2005 Guidelines on targets for solute and fluid removal in adults being treated with chronic peritoneal dialysis: 2019 Update of the literature and revision of recommendations.
Adequacy
Kt/V
peritoneal clearance
residual renal function
ultrafiltration
Journal
Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
ISSN: 1718-4304
Titre abrégé: Perit Dial Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8904033
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
13
2
2020
medline:
8
6
2021
entrez:
13
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines for small solute clearance and fluid removal in peritoneal dialysis (PD) were published in 2005. The aim of this article is to update those guidelines by reviewing the literature that supported those guidelines and examining publications since then. An extensive search of publications was performed through electronic databases and a hand search through reference lists from the existing guideline and selected articles. There have been no prospective intervention trials to inform the area of small solute clearance in PD since the publication of the original guideline in 2005. The trials to date are largely limited to a few prospective cohort studies and retrospective studies. These have, however, consistently demonstrated that residual renal function (RRF) is more often associated with patient outcome than peritoneal clearance. One of the few randomised controlled trials performed in this area does suggest that a weekly There continues to be very poor evidence in the area of small solute clearance and fluid removal in PD. The evidence that exists suggests that RRF is more important than peritoneal clearance and that there appears to be no survival advantage in aiming for a weekly
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines for small solute clearance and fluid removal in peritoneal dialysis (PD) were published in 2005. The aim of this article is to update those guidelines by reviewing the literature that supported those guidelines and examining publications since then.
METHODS
An extensive search of publications was performed through electronic databases and a hand search through reference lists from the existing guideline and selected articles.
RESULTS
There have been no prospective intervention trials to inform the area of small solute clearance in PD since the publication of the original guideline in 2005. The trials to date are largely limited to a few prospective cohort studies and retrospective studies. These have, however, consistently demonstrated that residual renal function (RRF) is more often associated with patient outcome than peritoneal clearance. One of the few randomised controlled trials performed in this area does suggest that a weekly
CONCLUSIONS
There continues to be very poor evidence in the area of small solute clearance and fluid removal in PD. The evidence that exists suggests that RRF is more important than peritoneal clearance and that there appears to be no survival advantage in aiming for a weekly
Identifiants
pubmed: 32048566
doi: 10.1177/0896860819898307
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Practice Guideline
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM