Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.
Adult
Aged
Analgesics
/ therapeutic use
Clinical Decision-Making
Feasibility Studies
Female
General Practice
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Musculoskeletal Pain
/ therapy
Nonprescription Drugs
/ therapeutic use
Pain Clinics
Patient Education as Topic
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient Selection
Physical Therapy Modalities
Pilot Projects
Primary Health Care
Prognosis
Referral and Consultation
Rheumatology
Selection Bias
Self-Management
Severity of Illness Index
United Kingdom
General practice
Musculoskeletal pain
Primary care
Prognosis
Stratified care
Journal
BMC family practice
ISSN: 1471-2296
Titre abrégé: BMC Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 02 2020
11 02 2020
Historique:
received:
24
10
2019
accepted:
23
12
2019
entrez:
13
2
2020
pubmed:
13
2
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain from the five most common presentations to primary care (back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain), where the majority of patients are managed, is a costly global health challenge. At present, first-line decision-making is based on clinical reasoning and stratified models of care have only been tested in patients with low back pain. We therefore, examined the feasibility of; a) a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), and b) General Practitioners (GPs) providing stratified care at the point-of-consultation for these five most common MSK pain presentations. The design was a pragmatic pilot, two parallel-arm (stratified versus non-stratified care), cluster RCT and the setting was 8 UK GP practices (4 intervention, 4 control) with randomisation (stratified by practice size) and blinding of trial statistician and outcome data-collectors. Participants were adult consulters with MSK pain without indicators of serious pathologies, urgent medical needs, or vulnerabilities. Potential participant records were tagged and individuals sent postal invitations using a GP point-of-consultation electronic medical record (EMR) template. The intervention was supported by the EMR template housing the Keele STarT MSK Tool (to stratify into low, medium and high-risk prognostic subgroups of persistent pain and disability) and recommended matched treatment options. Feasibility outcomes included exploration of recruitment and follow-up rates, selection bias, and GP intervention fidelity. To capture recommended outcomes including pain and function, participants completed an initial questionnaire, brief monthly questionnaire (postal or SMS), and 6-month follow-up questionnaire. An anonymised EMR audit described GP decision-making. GPs screened 3063 patients (intervention = 1591, control = 1472), completed the EMR template with 1237 eligible patients (intervention = 513, control = 724) and 524 participants (42%) consented to data collection (intervention = 231, control = 293). Recruitment took 28 weeks (target 12 weeks) with > 90% follow-up retention (target > 75%). We detected no selection bias of concern and no harms identified. GP stratification tool fidelity failed to achieve a-priori success criteria, whilst fidelity to the matched treatments achieved "complete success". A future definitive cluster RCT of stratified care for MSK pain is feasible and is underway, following key amendments including a clinician-completed version of the stratification tool and refinements to recommended matched treatments. Name of the registry: ISRCTN. 15366334. Date of registration: 06/04/2016.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain from the five most common presentations to primary care (back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain), where the majority of patients are managed, is a costly global health challenge. At present, first-line decision-making is based on clinical reasoning and stratified models of care have only been tested in patients with low back pain. We therefore, examined the feasibility of; a) a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), and b) General Practitioners (GPs) providing stratified care at the point-of-consultation for these five most common MSK pain presentations.
METHODS
The design was a pragmatic pilot, two parallel-arm (stratified versus non-stratified care), cluster RCT and the setting was 8 UK GP practices (4 intervention, 4 control) with randomisation (stratified by practice size) and blinding of trial statistician and outcome data-collectors. Participants were adult consulters with MSK pain without indicators of serious pathologies, urgent medical needs, or vulnerabilities. Potential participant records were tagged and individuals sent postal invitations using a GP point-of-consultation electronic medical record (EMR) template. The intervention was supported by the EMR template housing the Keele STarT MSK Tool (to stratify into low, medium and high-risk prognostic subgroups of persistent pain and disability) and recommended matched treatment options. Feasibility outcomes included exploration of recruitment and follow-up rates, selection bias, and GP intervention fidelity. To capture recommended outcomes including pain and function, participants completed an initial questionnaire, brief monthly questionnaire (postal or SMS), and 6-month follow-up questionnaire. An anonymised EMR audit described GP decision-making.
