao (KP)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA and Boston VA Medical Center and Harvard Medical School.

Classifications MeSH