The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial.


Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 30 09 2019
accepted: 30 12 2019
entrez: 16 2 2020
pubmed: 16 2 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Eighty per cent of UK women have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help women stop smoking before their health is irreparably compromised. Smoking cessation during pregnancy helps protect infants from miscarriage, still birth, low birth weight, asthma, attention deficit disorder and adult cardiovascular disease. UK national guidelines highlight lack of evidence for effectiveness of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers quit. This includes a research recommendation: within a UK context, are incentives an acceptable, effective and cost-effective way to help pregnant women who smoke to quit? The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT) III is a pragmatic, 42-month, multi-centre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial of the effect on smoking status of adding to usual Stop Smoking Services (SSS) support, the offer of up to £400 of financial voucher incentives, compared with usual support alone, to quit smoking during pregnancy. Participants (n = 940) are pregnant smokers (age > 16 years, < 24 weeks pregnant, English speaking), who consent via telephone to take part and are willing to be followed-up in late pregnancy and 6 months after birth. The primary outcome is cotinine/anabasine-validated abstinence from smoking in late pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include engagement with SSS, quit rates at 4 weeks from agreed quit date and 6 months after birth, and birth weight. Outcomes will be analysed by intention to treat, and regression models will be used to compare treatment effects on outcomes. A meta-analysis will include data from the feasibility study in Glasgow. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness from a UK NHS perspective. Process evaluation using a case-study approach will identify opportunities to improve recruitment and learning for future implementation. Research questions include: what is the therapeutic efficacy of incentives; are incentives cost-effective; and what are the potential facilitators and barriers to implementing incentives in different parts of the UK? This phase III trial in Scotland, England and Northern Ireland follows a successful phase II trial in Glasgow, UK. The participating sites have diverse SSS that represent most cessation services in the UK and serve demographically varied populations. If found to be acceptable and cost-effective, this trial could demonstrate that financial incentives are effective and transferable to most UK SSS for pregnant women. Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN15236311. Registered on 9 October 2017.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Eighty per cent of UK women have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help women stop smoking before their health is irreparably compromised. Smoking cessation during pregnancy helps protect infants from miscarriage, still birth, low birth weight, asthma, attention deficit disorder and adult cardiovascular disease. UK national guidelines highlight lack of evidence for effectiveness of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers quit. This includes a research recommendation: within a UK context, are incentives an acceptable, effective and cost-effective way to help pregnant women who smoke to quit?
METHODS METHODS
The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT) III is a pragmatic, 42-month, multi-centre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial of the effect on smoking status of adding to usual Stop Smoking Services (SSS) support, the offer of up to £400 of financial voucher incentives, compared with usual support alone, to quit smoking during pregnancy. Participants (n = 940) are pregnant smokers (age > 16 years, < 24 weeks pregnant, English speaking), who consent via telephone to take part and are willing to be followed-up in late pregnancy and 6 months after birth. The primary outcome is cotinine/anabasine-validated abstinence from smoking in late pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include engagement with SSS, quit rates at 4 weeks from agreed quit date and 6 months after birth, and birth weight. Outcomes will be analysed by intention to treat, and regression models will be used to compare treatment effects on outcomes. A meta-analysis will include data from the feasibility study in Glasgow. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness from a UK NHS perspective. Process evaluation using a case-study approach will identify opportunities to improve recruitment and learning for future implementation. Research questions include: what is the therapeutic efficacy of incentives; are incentives cost-effective; and what are the potential facilitators and barriers to implementing incentives in different parts of the UK?
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
This phase III trial in Scotland, England and Northern Ireland follows a successful phase II trial in Glasgow, UK. The participating sites have diverse SSS that represent most cessation services in the UK and serve demographically varied populations. If found to be acceptable and cost-effective, this trial could demonstrate that financial incentives are effective and transferable to most UK SSS for pregnant women.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN15236311. Registered on 9 October 2017.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32059684
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4042-8
pii: 10.1186/s13063-019-4042-8
pmc: PMC7023794
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

183

Subventions

Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : HIPS/16/01
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : CSRD VA
ID : 1
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K025643/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C48006/A20863
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : HSC Research and Development Division
ID : COM/5352/17
Organisme : Lullaby Trust
ID : 272
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate
ID : HIPS/16/1
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 10/31/02
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chest Heart and Stroke Northern Ireland
ID : 2017_09

Références

BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 31;15:58
pubmed: 25636330
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Jan;14(1):75-8
pubmed: 22025545
Addiction. 2005 Mar;100(3):299-303
pubmed: 15733243
Trials. 2017 Jul 20;18(1):337
pubmed: 28728583
Early Hum Dev. 2007 Nov;83(11):727-32
pubmed: 17888593
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Apr 16;89(8):572-6
pubmed: 9106646
Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1331-40
pubmed: 21496916
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2010 Jan 21;5:1
pubmed: 20092650
Popul Trends. 2009 Summer;(136):10-20
pubmed: 19606596
BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586
pubmed: 23303884
BMJ. 2013 Jun 19;346:f3676
pubmed: 23783355
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e023213
pubmed: 30898797
Addiction. 2016 Feb;111(2):360-70
pubmed: 26370095
Qual Health Res. 2006 Mar;16(3):377-94
pubmed: 16449687
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 21;17(1):173
pubmed: 29268721
Br J Cancer. 2011 Dec 6;105 Suppl 2:S77-81
pubmed: 22158327
BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1519
pubmed: 15213107
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 18;4(7):e005524
pubmed: 25037645
Trials. 2012 Jul 20;13:113
pubmed: 22818493
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012 Jun;94(6):417-23
pubmed: 22511535
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(30):1-522, vii-viii
pubmed: 25897655
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1209-24
pubmed: 10591280
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34(1):37-45
pubmed: 21933796
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1717-27
pubmed: 23184421
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2509-14
pubmed: 23102753
Thorax. 2011 Oct;66(10):847-55
pubmed: 21325144
BMJ. 2015 Jan 27;350:h134
pubmed: 25627664
Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55 Suppl:S2-6
pubmed: 22554884
Early Hum Dev. 2003 Dec;75(1-2):21-33
pubmed: 14652157
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2:CD001055
pubmed: 28196405
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Oct;16(4):238-44
pubmed: 21965426
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Feb;56(2):119-27
pubmed: 11812811
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 17;7:CD004307
pubmed: 31313293

Auteurs

Lesley Sinclair (L)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.

Margaret McFadden (M)

Clinical R&D, Dykebar Hospital, Grahamstone Road, Paisley, PA2 7DE, UK.

Helen Tilbrook (H)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Alex Mitchell (A)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Ada Keding (A)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Judith Watson (J)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Linda Bauld (L)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.

Frank Kee (F)

Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK.

David Torgerson (D)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Catherine Hewitt (C)

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Jennifer McKell (J)

Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Pat Hoddinott (P)

NMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Fiona M Harris (FM)

NMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Isabelle Uny (I)

Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Kathleen Boyd (K)

Health Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.

Nicola McMeekin (N)

Health Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.

Michael Ussher (M)

Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.

David M Tappin (DM)

Scottish Cot Death Trust, West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, Glasgow University, 5th Floor, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK. david.tappin@glasgow.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH