Potential for diagnosis of infectious disease from the 100,000 Genomes Project Metagenomic Dataset: Recommendations for reporting results.

full-genome sequencing incidental findings metagenomics pathogens

Journal

Wellcome open research
ISSN: 2398-502X
Titre abrégé: Wellcome Open Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101696457

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
accepted: 07 10 2019
entrez: 15 2 2020
pubmed: 15 2 2020
medline: 15 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The identification of microbiological infection is usually a diagnostic investigation, a complex process that is firstly initiated by clinical suspicion. With the emergence of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies, metagenomic analysis has unveiled the power to identify microbial DNA/RNA from a diverse range of clinical samples (1). Metagenomic analysis of whole human genomes at the clinical/research interface bypasses the steps of clinical scrutiny and targeted testing and has the potential to generate unexpected findings relating to infectious and sometimes transmissible disease. There is no doubt that microbial findings that may have a significant impact on a patient's treatment and their close contacts should be reported to those with clinical responsibility for the sample-donating patient. There are no clear recommendations on how such findings that are incidental, or outside the original investigation, should be handled. Here we aim to provide an informed protocol for the management of incidental microbial findings as part of the 100,000 Genomes Project which may have broader application in this emerging field. As with any other clinical information, we aim to prioritise the reporting of data that are most likely to be of benefit to the patient and their close contacts. We also set out to minimize risks, costs and potential anxiety associated with the reporting of results that are unlikely to be of clinical significance. Our recommendations aim to support the practice of microbial metagenomics by providing a simplified pathway that can be applied to reporting the identification of potential pathogens from metagenomic datasets. Given that the ambition for UK sequenced human genomes over the next 5 years has been set to reach 5 million and the field of metagenomics is rapidly evolving, the guidance will be regularly reviewed and will likely adapt over time as experience develops.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32055707
doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15499.1
pmc: PMC6993825
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

155

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2019 Magiorkinis G et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No competing interests were disclosed.

Références

PLoS Pathog. 2017 Mar 22;13(3):e1006292
pubmed: 28328962
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 02;10(9):e0135193
pubmed: 26332594
Nature. 2014 Mar 20;507(7492):294-5
pubmed: 24646979
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Oct;54(10):2470-84
pubmed: 27385709
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 23;7(1):4173
pubmed: 28646219
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Sep 22;265(1407):1779-86
pubmed: 9787470
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Sep 15;180(6):562-4
pubmed: 25150271
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jun;55(6):1789-1801
pubmed: 28356418
J Med Genet. 2014 Nov;51(11):715-23
pubmed: 25228303
CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):655-6
pubmed: 24688013
Genome Med. 2018 Dec 24;10(1):99
pubmed: 30583724
BMC Biol. 2014 Nov 12;12:87
pubmed: 25387460
Syst Biol. 2006 Oct;55(5):774-84
pubmed: 17060199
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Mar 1;35(3):719-733
pubmed: 29186559
Eur J Clin Invest. 2008 Nov;38(11):845-8
pubmed: 19021702
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):373-8
pubmed: 21053091
Genome Med. 2013 Sep 20;5(9):81
pubmed: 24050114
BMJ. 2016 Apr 13;353:i1757
pubmed: 27075170
Wellcome Open Res. 2017 Nov 30;2:114
pubmed: 30009267
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 13;112(41):12764-9
pubmed: 26385966
J Virol. 2010 Oct;84(19):9733-48
pubmed: 20660197
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Oct 14;4:155
pubmed: 32055707
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Mar;15(3):161-168
pubmed: 28134265

Auteurs

Gkikas Magiorkinis (G)

Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece.

Philippa C Matthews (PC)

University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Susan E Wallace (SE)

University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Katie Jeffery (K)

University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Kevin Dunbar (K)

Public Health England, London, UK.

Richard Tedder (R)

Imperial College London, London, UK.

Jean L Mbisa (JL)

Public Health England, London, UK.

Bernadette Hannigan (B)

Public Health England, London, UK.
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Effy Vayena (E)

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland.

Peter Simmonds (P)

University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Daniel S Brewer (DS)

University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Earlham Institute, Norwich, UK.

Abraham Gihawi (A)

University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Ghanasyam Rallapalli (G)

University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Lea Lahnstein (L)

Genomics England, London, UK.

Tom Fowler (T)

Genomics England, London, UK.

Christine Patch (C)

Genomics England, London, UK.

Fiona Maleady-Crowe (F)

Genomics England, London, UK.

Anneke Lucassen (A)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Colin Cooper (C)

University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Classifications MeSH