Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.


Journal

BMC family practice
ISSN: 1471-2296
Titre abrégé: BMC Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967792

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 02 2020
Historique:
received: 24 10 2019
accepted: 23 12 2019
entrez: 13 2 2020
pubmed: 13 2 2020
medline: 1 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain from the five most common presentations to primary care (back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain), where the majority of patients are managed, is a costly global health challenge. At present, first-line decision-making is based on clinical reasoning and stratified models of care have only been tested in patients with low back pain. We therefore, examined the feasibility of; a) a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), and b) General Practitioners (GPs) providing stratified care at the point-of-consultation for these five most common MSK pain presentations. The design was a pragmatic pilot, two parallel-arm (stratified versus non-stratified care), cluster RCT and the setting was 8 UK GP practices (4 intervention, 4 control) with randomisation (stratified by practice size) and blinding of trial statistician and outcome data-collectors. Participants were adult consulters with MSK pain without indicators of serious pathologies, urgent medical needs, or vulnerabilities. Potential participant records were tagged and individuals sent postal invitations using a GP point-of-consultation electronic medical record (EMR) template. The intervention was supported by the EMR template housing the Keele STarT MSK Tool (to stratify into low, medium and high-risk prognostic subgroups of persistent pain and disability) and recommended matched treatment options. Feasibility outcomes included exploration of recruitment and follow-up rates, selection bias, and GP intervention fidelity. To capture recommended outcomes including pain and function, participants completed an initial questionnaire, brief monthly questionnaire (postal or SMS), and 6-month follow-up questionnaire. An anonymised EMR audit described GP decision-making. GPs screened 3063 patients (intervention = 1591, control = 1472), completed the EMR template with 1237 eligible patients (intervention = 513, control = 724) and 524 participants (42%) consented to data collection (intervention = 231, control = 293). Recruitment took 28 weeks (target 12 weeks) with > 90% follow-up retention (target > 75%). We detected no selection bias of concern and no harms identified. GP stratification tool fidelity failed to achieve a-priori success criteria, whilst fidelity to the matched treatments achieved "complete success". A future definitive cluster RCT of stratified care for MSK pain is feasible and is underway, following key amendments including a clinician-completed version of the stratification tool and refinements to recommended matched treatments. Name of the registry: ISRCTN. 15366334. Date of registration: 06/04/2016.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain from the five most common presentations to primary care (back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain), where the majority of patients are managed, is a costly global health challenge. At present, first-line decision-making is based on clinical reasoning and stratified models of care have only been tested in patients with low back pain. We therefore, examined the feasibility of; a) a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), and b) General Practitioners (GPs) providing stratified care at the point-of-consultation for these five most common MSK pain presentations.
METHODS
The design was a pragmatic pilot, two parallel-arm (stratified versus non-stratified care), cluster RCT and the setting was 8 UK GP practices (4 intervention, 4 control) with randomisation (stratified by practice size) and blinding of trial statistician and outcome data-collectors. Participants were adult consulters with MSK pain without indicators of serious pathologies, urgent medical needs, or vulnerabilities. Potential participant records were tagged and individuals sent postal invitations using a GP point-of-consultation electronic medical record (EMR) template. The intervention was supported by the EMR template housing the Keele STarT MSK Tool (to stratify into low, medium and high-risk prognostic subgroups of persistent pain and disability) and recommended matched treatment options. Feasibility outcomes included exploration of recruitment and follow-up rates, selection bias, and GP intervention fidelity. To capture recommended outcomes including pain and function, participants completed an initial questionnaire, brief monthly questionnaire (postal or SMS), and 6-month follow-up questionnaire. An anonymised EMR audit described GP decision-making.
RESULTS
GPs screened 3063 patients (intervention = 1591, control = 1472), completed the EMR template with 1237 eligible patients (intervention = 513, control = 724) and 524 participants (42%) consented to data collection (intervention = 231, control = 293). Recruitment took 28 weeks (target 12 weeks) with > 90% follow-up retention (target > 75%). We detected no selection bias of concern and no harms identified. GP stratification tool fidelity failed to achieve a-priori success criteria, whilst fidelity to the matched treatments achieved "complete success".
CONCLUSIONS
A future definitive cluster RCT of stratified care for MSK pain is feasible and is underway, following key amendments including a clinician-completed version of the stratification tool and refinements to recommended matched treatments.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Name of the registry: ISRCTN.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
15366334. Date of registration: 06/04/2016.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32046647
doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1074-9
pii: 10.1186/s12875-019-1074-9
pmc: PMC7014664
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics 0
Nonprescription Drugs 0

