Tympanomeatal flap creation in endoscopic stapedotomy: cautery vs. cold instrumentation.
Bleeding
Cautery
Cold instrument
Endoscopic stapedotomy
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
28
09
2019
accepted:
04
02
2020
pubmed:
13
2
2020
medline:
16
2
2021
entrez:
13
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bleeding is one of the most challenging issues for surgeons performing endoscopic stapedotomy. During creation and elevation of the tympanomeatal flap (TMF) prevention or control of bleeding greatly facilitates the safety and comfort in the next steps of the surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of cautery versus cold instrumentation during creation of TMF at endoscopic stapedotomy surgery. We investigated 15 patients TMF created with cautery and 14 patients with cold instrument, and compared bleeding scores, operation time, postoperative hearing, pain and complications between groups. The mean bleeding score was significantly lower in cautery incised patients compared to cold instrument patients (1.2 ± 0.9 vs. 2.3 ± 1, p = 0.005). Mean duration of surgery was also significantly shorter in cautery used patients (35.3 ± 6.8 vs. 48.8 ± 9.2 min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between postoperative pain, complications, wound healing, and auditory outcomes. Cautery may be a better choice for the creation of TMF in endoscopic stapedotomy surgery due to reduced bleeding, shorter operation time and increased comfort without causing any complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32048030
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05847-6
pii: 10.1007/s00405-020-05847-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1061-1066Références
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jul;37(6):680-4
pubmed: 26945318
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1350-7
pubmed: 27579838
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Sep;113(3):186-7
pubmed: 7675477
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov-Dec;77(6):721-7
pubmed: 22183278
Can J Anaesth. 1995 May;42(5 Pt 1):373-6
pubmed: 7614641
Otol Neurotol. 2006 Dec;27(8 Suppl 2):S25-47
pubmed: 16985478
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;270(4):1547-9
pubmed: 23463349
Anesthesiol Clin. 2010 Sep;28(3):519-28
pubmed: 20850082
Laryngoscope. 2000 May;110(5 Pt 2 Suppl 95):1-37
pubmed: 10807349
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Oct;157(4):700-706
pubmed: 28871844
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017 Jun;44(3):253-257
pubmed: 27461175
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jan;124(1):266-71
pubmed: 23670854