Predictors of hemodynamic decompensation in progressive hypovolemia: Compensatory reserve versus heart rate variability.


Journal

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 12 2 2020
medline: 5 1 2021
entrez: 12 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Hemorrhage remains the leading cause of death following traumatic injury in both civilian and military settings. Heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate complexity (HRC) have been proposed as potential "new vital signs" for monitoring trauma patients; however, the added benefit of HRV or HRC for decision support remains unclear. Another new paradigm, the compensatory reserve measurement (CRM), represents the integration of all cardiopulmonary mechanisms responsible for compensation during relative blood loss and was developed to identify current physiologic status by estimating the progression toward hemodynamic decompensation. In the present study, we hypothesized that CRM would provide greater sensitivity and specificity to detect progressive reductions in central circulating blood volume and onset of decompensation as compared with measurements of HRV and HRC. Continuous, noninvasive measurements of compensatory reserve and electrocardiogram signals were made on 101 healthy volunteers during lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) to the point of decompensation. Measures of HRV and HRC were taken from electrocardiogram signal data. Compensatory reserve measurement demonstrated a superior sensitivity and specificity (receiver operator characteristic area under the curve [ROC AUC] = 0.93) compared with all HRV measures (ROC AUC ≤ 0.84) and all HRC measures (ROC AUC ≤ 0.86). Sensitivity and specificity values at the ROC optimal thresholds were greater for CRM (sensitivity = 0.84; specificity = 0.84) than HRV (sensitivity, ≤0.78; specificity, ≤0.77), and HRC (sensitivity, ≤0.79; specificity, ≤0.77). With standardized values across all levels of LBNP, CRM had a steeper decline, less variability, and explained a greater proportion of the variation in the data than both HRV and HRC during progressive hypovolemia. These findings add to the growing body of literature describing the advantages of CRM for detecting reductions in central blood volume. Most importantly, these results provide further support for the potential use of CRM in the triage and monitoring of patients at highest risk for the onset of shock following blood loss.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hemorrhage remains the leading cause of death following traumatic injury in both civilian and military settings. Heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate complexity (HRC) have been proposed as potential "new vital signs" for monitoring trauma patients; however, the added benefit of HRV or HRC for decision support remains unclear. Another new paradigm, the compensatory reserve measurement (CRM), represents the integration of all cardiopulmonary mechanisms responsible for compensation during relative blood loss and was developed to identify current physiologic status by estimating the progression toward hemodynamic decompensation. In the present study, we hypothesized that CRM would provide greater sensitivity and specificity to detect progressive reductions in central circulating blood volume and onset of decompensation as compared with measurements of HRV and HRC.
METHODS
Continuous, noninvasive measurements of compensatory reserve and electrocardiogram signals were made on 101 healthy volunteers during lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) to the point of decompensation. Measures of HRV and HRC were taken from electrocardiogram signal data.
RESULTS
Compensatory reserve measurement demonstrated a superior sensitivity and specificity (receiver operator characteristic area under the curve [ROC AUC] = 0.93) compared with all HRV measures (ROC AUC ≤ 0.84) and all HRC measures (ROC AUC ≤ 0.86). Sensitivity and specificity values at the ROC optimal thresholds were greater for CRM (sensitivity = 0.84; specificity = 0.84) than HRV (sensitivity, ≤0.78; specificity, ≤0.77), and HRC (sensitivity, ≤0.79; specificity, ≤0.77). With standardized values across all levels of LBNP, CRM had a steeper decline, less variability, and explained a greater proportion of the variation in the data than both HRV and HRC during progressive hypovolemia.
CONCLUSION
These findings add to the growing body of literature describing the advantages of CRM for detecting reductions in central blood volume. Most importantly, these results provide further support for the potential use of CRM in the triage and monitoring of patients at highest risk for the onset of shock following blood loss.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32044875
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002605
pii: 01586154-202008002-00024
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S161-S168

