Personal and social patterns predict influenza vaccination decision.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
Decision Making
Female
Health Behavior
Humans
Infant
Influenza Vaccines
/ administration & dosage
Influenza, Human
/ prevention & control
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Psychological
Retrospective Studies
Seasons
Social Behavior
Vaccination
/ psychology
Young Adult
Influenza
Influenza vaccination
Prediction
Vaccination behavior
Vaccination coverage
Vaccine refusal
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Feb 2020
12 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
04
12
2019
accepted:
05
02
2020
entrez:
14
2
2020
pubmed:
14
2
2020
medline:
29
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Seasonal influenza vaccination coverage remains suboptimal in most developed countries, despite longstanding recommendations of public health organizations. The individual's decision regarding vaccination is located at the core of non-adherence. We analyzed large-scale data to identify personal and social behavioral patterns for influenza vaccination uptake, and develop a model to predict vaccination decision of individuals in an upcoming influenza season. We analyzed primary data from the electronic medical records of a retrospective cohort of 250,000 individuals between the years 2007 and 2017, collected from 137 clinics. Individuals were randomly sampled from the database of Maccabi Healthcare Services. Maccabi's clients are representative of the Israeli population, reflect all demographic, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups and levels. We used several machine-learning models to predict whether a patient would get vaccinated in the future. Models' performance was evaluated based on the area under the ROC curve. The vaccination decision of an individual can be explained in two dimensions, Personal and social. The personal dimension is strongly shaped by a "default" behavior, such as vaccination timing in previous seasons and general health consumption, but can also be affected by temporal factors such as respiratory illness in the prior year. In the social dimension, a patient is more likely to become vaccinated in a given season if at least one member of his family also became vaccinated in the same season. Vaccination uptake was highly assertive with age, socioeconomic score, and geographic location. An XGBoost-based predictive model achieved an ROC-AUC score of 0.91 with accuracy and recall rates of 90% on the test set. Prediction relied mainly on the patient's individual and household vaccination status in the past, age, number of encounters with the healthcare system, number of prescribed medications, and indicators of chronic illnesses. Our ability to make an excellent prediction of the patient's decision sets a major step toward personalized influenza vaccination campaigns, and will help shape the next generation of targeted vaccination efforts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Seasonal influenza vaccination coverage remains suboptimal in most developed countries, despite longstanding recommendations of public health organizations. The individual's decision regarding vaccination is located at the core of non-adherence. We analyzed large-scale data to identify personal and social behavioral patterns for influenza vaccination uptake, and develop a model to predict vaccination decision of individuals in an upcoming influenza season.
METHODS
METHODS
We analyzed primary data from the electronic medical records of a retrospective cohort of 250,000 individuals between the years 2007 and 2017, collected from 137 clinics. Individuals were randomly sampled from the database of Maccabi Healthcare Services. Maccabi's clients are representative of the Israeli population, reflect all demographic, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups and levels. We used several machine-learning models to predict whether a patient would get vaccinated in the future. Models' performance was evaluated based on the area under the ROC curve.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The vaccination decision of an individual can be explained in two dimensions, Personal and social. The personal dimension is strongly shaped by a "default" behavior, such as vaccination timing in previous seasons and general health consumption, but can also be affected by temporal factors such as respiratory illness in the prior year. In the social dimension, a patient is more likely to become vaccinated in a given season if at least one member of his family also became vaccinated in the same season. Vaccination uptake was highly assertive with age, socioeconomic score, and geographic location. An XGBoost-based predictive model achieved an ROC-AUC score of 0.91 with accuracy and recall rates of 90% on the test set. Prediction relied mainly on the patient's individual and household vaccination status in the past, age, number of encounters with the healthcare system, number of prescribed medications, and indicators of chronic illnesses.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our ability to make an excellent prediction of the patient's decision sets a major step toward personalized influenza vaccination campaigns, and will help shape the next generation of targeted vaccination efforts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32050948
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8327-3
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-8327-3
pmc: PMC7017468
doi:
Substances chimiques
Influenza Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
222Subventions
Organisme : Israel Science Foundation
ID : 3409/19
Références
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 May 22;10(5):e1003643
pubmed: 24851863
World Health Stat Q. 1992;45(2-3):306-11
pubmed: 1462665
Sci Rep. 2016 May 17;6:26094
pubmed: 27185194
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Mar;7(3):853-69
pubmed: 20617008
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2018 Jan;12(1):132-137
pubmed: 29446233
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2014 Apr 25;3:13
pubmed: 24872874
Prev Med. 1999 Oct;29(4):249-62
pubmed: 10547050
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):198-208
pubmed: 27189013
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2018 Aug 24;67(3):1-20
pubmed: 30141464
Vaccine. 2014 Jul 16;32(33):4198-205
pubmed: 24930716
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 04;10(3):e0118369
pubmed: 25738736
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Aug 27;59(33):1057-62
pubmed: 20798667
JAMA. 2004 Sep 15;292(11):1333-40
pubmed: 15367555
Vaccine. 2009 Jun 19;27(30):4018-24
pubmed: 19389442
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 07;14:813
pubmed: 25103091
Health Psychol. 2007 Mar;26(2):136-45
pubmed: 17385964
Health Psychol. 2006 Jan;25(1):82-90
pubmed: 16448301
Vaccine. 2003 May 1;21(16):1769-75
pubmed: 12686092
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54445
pubmed: 23457451
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 29;11(10):e1004513
pubmed: 26513245
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S106-13
pubmed: 20473190