SAGES masters program: determining the seminal articles for each pathway.
Anchoring
Masters
Pathways
Seminal
Surgery
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
04
12
2019
accepted:
22
01
2020
pubmed:
14
2
2020
medline:
25
5
2021
entrez:
14
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) has recently developed and announced its Masters Program that aims to address existing needs of practicing surgeons for lifelong learning and consists of eight clinical pathways each containing three anchoring procedures. The objective of this study was to select the seminal articles for each anchoring procedure of these pathways using a systematic methodology. A systematic literature search of Web of Science was conducted for the most cited articles for each of the anchoring procedures of the SAGES Masters pathways. The most relevant identified articles were then reviewed by expert members of the relevant SAGES pathway committees and task forces and the seminal articles chosen for each anchoring procedure using expert consensus. 578 highly cited articles were identified by the original search of the literature and the seminal articles were selected for each anchoring procedure after expert review and consensus. Articles address procedural outcomes, disease pathophysiology, and surgical technique and are presented in this paper. We have identified seminal articles for each anchoring procedure of the SAGES Masters program pathways using a systematic methodology. These articles provide surgeon participants of this program with a great resource to improve their procedure-specific knowledge and may further benefit the larger surgical community by focusing its attention to must-read impactful work that may inform best practices.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) has recently developed and announced its Masters Program that aims to address existing needs of practicing surgeons for lifelong learning and consists of eight clinical pathways each containing three anchoring procedures. The objective of this study was to select the seminal articles for each anchoring procedure of these pathways using a systematic methodology.
METHODS
A systematic literature search of Web of Science was conducted for the most cited articles for each of the anchoring procedures of the SAGES Masters pathways. The most relevant identified articles were then reviewed by expert members of the relevant SAGES pathway committees and task forces and the seminal articles chosen for each anchoring procedure using expert consensus.
RESULTS
578 highly cited articles were identified by the original search of the literature and the seminal articles were selected for each anchoring procedure after expert review and consensus. Articles address procedural outcomes, disease pathophysiology, and surgical technique and are presented in this paper.
CONCLUSIONS
We have identified seminal articles for each anchoring procedure of the SAGES Masters program pathways using a systematic methodology. These articles provide surgeon participants of this program with a great resource to improve their procedure-specific knowledge and may further benefit the larger surgical community by focusing its attention to must-read impactful work that may inform best practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32052149
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07392-z
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07392-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1465-1481Références
Jones DB, Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dimick JB, Jacob BP, Schultz L, Scott DJ (2017) SAGES University MASTERS Program: a structured curriculum for deliberate, lifelong learning. Surg Endosc 31:3061–3071
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5626-6
Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL (February 1980) A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. DTIC ADA084551. University of California/Berkeley Operations Research Center
Azer SA (2015) The top-cited articles in medical education: a bibliometric analysis. Acad Med 90:1147–1161
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000780
Heldwein FL, Rhoden EL, Morgentaler A (2010) Classics of urology: a half century history of the most frequently cited articles (1955–2009). Urology 75:1261–1268
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.043
Lefaivre KA, Shadgan B, O’Brien PJ (2011) 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1487–1497
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1604-1
Cassar Gheiti AJ, Downey RE, Byrne DP, Molony DC, Mulhall KJ (2012) The 25 most cited articles in arthroscopic orthopaedic surgery. Arthroscopy 28:548–564
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.312
Munzer BW, Love J, Shipman BL, Byrne B, Cico SJ, Furlong R, Khandelwal S, Santen SA (2017) An analysis of the top-cited articles in emergency medicine education literature. West J Emerg Med 18:60–68
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31492
Joyce CW, Carroll SM (2014) Microsurgery: the top 50 classic papers in plastic surgery: a citation analysis. Arch Plast Surg 41:153–157
doi: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.153
Kelly JC, Glynn RW, O’Briain DE, Felle P, McCabe JP (2010) The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1338–1343
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24867
Garfield E, Cawkell AE (1975) Citation analysis studies. Science 189(4200):397. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4200.397
doi: 10.1126/science.189.4200.397
Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber R (2002) Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA 287:2847–2850
doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2847
Seglen PO (1997) Citations and journal impact factors: Questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy 52:1050–1056
doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb00175.x