Automated Meningioma Segmentation in Multiparametric MRI : Comparable Effectiveness of a Deep Learning Model and Manual Segmentation.
Brain neoplasms
Deep learning
Magnetic resonance imaging
Meningioma
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
16
09
2019
accepted:
27
01
2020
pubmed:
16
2
2020
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
16
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Volumetric assessment of meningiomas represents a valuable tool for treatment planning and evaluation of tumor growth as it enables a more precise assessment of tumor size than conventional diameter methods. This study established a dedicated meningioma deep learning model based on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and evaluated its performance for automated tumor segmentation. The MRI datasets included T1-weighted/T2-weighted, T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1CE) and FLAIR of 126 patients with intracranial meningiomas (grade I: 97, grade II: 29). For automated segmentation, an established deep learning model architecture (3D deep convolutional neural network, DeepMedic, BioMedIA) operating on all four MR sequences was used. Segmentation included the following two components: (i) contrast-enhancing tumor volume in T1CE and (ii) total lesion volume (union of lesion volume in T1CE and FLAIR, including solid tumor parts and surrounding edema). Preprocessing of imaging data included registration, skull stripping, resampling, and normalization. After training of the deep learning model using manual segmentations by 2 independent readers from 70 patients (training group), the algorithm was evaluated on 56 patients (validation group) by comparing automated to ground truth manual segmentations, which were performed by 2 experienced readers in consensus. Of the 56 meningiomas in the validation group 55 were detected by the deep learning model. In these patients the comparison of the deep learning model and manual segmentations revealed average dice coefficients of 0.91 ± 0.08 for contrast-enhancing tumor volume and 0.82 ± 0.12 for total lesion volume. In the training group, interreader variabilities of the 2 manual readers were 0.92 ± 0.07 for contrast-enhancing tumor and 0.88 ± 0.05 for total lesion volume. Deep learning-based automated segmentation yielded high segmentation accuracy, comparable to manual interreader variability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32060575
doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00884-4
pii: 10.1007/s00062-020-00884-4
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
357-366Références
DeAngelis LM. Brain tumors. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:114–23.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101113440207
Schob S, Frydrychowicz C, Gawlitza M, Bure L, Preuß M, Hoffmann KT, Surov A. Signal intensities in preoperative MRI do not reflect proliferative activity in meningioma. Transl Oncol. 2016;9:274–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.05.003
Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJ, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Niessen WJ, Breteler MM, van der Lugt A. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1821–8.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070972
Spasic M, Pelargos PE, Barnette N, Bhatt NS, Lee SJ, Ung N, Gopen Q, Yang I. Incidental meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2016;27:229–38.
doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2015.11.012
Yao A, Pain M, Balchandani P, Shrivastava RK. Can MRI predict meningioma consistency?: a correlation with tumor pathology and systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2018;41:745–53.
doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0801-0
pubmed: 27873040
Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M, Jenkinson MD, Sallabanda K, Houdart E, von Deimling A, Stavrinou P, Lefranc F, Lund-Johansen M, Moyal EC, Brandsma D, Henriksson R, Soffietti R, Weller M. EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:e383–91.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30321-7
Chang V, Narang J, Schultz L, Issawi A, Jain R, Rock J, Rosenblum M. Computer-aided volumetric analysis as a sensitive tool for the management of incidental meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154:589–97.
doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1273-9
Fountain DM, Soon WC, Matys T, Guilfoyle MR, Kirollos R, Santarius T. Volumetric growth rates of meningioma and its correlation with histological diagnosis and clinical outcome: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159:435–45.
doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-3071-2
Zeidman LA, Ankenbrandt WJ, Du H, Paleologos N, Vick NA. Growth rate of non-operated meningiomas. J Neurol. 2008;255:891–5.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0801-2
Xue Y, Chen S, Qin J, Liu Y, Huang B, Chen H. Application of deep learning in automated analysis of molecular images in cancer: a survey. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2017;2017:9512370.
doi: 10.1155/2017/9512370
Akkus Z, Galimzianova A, Hoogi A, Rubin DL, Erickson BJ. Deep learning for brain MRI segmentation: state of the art and future directions. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30:449–59.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4
pubmed: 28577131
pmcid: 5537095
Mazzara GP, Velthuizen RP, Pearlman JL, Greenberg HM, Wagner H. Brain tumor target volume determination for radiation treatment planning through automated MRI segmentation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:300–12.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.026
Lotan E, Jain R, Razavian N, Fatterpekar GM, Lui YW. State of the art: machine learning applications in glioma imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212:26–37.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20218
pubmed: 30332296
Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K, Kirby J, Burren Y, Porz N, Slotboom J, Wiest R, Lanczi L, Gerstner E, Weber MA, Arbel T, Avants BB, Ayache N, Buendia P, Collins DL, Cordier N, Corso JJ, Criminisi A, Das T, Delingette H, Demiralp Ç, Durst CR, Dojat M, Doyle S, Festa J, Forbes F, Geremia E, Glocker B, Golland P, Guo X, Hamamci A, Iftekharuddin KM, Jena R, John NM, Konukoglu E, Lashkari D, Mariz JA, Meier R, Pereira S, Precup D, Price SJ, Raviv TR, Reza SM, Ryan M, Sarikaya D, Schwartz L, Shin HC, Shotton J, Silva CA, Sousa N, Subbanna NK, Szekely G, Taylor TJ, Thomas OM, Tustison NJ, Unal G, Vasseur F, Wintermark M, Ye DH, Zhao L, Zhao B, Zikic D, Prastawa M, Reyes M, Van Leemput K. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34:1993–2024.
