In the Era After the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 'Boost' Study, is the Additional Radiotherapy to the Breast Tumour Bed Still Beneficial for Young Women?


Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 28 03 2019
revised: 02 12 2019
accepted: 04 12 2019
pubmed: 15 2 2020
medline: 23 2 2021
entrez: 15 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22,881-10,882 trial showed significant benefit of a radiotherapy boost (RTB) in women ≤40 years in a pre-hormone therapy (HT) era. We determined how the use of HT and RTB changed in response to clinical guidelines and whether the benefit of routine RTB was still observed in the HT era. Between 1996 and 2004, a provincial database identified all women ≤40 years with breast cancer who met the inclusion criteria of the EORTC trial. In total, 411 patients were classified into three eras defined by the guidelines: era 1 (discretionary HT, discretionary RTB); era 2 (routine HT, discretionary RTB); era 3 (routine HT, routine RTB). HT use, RTB use and cumulative incidence of local recurrence were calculated and compared across eras. HT use increased after the first policy change from 13% to 75% for oestrogen receptor-positive patients (P < 0.01). RTB use also increased from 33% to 76% following the second policy change (P < 0.01). At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 12% in era 1, 6% in era 2 and 6% in era 3 (era 2 versus era 3, P = 0.92). For patients in the routine HT era (eras 2 and 3 combined) there was no significant difference in local recurrence between RTB and 'no RTB' patients (6% versus 7%, P = 0.81). The routine use of HT and RTB increased significantly after new practice guidelines. Introduction of the HT guideline was associated with a 6% improvement in local recurrence at 10 years. No improvement in local recurrence was associated with the introduction of the RTB guideline in the HT era. The routine use of a boost in unselected young women with negative margins should be re-evaluated in the current HT era.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32057620
pii: S0936-6555(20)30025-X
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.01.025
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

373-381

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

L Beaton (L)

Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

E K Chan (EK)

Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

S Tyldesley (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

L Gondara (L)

Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

C Speers (C)

Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

A Nichol (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: anichol@bccancer.bc.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH