Evaluation of Glycaemic Control, Glucose Variability and Hypoglycaemia on Long-Term Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion vs. Multiple Daily Injections: Observational Study in Pregnancies With Pre-Existing Type 1 Diabetes.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
Glucose variability
Pregnancy
Type 1 diabetes
Journal
Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders
ISSN: 1869-6953
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101539025
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
29
12
2019
pubmed:
16
2
2020
medline:
16
2
2020
entrez:
16
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We evaluated the effectiveness of long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) compared with multiple daily insulin (MDI) injections for glycaemic control and variability, hypoglycaemic episodes and maternal/neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with pre-existing type 1 diabetes (pT1D). Our observational cohort study included 128 consecutive pregnant women with pT1D, who were treated from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2017. Of 128 participants, 48 were on CSII and 80 were on MDI. Glycaemic control was determined by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (captured in preconception and each trimester of pregnancy). Glucose variability (GV) was expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) [calculated from self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values], and hypoglycaemia was defined as glucose values < 3.9 mmol/l. The data on maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected from obstetrical records. Duration of the treatment was 8.8 ± 5.3 years in the CSII and 12.6 ± 8.0 years in the MDI group. The CSII lowered HbA1c in preconception (7.1 ± 0.1 vs. 7.9 ± 0.2%, p = 0.03) and the first (6.9 ± 0.1 vs. 7.7 ± 0.2%, p = 0.02), second (6.6 ± 0.1 vs. 7.2 ± 0.1%, p = 0.003) and third (6.5 ± 0.1 vs. 6.8 ± 0.1%, p = 0.02) trimesters significantly better than MDI. Significantly lower CV was observed only for fasting glycaemia in the first trimester (17.1 vs 28.4%, p < 0.001) in favour of CSII. Moreover, the CSII group had significantly lower mean hypoglycaemic episodes/week/patient only during the first trimester (2.0 ± 1.7 vs 4.8 ± 1.5, p < 0.01). In early pregnancy, the majority of women on CSII had less hypoglycaemia than on MDI (0-3: 79.1 vs. 29.1%; 4-6: 18.8 vs. 65.8%; ≥ 7: 2.1 vs. 5.1%, p < 0.01, respectively). We found no difference in the incidence of adverse maternal/neonatal outcomes. Treatment with CSII resulted in a favourable reduction of HbA1c in the preconception period and each trimester in pregnancy. Moreover, long-term CSII treatment demonstrated more stable metabolic control with less GV of fasting glycaemia and fewer hypoglyacemic episodes only during early pregnancy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32060738
doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00780-7
pii: 10.1007/s13300-020-00780-7
pmc: PMC7136374
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
845-858Subventions
Organisme : Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
ID : Project 175097
Références
American Diabetes Association. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of medical care in diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Supplement 1):S165–72.
doi: 10.2337/dc19-S014
Jensen DM, Korsholm L, Ovesen P, Beck-Nielsen H, Moelsted Pedersen L, Westergaard JG, et al. Peri-conceptional A1C and risk of serious adverse pregnancy outcome in 933 women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(6):1046–8.
doi: 10.2337/dc08-2061
pmcid: 19265024
Lenhard MJ, Kinsley BT. Insulin therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;12:1270–5.
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.864631
Lapolla A, Dalfrà MG, Masin M, Bruttomesso D, Piva I, Crepaldi C, Tortul C, Dalla Barba B, Fedele D. Analysis of outcome of pregnancy in type 1 diabetics treated with insulin pump or conventional insulin therapy. Acta Diabetol. 2003;40:143–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00592-003-0103-1
pmcid: 14605971
Kallas-Koeman MM, Kong JM, Klinke JA, Butalia S, Lodha AK, Lim KI, Duan QM, Donovan LE. Insulin pump use in pregnancy is associated with lower HbA1c without increasing the rate of severe hypoglycaemia or diabetic ketoacidosis in women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2014;57(4):681–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3163-6
pmcid: 24434960
Rys PM, Ludwig-Slomczynska AH, Cyganek K, Maleck MT. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs multiple daily injections in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178:545–63.
doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0804
pmcid: 29545258
Dalfrà MG, Chilelli NC, Di Cianni G, Mello G, Lencioni C, Biagioni S, Scalese M, Sartore G, Lapolla A. Glucose fluctuations during gestation: an additional tool for monitoring pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Int J Endocrinol. 2013. Article ID 279021, 8 pages.
