Comparison of the TIMI, GRACE, PAMI and CADILLAC risk scores for prediction of long-term cardiovascular outcomes in Taiwanese diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: From the registry of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
09
05
2019
accepted:
02
02
2020
entrez:
14
2
2020
pubmed:
14
2
2020
medline:
10
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with diabetes have significantly worse cardiovascular outcomes than those without diabetes. This study aimed to compare the performance of The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI), and Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) risk scores in predicting long-term cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). From the Acute Coronary Syndrome-Diabetes Mellitus Registry of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology, patients with STEMI were included. The TIMI, GRACE, PAMI, and CADILLAC risk scores were calculated. The discriminative potential of risk scores was analyzed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC). In the 455 patients included, all four risk score systems demonstrated predictive accuracy for 6-, 12- and 24-month mortality with AUC values of 0.67-0.82. The CADILLAC score had the best discriminative accuracy, with an AUC of 0.8207 (p<0.0001), 0.8210 (p<0.0001), and 0.8192 (p<0.0001) for 6-, 12-, and 24-month mortality, respectively. It also had the best predictive value for bleeding and acute renal failure, with an AUC of 0.7919 (p<0.05) and 0.9764 (p<0.0001), respectively. Patients with CADILLAC risk scores >8 had poorer 2-year survival than those with lower scores (log-rank p<0.0001). In conclusion, the CADILLAC risk score is more effective than other risk scores in predicting 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year all-cause mortality in diabetic patients with STEMI. It also had the best predictive value for in-hospital bleeding and acute renal failure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32053694
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229186
pii: PONE-D-19-13226
pmc: PMC7018102
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0229186Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
JAMA. 2011 Apr 27;305(16):1677-84
pubmed: 21521849
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 4;52(19):1527-39
pubmed: 19007588
Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):839-43
pubmed: 6878708
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 20;56(4):254-63
pubmed: 20633817
Circulation. 2012 Oct 16;126(16):2020-35
pubmed: 22923432
Korean Circ J. 2018 Feb;48(2):134-147
pubmed: 29441746
Eur Heart J. 2006 Oct;27(19):2285-93
pubmed: 16908490
JAMA. 2007 May 2;297(17):1892-900
pubmed: 17473299
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016 Jan;32(1):31-8
pubmed: 27171367
World J Diabetes. 2015 Oct 10;6(13):1246-58
pubmed: 26468341
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Aug;29(6):1215-28
pubmed: 23443340
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0123215
pubmed: 25893501
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Jan 29;2(1):e003269
pubmed: 23525425
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2727-33
pubmed: 15187054
Am J Med. 2011 Jan;124(1):40-7
pubmed: 21187184
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 1;111(1):12-20
pubmed: 23040595
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 15;119(12):1917-1923
pubmed: 28427734
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 3;45(9):1397-405
pubmed: 15862409
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 8;55(23):2556-66
pubmed: 20513595
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Dec;38(7):2114-30
pubmed: 11738323
Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Jan;115(1):92-106
pubmed: 7055134
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 1;102(1):6-11
pubmed: 18572028
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228
pubmed: 25260718
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2018 May;34(3):211-223
pubmed: 29844642
Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R204-12
pubmed: 15312219
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Aug;12(4):330-6
pubmed: 22694809
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;148(1):70-5
pubmed: 19923016