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694
Baessler B, Mannil M, Oebel S, Maintz D, Alkadhi H, Manka R. Subacute and chronic left ventricular myocardial scar: accuracy of texture analysis on nonenhanced cine MR images. Radiology. 2018;286:103–12.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170213
Kamnitsas K, Ledig C, Newcombe VFJ, Simpson JP, Kane AD, Menon DK, Rueckert D, Glocker B. Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation. Med Image Anal. 2016;36:61–78.
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004
Laukamp KR, Thiele F, Shakirin G, Zopfs D, Faymonville A, Timmer M, Maintz D, Perkuhn M, Borggrefe J. Fully automated detection and segmentation of meningiomas using deep learning on routine multiparametric MRI. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:124–32.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5595-8
pubmed: 29943184
Perkuhn M, Stavrinou P, Thiele F, Shakirin G, Mohan M, Garmpis D, Kabbasch C, Borggrefe J. Clinical evaluation of a multiparametric deep learning model for glioblastoma segmentation using heterogeneous magnetic resonance imaging data from clinical routine. Invest Radiol. 2018;53:647–54.
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000484
Kickingereder P, Isensee F, Tursunova I, Petersen J, Neuberger U, Bonekamp D, Brugnara G, Schell M, Kessler T, Foltyn M, Harting I, Sahm F, Prager M, Nowosielski M, Wick A, Nolden M, Radbruch A, Debus J, Schlemmer HP, Heiland S, Platten M, von Deimling A, van den Bent MJ, Gorlia T, Wick W, Bendszus M, Maier-Hein KH. Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:728–40.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30098-1
Kooi T, Litjens G, van Ginneken B, Gubern-Mérida A, Sánchez CI, Mann R, den Heeten A, Karssemeijer N. Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med Image Anal. 2017;35:303–12.
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436–44.
doi: 10.1038/nature14539
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW. The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–20.
doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
Lindemann F, Laukamp KR, Jacobs A, Hinrichs KH. Interactive comparative visualization of multimodal brain tumor segmentation data. Vision, modeling, and visualization. 2013. pp. 105–12.
GitHub. DeepMedic. 2019. https://github.com/deepmedic . Accessed 21 Nov 2019.
Crum WR, Camara O, Hill DLG. Generalized overlap measures for evaluation and validation in medical image analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25:1451–61.
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2006.880587
Havaei M, Davy A, Warde-Farley D, Biard A, Courville A, Bengio Y, Pal C, Jodoin PM, Larochelle H. Brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks. Med Image Anal. 2017;35:18–31.
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004
Hoseini F, Shahbahrami A, Bayat P. An efficient implementation of deep convolutional neural networks for MRI segmentation. J Digit Imaging. 2018;31:738–47.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-018-0062-2
Shimol EB, Joskowicz L, Eliahou R, Shoshan Y. Computer-based radiological longitudinal evaluation of meningiomas following stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13:215–28.
doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1673-7
Laukamp KR, Lindemann F, Weckesser M, Hesselmann V, Ligges S, Wölfer J, Jeibmann A, Zinnhardt B, Viel T, Schäfers M, Paulus W, Stummer W, Schober O, Jacobs AH. Multimodal imaging of patients with gliomas confirms (11)C-MET PET as a complementary marker to MRI for noninvasive tumor grading and intraindividual follow-up after therapy. Mol Imaging. 2017;16:1536012116687651.
doi: 10.1177/1536012116687651
Sauwen N, Acou M, Bharath HN, Sima DM, Veraart J, Maes F, Himmelreich U, Achten E, Van Huffel S. The successive projection algorithm as an initialization method for brain tumor segmentation using non-negative matrix factorization. PLoS One. 2017;12:e180268.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180268
Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine JL, Duerk JL, Griswold MA. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature. 2013;495:187–92.
doi: 10.1038/nature11971
Badve C, Yu A, Dastmalchian S, Rogers M, Ma D, Jiang Y, Margevicius S, Pahwa S, Lu Z, Schluchter M, Sunshine J, Griswold M, Sloan A, Gulani V. MR fingerprinting of adult brain tumors: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:492–9.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5035
Laukamp KR, Shakirin G, Baeßler B, Thiele F, Zopfs D, Hokamp NG, Timmer M, Kabbasch C, Perkuhn M, Borggrefe J. Accuracy of radiomics-based feature analysis on multiparametric MR images for non-invasive meningioma grading. World Neurosurg. 2019;132:e366–90.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.148
Latini F, Larsson EM, Ryttlefors M. Rapid and accurate MRI segmentation of peritumoral brain edema in meningiomas. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017;27:145–52.
doi: 10.1007/s00062-015-0481-0
Otero-Rodriguez A, Tabernero MD, Munoz-Martin MC, Sousa P, Orfao A, Pascual-Argente D, Gonzalez-Tablas M, Ruiz-Martin L. Re-evaluating Simpson grade I, II, and III resections in neurosurgical treatment of world health organization grade I meningiomas. World Neurosurg. 2016;96:483–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.007