Dalfra MG, Sartore G, Cianni GD, et al. Glucose variability in diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(8):853–9.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0145
pmcid: 21751862
Hawkins JS. Glucose monitoring during pregnancy. Curr DiabRep. 2010;10:229–34.
doi: 10.1007/s11892-010-0111-9
Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1593–603.
doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028
pmcid: 31177185
Feig DF, Donovan LE, Corcoy R, Murphy KE, Amiel SA, Hunt KF, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2347–59.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32400-5
pmcid: 5713979
Soupal J, Petruzelkova L, Grunberger G, et al. Glycemic outcomes in adults with T1D are impacted more by continuous glucose monitoring than by insulin delivery method: 3 years of follow-up from the COMISAIR study. Diabetes Care. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-0888 . [Epub ahead of print].
Suhonen L, Hiilesmaa V, Teramo K. Glycaemic control during early pregnancy and fetal malformations in women with type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2000;43:79–82.
doi: 10.1007/s001250050010
Feldman AZ, Brown FM. Management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16:76.
doi: 10.1007/s11892-016-0765-z
pmcid: 4919374
Cyganek K, Hebda-Szydlo A, Katra B, et al. Glycemic control and selected pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes women on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections: the significance of pregnancy planning. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12:41–7.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0081
Chen R, Ben-Haroush A, Weismann-Brenner A, et al. Level of glycemic control and pregnancy outcome in type 1 diabetes: a comparison between multiple daily insulin injections and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:404.e1-e5.
Farrar D, Tuffnell DJ, West J: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD005542.
Nacionalni vodič za lekare u primarnoj zdravstvenoj zaštiti. Zdravstvena zaštita žena u toku trudnoće.Republička stručna komisija za izradu i implementaciju vodiča u kliničkoj praksi, Ministarstvo zdravlja Republike Srbije, Srpsko lekarsko društvo, 2005.
Luijf YM, van Bon AC, Hoekstra JB, Devries JH. Premeal injection of rapid-acting insulin reduces postprandial glycemic excursions in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2152–5.
doi: 10.2337/dc10-0692
pmcid: 2945151
Kekalainen P, Juuti M, Walle T, Laatikainen T. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion during pregnancy in women with complicated type 1 diabetes is associated with better glycemic control but not with improvement in pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(3):144–50.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0165
pmcid: 26502287
Bruttomesso D, Bonomo M, Costa S, et al. Type 1 diabetes control and pregnancy outcomes in women treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or with insulin glargine and multiple daily injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues (glargine-MDI). Diabetes Metab. 2011;37(5):426–31.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.02.002
pmcid: 21474360
Neff KJ, Forde R, Gavin C, et al. Pre-pregnancy care and pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection therapy. Ir J Med Sci. 2014;183:397–403.
doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-1027-6
pmcid: 24142539
Mello G, Biagioni S, Ottanelli S. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple daily injections (MDI) of rapid acting insulin analogues and detemir in type 1 diabetic (T1D) pregnant women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(3):276–80.
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.914922
pmcid: 24724804
Murphy HR, Elleri D, Allen JM, et al. Pathophysiology of postprandial hyperglycaemia in women with type 1 diabetes during pregnancy. Diabetologia. 2012;55:282–90.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2363-6
pmcid: 22080230
Abell SK, Suen M, Pease A, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and insulin requirements in women with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections: cohort study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19(5):280–7.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0412
pmcid: 28282241
Pickup JC, Sutton AJ. Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in type1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabet Med. 2008;25:765–74.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02486.x
pmcid: 18644063
Wender-Ozegowska E, Zawiejska A, Ozegowska K, et al. Multiple daily injections of insulin versus continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53:130–5.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.12027
pmcid: 23316799
Ringholm L, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Thorsteinsson B, Damm P, Mathiesen ER. Hypoglycaemia during pregnancy in women with Type 1 diabetes: hypoglycaemia during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2012;29:558–66.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03604.x
pmcid: 22313112
McGrath RT, Glastras SJ, Seeho SK, Scott ES, Fulcher GR, Hocking SL. Association between glycemic variability, HbA
doi: 10.2337/dc17-0626
pmcid: 28615243
Law GR, Ellison GT, Secher AL, et al. Analysis of continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with diabetes: distinct temporal patterns of glucose associated with large-for-gestationalage infants. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:1319–25.
doi: 10.2337/dc15-0070
pmcid: 25906785
Gupta R, Khoury J, Altaye M, Dolan L, Szczesniak RD. Glycemic excursions in type 1 diabetes in pregnancy: a semiparametric statistical approach to identify sensitive time points during estation. J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:2852913.
doi: 10.1155/2017/2852913
pmcid: 28280744
Polsky S, Garcetti R. CGM, pregnancy, and remote monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19(S3):S49–59.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0023
Yu Q, Aris IM, Tan KH, Li LJ. Application and utility of continuous glucose monitoring in pregnancy: a systematic review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:697.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00697
pmcid: 6798167