Références

Carrico CJ, Holcomb JB, Chaudry IH, PULSE Trauma Work Group (Post Resuscitative and Initial Utility of Life Saving Efforts). Scientific priorities and strategic planning for resuscitation research and life saving therapy following traumatic injury: report of the PULSE trauma work group. Post resuscitative and initial utility of life saving efforts. Shock. 2002;17(3):165–168.
Bellamy RF. The causes of death in conventional land warfare: implications for combat casualty care research. Mil Med. 1984;149:55–62.
Boulanger L, Joshi AV, Tortella BJ, Menzin J, Caloyeras JP, Russell MW. Excess mortality, length of stay, and costs associated with serious hemorrhage among trauma patients: findings from the National Trauma Data Bank. Am Surg. 2007;73:1269–1274.
Holcomb JB, Stansbury LG, Champion HR, Wade C, Bellamy RF. Understanding combat casualty care statistics. J Trauma. 2006;60:397–401.
Convertino VA, Moulton SL, Grudic GZ, Rickards CA, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Gerhardt RT, Blackbourne LH, Ryan KL. Use of advanced machine-learning techniques for noninvasive monitoring of hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2011;71:S25–S32.
Cottingham CA. Resuscitation of traumatic shock: a hemodynamic review. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2006;17(3):317–326.
Convertino VA, Ryan KL, Rickards CA, Salinas J, McManus JG, Cooke WH, Holcomb JB. Physiological and medical monitoring for en route care of combat casualties. J Trauma. 2008;64(Suppl 4):S342–53.
Snyder HS, Dresnick SJ. Lack of tachycardic response to hypotension in penetrating abdominal injuries. J Emerg Med. 1989;7(4):335–339.
Victorino GP, Battistella FD, Wisner DH. Does tachycardia correlate with hypotension after trauma? J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196(5):679–684.
Brasel KJ, Guse C, Gentilello LM, Nirula R. Heart rate: is it truly a vital sign? J Trauma. 2007;62(4):812–817.
Cooke WH, Salinas J, Convertino VA, Ludwig DA, Hinds D, Duke JH, Moore FA, Holcomb JB. Heart rate variability and its association with mortality in pre-hospital trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006;60:363–370.
Cooke WH, Salinas J, McManus JG, Ryan KL, Rickards CA, Holcomb JB, Convertino VA. Heart period variability in trauma patients may predict mortality and allow remote triage. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006;77:1107–1112.
Batchinsky AI, Cancio LC, Salinas J, Kuusela T, Cooke WH, Wang JJ, Boehme M, Convertino VA, Holcomb JB. Prehospital loss of R-to-R interval complexity is associated with mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007;63:512–518.
Cancio LC, Batchinsky AI, Salinas J, Kuusela TA, Convertino VA, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. Heart-rate complexity for prediction of prehospital lifesaving interventions in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2008;65(4):813–819.
King DR, Ogilvie MP, Pereira BM, Chang Y, Manning RJ, Conner JA, Schulman CI, McKenney MG, Proctor KG. Heart rate variability as a triage tool in patients with trauma during prehospital helicopter transport. J Trauma. 2009;67(3):436–440.
Ong ME, Padmanabhan P, Chan YH, Lin Z, Overton J, Ward KR, Fei DY. An observational, prospective study exploring the use of heart rate variability as a predictor of clinical outcomes in pre-hospital ambulance patients. Resuscitation. 2008;78(3):289–297.
Hinojosa-Laborde C, Rickards CA, Ryan KL, Convertino VA. Heart rate variability during simulated hemorrhage with lower body negative pressure in high and low tolerant subjects. Front Physiol. 2011;2:85.
Rickards CA, Ryan KL, Ludwig DA, Convertino VA. Is heart period variability associated with the administration of lifesaving interventions in individual prehospital trauma patients with normal standard vital signs? Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1666–1673.
Carter R 3rd, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Convertino VA. Variability in integration of mechanisms associated with high tolerance to progressive reductions in central blood volume: the compensatory reserve. Physiol Rep. 2016;4(4). pii: e12705.
pii: e12705
Convertino VA, Howard JT, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Cardin S, Batchelder P, Mulligan J, Grudic GZ, Moulton SL, MacLeod DB. Individual-specific, beat-to-beat trending of significant human blood loss: the compensatory reserve. Shock. 2015;(44 Suppl 1):27–32.
Convertino VA. Blood pressure measurement for accurate assessment of patient status in emergency medical settings. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012;83:614–619.
Convertino VA, Grudic GZ, Mulligan J, Moulton SL. Estimation of individual-specific progression to impending cardiovascular instability using arterial waveforms. J Appl Physiol. 2013;115(8):1196–1202.
Moulton S, Mulligan J, Grudic GZ, Convertino VA. Running on empty? The compensatory reserve index. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:1053–1059.
Nadler R, Convertino VA, Gendler S, Lending G, Lipsky AM, Cardin S, Lowenthal A, Glassberg E. The value of noninvasive measurement of the compensatory reserve index in monitoring and triage of patients experiencing minimal blood loss. Shock. 2014;42(2):93–98.
Stewart CL, Mulligan J, Grudic GZ, Convertino VA, Moulton SL. Detection of low-volume blood loss: compensatory reserve versus traditional vital signs. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(6):892–897; discussion 897-8.
Convertino VA, Wirt MD, Glenn JF, Lein BC. The compensatory reserve for early and accurate prediction of hemodynamic compromise: a review of the underlying physiology. Shock. 2016;45(6):580–590.
Hinojosa-Laborde C, Shade RE, Muniz GW, Bauer C, Goei KA, Pidcoke HF, Chung KK, Cap AP, Convertino VA. Validation of lower body negative pressure as an experimental model of hemorrhage. J Appl Physiol. 2014;116:406–415.
Convertino VA, Schiller AM. Measuring the compensatory reserve to identify shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(6S Suppl 1):S57–S56.
Convertino VA, Sawka MN. Wearable technology for compensatory reserve to sense hypovolemia. J Appl Physiol. 2018;124:442–451.
Howard JT, Janak JC, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Convertino VA. Specificity of compensatory reserve and tissue oxygenation as early predictors of tolerance to progressive reductions in central blood volume. Shock. 2016;46(3 Suppl 1):68–73.
Janak JC, Howard JT, Goei KA, Weber R, Muniz GW, Hinojosa-Laborde C, Convertino VA. Predictors of the onset of hemodynamic decompensation during progressive central hypovolemia: comparison of the peripheral perfusion index, pulse pressure variability, and compensatory reserve index. Shock. 2015;44(6):548–553.
Schiller AM, Howard JT, Lye KR, Magby CG, Convertino VA. Comparisons of traditional metabolic markers and compensatory reserve as early predictors of tolerance to central hypovolemia in humans. Shock. 2018;50(1):71–77.
Ryan KL, Rickards CA, Ludwig D, Convertino VA. Tracking central hypovolemia with ECG in humans: cautions for the use of heart period variability in patient monitoring. Shock. 2010;33(6):583–589.
Sather TM, Goldwater DJ, Montgomery LD, Convertino VA. Cardiovascular dynamics associated with tolerance to lower body negative pressure. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986;57(5):413–419.
Convertino VA, Sather TM. Vasoactive neuroendocrine responses associated with tolerance to lower body negative pressure in humans. Clin Physiol. 2000;20:177–184.
Rickards CA, Ryan KL, Cooke WH, Convertino VA. Tolerance to central hypovolemia: the influence of oscillations in arterial pressure and cerebral blood velocity. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:1048–1058.
Convertino VA, Rickards CA, Ryan KL. Autonomic mechanisms associated with heart rate and vasoconstrictor reserves. Clin Auton Res. 2012;22:123–130.
Cooke WH, Rickards CA, Ryan KL, Convertino VA. Autonomic compensation to simulated hemorrhage monitored with heart period variability. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(6):1892–1899.
Ryan ML, Ogilvie MP, Pereira BM, Gomez-Rodriguez JC, Manning RJ, Vargas PA, Duncan RC, Proctor KG. Heart rate variability is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in Hemodynamically stable trauma patients. J Trauma. 2011;70(6):1371–1380.
Ryan ML, Thorson CM, Otero CA, Vu T, Proctor KG. Clinical Applications of Heart Rate Variability in the Triage and Assessment of Traumatically Injured Patients. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:416590.
Rickards CA, Ryan KL, Convertino VA. Characterization of common measures of heart period variability in healthy human subjects: implications for patient monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010;24(1):61–70.
Benov A, Yaslowitz O, Hakim T, Amir-Keret R, Nadler R, Brand A, Glassberg E, Yitzhak A, Convertino VA, Paran H. The effect of blood transfusion on compensatory reserve: a prospective clinical trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1 Suppl 1):S71–S76.
Johnson MC, Alarhayem A, Convertino VA, et al. Compensatory reserve index: performance of a novel monitoring technology to identify bleeding trauma patients. Shock. 2018;49:295–300.
Stewart CL, Nawn CD, Mulligan J, Grudic G, Moulton SL, Convertino VA. Compensatory reserve for early and accurate prediction of hemodynamic compromise: case studies for clinical utility in acute care and physical performance. J Spec Oper Med. 2016;16(1):6–13.
Stewart CL, Mulligan J, Grudic GZ, Talley ME, Jurkovich GJ, Moulton SL. The compensatory reserve index following injury: results of a prospective clinical trial. Shock. 2016;46(3 Suppl 1):61–67.
Benov A, Brand A, Rosenblat T, et al. Evaluation of sepsis using compensatory reserve measurement: a prospective clinical trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019; (In Press).
Convertino VA, Wampler MR, Johnson MC, et al. Identifying clinically valid threshold values for a dashboard view of the compensatory reserve measurement for hemorrhage detection. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019; (In Press).
Johnson MC, Alarhayem A, Convertino VA, et al. Comparison of compensatory reserve and arterial lactate as markers of shock and resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83:603–608.

Auteurs

Taylor E Schlotman (TE)

From the US Army Institute of Surgical Research (T.E.S., M.R.S., N.J.K., V.A.C.), Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston; University of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Kinesiology, Health, and Nutrition (J.T.H.), San Antonio, Texas; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology (A.M.S.), Omaha, Nebraska; and Naval Medical Research Unit-San Antonio (S.C.), Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH