Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter in female with neurological stress urinary incontinence: a long-term follow-up.
Artificial urinary sphincter
Intrinsic sphincter deficiency
Neurological patients
Outcomes
Stress urinary incontinence
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
29
12
2019
accepted:
22
01
2020
pubmed:
14
2
2020
medline:
6
8
2021
entrez:
14
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To report the outcomes of AUS in women with neurological SUI resulting from intrinsic sphincter deficiency after a follow-up from 3 to 20 years. The charts of female with moderate to severe neurological SUI who underwent open or laparoscopic AUS implantation between November 1994 and July 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were operated by a single experienced surgeon. Primary endpoint was a postoperative continence categorized as complete continence (no pads used), improved incontinence or unchanged incontinence. Twenty-three women (mean age 54 years, range 19-77) underwent open or laparoscopic AUS implantation. At the last follow-up, 7 (30.4%) initial artificial urinary sphincters remained in situ and 9 (39.1%) patients had at least one revision or reimplantation. Sixteen patients were fully continent (69.6%), four (17.4%) had improved incontinence and three (13.0%) had unchanged incontinence. After a median follow-up of 11.6 years (3-22), 8 (34.8%) explanations in 7 patients and 16 (69.6%) revisions in 11 patients occurred. The average time without explanation or revision was 10.9 and 8.5 years, respectively. Survival rates without AUS explanation were 94.4%, 76.5%, 72.8%, 50% and without revision were 83.3%, 64.7%, 45.5% and 16.7% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, respectively. Although all methods are imperfect at best, AUS remain toward our experience a good way to achieve long-term continence in female patients suffering from neurological SUI with preserved manual dexterity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32052128
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03105-2
pii: 10.1007/s00345-020-03105-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
157-162Références
Phé V, Léon P, Granger B et al (2017) Stress urinary incontinence in female neurological patients: long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800TM ) implantation. Neurourol Urodyn 36:764–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23019
doi: 10.1002/nau.23019
pubmed: 27080729
Reus CR, Phé V, Dechartres A et al (2018) Performance and safety of the artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800) for non-neurogenic women with urinary incontinence secondary to intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.009
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.009
pubmed: 30389312
Groen J, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D et al (2016) Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on neuro-urology. Eur Urol 69:324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.071
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.071
pubmed: 26304502
Light JK, Scott FB (1985) Management of urinary incontinence in women with the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 134:476–478
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)47245-4
Ferreira C, Brychaert P-E, Menard J, Mandron E (2017) Laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: mid-term outcomes. Int J Urol 24:308–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13296
doi: 10.1111/iju.13296
pubmed: 28215049
Biardeau X, Rizk J, Marcelli F, Flamand V (2015) Robot-assisted laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in 11 women with urinary stress incontinence: surgical technique and initial experience. Eur Urol 67:937–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.041
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.041
pubmed: 25582931
Peyronnet B, Capon G, Belas O et al (2019) Robot-assisted AMS-800 artificial urinary sphincter bladder neck implantation in female patients with stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 75:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.036
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.036
pubmed: 30139632
Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM et al (1999) Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL). Urology 53:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00454-3
doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00454-3
pubmed: 9886591
Tricard T, Jochum F, Bergerat S et al (2019) Outcomes of open artificial urinary sphincter in women with stress urinary incontinence: long-term follow up. Ther Adv Urol 11:1756287219874676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287219874676
doi: 10.1177/1756287219874676
pubmed: 31555345
pmcid: 6747852
Mandron E, Bryckaert P-E, Papatsoris AG (2010) Laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter implantation for female genuine stress urinary incontinence: technique and 4-year experience in 25 patients. BJU Int 106:1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09206.x (discussion 1198)
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09206.x
pubmed: 20132197
Hampel C, Artibani W, Pons ME et al (2004) Understanding the burden of stress urinary incontinence in Europe: a qualitative review of the literature. Eur Urol 46:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.02.003
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.02.003
pubmed: 15183544
Dmochowski RR, Blaivas JM, Gormley EA et al (2010) Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 183:1906–1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2369
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2369
pubmed: 20303102
Vayleux B, Rigaud J, Luyckx F et al (2011) Female urinary incontinence and artificial urinary sphincter: study of efficacy and risk factors for failure and complications. Eur Urol 59:1048–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.006
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.006
pubmed: 21420781
Venn SN, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR (2000) The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol 164:702–706 (discussion 706–707)
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67285-0
Thomas K, Venn SN, Mundy AR (2002) Outcome of the artificial urinary sphincter in female patients. J Urol 167:1720–1722
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65185-3
Costa P, Poinas G, Ben Naoum K et al (2013) Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter for women with type III stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 63:753–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.008
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.008
pubmed: 22445222
Petero VG, Diokno AC (2006) Comparison of the long-term outcomes between incontinent men and women treated with artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 175:605–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00243-0
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00243-0
pubmed: 16407005
Phé V, Benadiba S, Rouprêt M et al (2014) Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 113:961–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12360
doi: 10.1111/bju.12360
pubmed: 24053369
Chung E, Cartmill RA (2010) 25-year experience in the outcome of artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. BJU Int 106:1664–1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09419.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09419.x
pubmed: 20500509
Peyronnet B, O’Connor E, Khavari R et al (2018) AMS-800 artificial urinary sphincter in female patients with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23833
doi: 10.1002/nau.23833
pubmed: 30575995
Peyronnet B, Vincendeau S, Tondut L et al (2016) Artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence: preliminary comparison of robot-assisted and open approaches. Int Urogynecology J 27:475–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2858-7
doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2858-7