RESULTS
GPs screened 3063 patients (intervention = 1591, control = 1472), completed the EMR template with 1237 eligible patients (intervention = 513, control = 724) and 524 participants (42%) consented to data collection (intervention = 231, control = 293). Recruitment took 28 weeks (target 12 weeks) with > 90% follow-up retention (target > 75%). We detected no selection bias of concern and no harms identified. GP stratification tool fidelity failed to achieve a-priori success criteria, whilst fidelity to the matched treatments achieved "complete success".
CONCLUSIONS
A future definitive cluster RCT of stratified care for MSK pain is feasible and is underway, following key amendments including a clinician-completed version of the stratification tool and refinements to recommended matched treatments.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Name of the registry: ISRCTN.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
15366334. Date of registration: 06/04/2016.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32046647
doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1074-9
pii: 10.1186/s12875-019-1074-9
pmc: PMC7014664
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics
0
Nonprescription Drugs
0
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN15366334']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
30Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR-RP-011-015
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-1211-20010
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Programme Grants for Applied Research
ID : RP-PG-1211-20010
Pays : International
Références
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):537-44
pubmed: 26553893
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 17;7(1):e012901
pubmed: 28096253
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Nov;61(592):657-8
pubmed: 22054314
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94
pubmed: 15485730
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Nov;58(556):790-7, i-vi
pubmed: 19000402
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2791-2803
pubmed: 29971708
Spine J. 2011 Jul;11(7):622-32
pubmed: 21601533
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2368-2383
pubmed: 29573872
Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):110-6
pubmed: 22507360
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jun 1;20(1):271
pubmed: 31153364
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;54(2):79-86
pubmed: 30826805
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Aug;64(8):1217-24
pubmed: 22422737
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800
pubmed: 26063472
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 12;17:277
pubmed: 27405870
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Feb 8;170(3):271-7
pubmed: 20142573
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Oct 27;3:22
pubmed: 14580266
Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):37-43
pubmed: 22579043
Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2323-2330
pubmed: 27059888
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Nov;71(11):1796-802
pubmed: 22492783
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70
pubmed: 20046623
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1603-1658
pubmed: 27733283
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 05;6(8):e012331
pubmed: 27496243
Lancet. 2005 Jun 11-17;365(9476):2024-30
pubmed: 15950716
J Physiother. 2011;57(3):197
pubmed: 21843839
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8):1460-2
pubmed: 22481127
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1039-56
pubmed: 26071431
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;35(5):1292-300
pubmed: 16943232
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;54(11):642-651
pubmed: 30760458
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):632-41
pubmed: 18438893
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Oct 1;27(19):2116-23; discussion 2124
pubmed: 12394923
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3130-9
pubmed: 11124729
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0178621
pubmed: 28640822
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Mar 24;7:21
pubmed: 16563164
Clin J Pain. 2013 May;29(5):411-6
pubmed: 23549065
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):141-4
pubmed: 6222486
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17
pubmed: 19521015
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 14;6(10):e012445
pubmed: 27742627
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(41):1-253, iii-iv
pubmed: 20807469
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jan;66(1):147-56
pubmed: 24376249
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Aug;57(541):655-61
pubmed: 17688762
Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71
pubmed: 21963002
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Jul - Aug;22(4):255-264
pubmed: 29970301
BMJ. 2004 Dec 11;329(7479):1377
pubmed: 15556955
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;28(1):119-42
pubmed: 24792948
BMJ. 2008 Dec 11;337:a2656
pubmed: 19074232
Pain Med. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):1500-1508
pubmed: 30615172
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):31
pubmed: 32046656
Eur J Pain. 2021 Nov;25(10):2081-2093
pubmed: 34101299
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 May;16(5):542-50
pubmed: 18294869
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Oct;68(10):1443-52
pubmed: 26991934
BMJ. 2009 Oct 09;339:b4006
pubmed: 19819928
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2384-2388
pubmed: 29573871
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 02;11:144
pubmed: 20598124
BMJ. 2016 Feb 17;352:i942
pubmed: 26887896
Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 Feb 29;14(1):205
pubmed: 22404958