Banques de données

ISRCTN
['ISRCTN15366334']

Types de publication

Journal Article Pragmatic Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

30

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR-RP-011-015
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-1211-20010
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Programme Grants for Applied Research
ID : RP-PG-1211-20010
Pays : International

Références

Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):537-44
pubmed: 26553893
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 17;7(1):e012901
pubmed: 28096253
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Nov;61(592):657-8
pubmed: 22054314
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94
pubmed: 15485730
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Nov;58(556):790-7, i-vi
pubmed: 19000402
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2791-2803
pubmed: 29971708
Spine J. 2011 Jul;11(7):622-32
pubmed: 21601533
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2368-2383
pubmed: 29573872
Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):110-6
pubmed: 22507360
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jun 1;20(1):271
pubmed: 31153364
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;54(2):79-86
pubmed: 30826805
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Aug;64(8):1217-24
pubmed: 22422737
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800
pubmed: 26063472
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 12;17:277
pubmed: 27405870
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Feb 8;170(3):271-7
pubmed: 20142573
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Oct 27;3:22
pubmed: 14580266
Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):37-43
pubmed: 22579043
Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2323-2330
pubmed: 27059888
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Nov;71(11):1796-802
pubmed: 22492783
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70
pubmed: 20046623
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1603-1658
pubmed: 27733283
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 05;6(8):e012331
pubmed: 27496243
Lancet. 2005 Jun 11-17;365(9476):2024-30
pubmed: 15950716
J Physiother. 2011;57(3):197
pubmed: 21843839
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8):1460-2
pubmed: 22481127
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1039-56
pubmed: 26071431
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;35(5):1292-300
pubmed: 16943232
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;54(11):642-651
pubmed: 30760458
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):632-41
pubmed: 18438893
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Oct 1;27(19):2116-23; discussion 2124
pubmed: 12394923
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3130-9
pubmed: 11124729
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0178621
pubmed: 28640822
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Mar 24;7:21
pubmed: 16563164
Clin J Pain. 2013 May;29(5):411-6
pubmed: 23549065
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):141-4
pubmed: 6222486
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17
pubmed: 19521015
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 14;6(10):e012445
pubmed: 27742627
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(41):1-253, iii-iv
pubmed: 20807469
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jan;66(1):147-56
pubmed: 24376249
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Aug;57(541):655-61
pubmed: 17688762
Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71
pubmed: 21963002
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Jul - Aug;22(4):255-264
pubmed: 29970301
BMJ. 2004 Dec 11;329(7479):1377
pubmed: 15556955
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;28(1):119-42
pubmed: 24792948
BMJ. 2008 Dec 11;337:a2656
pubmed: 19074232
Pain Med. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):1500-1508
pubmed: 30615172
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):31
pubmed: 32046656
Eur J Pain. 2021 Nov;25(10):2081-2093
pubmed: 34101299
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 May;16(5):542-50
pubmed: 18294869
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Oct;68(10):1443-52
pubmed: 26991934
BMJ. 2009 Oct 09;339:b4006
pubmed: 19819928
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2384-2388
pubmed: 29573871
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 02;11:144
pubmed: 20598124
BMJ. 2016 Feb 17;352:i942
pubmed: 26887896
Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 Feb 29;14(1):205
pubmed: 22404958

Auteurs

J C Hill (JC)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK. j.hill@keele.ac.uk.

S Garvin (S)

Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK.

Y Chen (Y)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK.

V Cooper (V)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

S Wathall (S)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK.

B Saunders (B)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

M Lewis (M)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK.

J Protheroe (J)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

A Chudyk (A)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

K M Dunn (KM)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

E Hay (E)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

D van der Windt (D)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

C Mallen (C)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

N E Foster (NE)

Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH