Manure Compost Is a Potential Source of Tetracycline-Resistant
antimicrobial resistance
manure compost
residual antimicrobials
tetracyclines
Journal
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2079-6382
Titre abrégé: Antibiotics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101637404
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Feb 2020
11 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
27
01
2020
revised:
10
02
2020
accepted:
10
02
2020
entrez:
15
2
2020
pubmed:
15
2
2020
medline:
15
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Manure compost has been thought of as a potential important route of transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) from livestock to humans. To clarify the abundance of ARB and ARGs, ARB and ARGs were quantitatively determined in tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli (harboring the tetA gene)-spiked feces in simulated composts. In the simulated composts, the concentration of spiked E. coli decreased below the detection limit at day 7. The tetA gene remained in manure compost for 20 days, although the levels of the gene decreased. Next, to clarify the field conditions of manure compost in Japan, the quantities of tetracycline-resistant bacteria, tetracycline resistance genes, and residual tetracyclines were determined using field-manure-matured composts in livestock farms. Tetracycline-resistant bacteria were detected in 54.5% of tested matured compost (6/11 farms). The copy number of the tetA gene and the concentrations of residual tetracyclines in field manure compost were significantly correlated. These results suggest that the use of antimicrobials in livestock constitutes a selective pressure, not only in livestock feces but also in manure compost. The appropriate use of antimicrobials in livestock and treatment of manure compost are important for avoiding the spread of ARB and ARGs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32054107
pii: antibiotics9020076
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020076
pmc: PMC7168215
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
ID : 19H04285
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Front Microbiol. 2015 May 29;6:536
pubmed: 26074912
Microb Drug Resist. 2016 Jun;22(4):336-41
pubmed: 26683492
Bioresour Technol. 2009 Nov;100(22):5374-8
pubmed: 19231164
Chemosphere. 2006 Oct;65(5):725-59
pubmed: 16677683
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011 Jun;14(3):236-43
pubmed: 21546307
Microb Ecol. 2012 Jan;63(1):32-40
pubmed: 21811793
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jun 5;370(1670):20140083
pubmed: 25918441
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Dec 1;44(23):9128-33
pubmed: 21058743
Front Microbiol. 2016 May 12;7:710
pubmed: 27433156
Science. 2013 Sep 27;341(6153):1460-1
pubmed: 24030495
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Sep;57(5):704-10
pubmed: 23723195
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Feb 28;145(2-3):407-13
pubmed: 21324543
J Environ Qual. 2016 Mar;45(2):537-45
pubmed: 27065401
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Mar;23(5):4551-60
pubmed: 26517996
Rev Sci Tech. 1991 Sep;10(3):813-46
pubmed: 1782431
Microb Drug Resist. 2015 Oct;21(5):562-9
pubmed: 26061440
Vet Microbiol. 2010 May 19;142(3-4):329-36
pubmed: 19939589
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Dec;245(Pt A):549-559
pubmed: 28898855
Anaerobe. 2017 Feb;43:15-20
pubmed: 27871997