Evaluation of computed tomography arterial portography scan timing using different bolus tracking methods.
Arteries
/ diagnostic imaging
Contrast Media
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Liver
/ blood supply
Liver Neoplasms
/ blood supply
Male
Portal Vein
/ diagnostic imaging
Portography
/ methods
Reproducibility of Results
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Vena Cava, Inferior
/ diagnostic imaging
Abdomen
CT-angiography
Cancer
Cirrhosis
Interventional radiology
Liver
Journal
Radiological physics and technology
ISSN: 1865-0341
Titre abrégé: Radiol Phys Technol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101467995
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
25
09
2019
accepted:
01
02
2020
revised:
30
01
2020
pubmed:
15
2
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
15
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Computed tomography arterial portography (CTAP) is widely used with a fixed scan timing and contrast medium quantity; however, these parameters are not necessarily optimal. In this study, CTAP scan timing was analyzed by different bolus tracking methods to monitor the inflow of the contrast medium in real-time. A total of 249 patients who underwent CTAP were assessed. In 30 patients, the CTAP scanning began 33 s after contrast medium injection started (fixed method). In 74 patients, the regions of interest (ROIs) were established at two places in the inferior vena cava above the hepatic vein (inferior vena cava-ROI method). In 145 patients, the ROI was established at two places in the liver parenchyma (liver parenchyma-ROI method). Scan timing was considered appropriate when the difference in the CT value between the hepatic and portal veins approached 0; this was observed significantly more with the liver parenchyma-ROI method than with the other methods. CTAP scan timing with the liver parenchyma-ROI method was better than that with the fixed and inferior vena cava-ROI methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32056063
doi: 10.1007/s12194-020-00556-5
pii: 10.1007/s12194-020-00556-5
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
92-97Références
Clin Radiol. 2008 Mar;63(3):263-71
pubmed: 18275866
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 7;22(9):2647-56
pubmed: 26973405
Radiology. 2010 Jan;254(1):47-66
pubmed: 20032142
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2014 Aug;70(8):805-13
pubmed: 25142392
Mol Imaging Biol. 2017 Jun;19(3):446-455
pubmed: 27787742
Eur Radiol. 2001;11(8):1396-400
pubmed: 11519548
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Oct;17(10):927-35
pubmed: 26258662
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2014 Aug;4(Suppl 3):S63-6
pubmed: 25755613
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1305-13
pubmed: 23629602
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2000 Oct;30(10):440-5
pubmed: 11185890
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 15;9(7):e101944
pubmed: 25025151
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Mar;31(3):539-49
pubmed: 10709068
Radiology. 2010 Dec;257(3):705-14
pubmed: 20843994
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):361-7
pubmed: 26268303
Visc Med. 2017 Dec;33(6):449-454
pubmed: 29344519
Liver Cancer. 2014 May;3(2):97-107
pubmed: 24945000
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Apr;174(4):947-54
pubmed: 10749228
Dig Dis. 2014;32(6):690-5
pubmed: 25376285
Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 Jan;47(1):13-26
pubmed: 19195531
Radiology. 1995 May;195(2):353-7
pubmed: 7724752
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Jul;169(1):131-5
pubmed: 9207512
Hepatol Int. 2010 Jul 25;4(3):562-8
pubmed: 21063478
World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov 1;10(21):3118-21
pubmed: 15457555