Belgian multicentre study on lumbar spine imaging: Radiation dose and cost analysis; Evaluation of compliance with recommendations for efficient use of medical imaging.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Belgium
Cost-Benefit Analysis
/ economics
Diagnostic Imaging
/ economics
Female
Guideline Adherence
/ economics
Health Care Costs
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae
/ diagnostic imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ economics
Male
Middle Aged
Radiation Dosage
Radiography
/ economics
Referral and Consultation
/ economics
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ economics
Young Adult
Costs
Diagnostic imaging
Radiation dosimetry
Referral
Spine
Journal
European journal of radiology
ISSN: 1872-7727
Titre abrégé: Eur J Radiol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8106411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
26
09
2019
revised:
28
01
2020
accepted:
31
01
2020
pubmed:
18
2
2020
medline:
4
11
2020
entrez:
17
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess compliance of lumbar spine imaging referrals with national imaging recommendations and to evaluate the impact of inappropriate imaging on the collective radiation dose and health insurance costs. In 2011 and 2015, 633 lumbar spine imaging referrals were evaluated across 9 Belgian hospitals. For each patient, a new clinical anamnesis and physical examination were performed. Together with the referral, this data were confronted with the national imaging recommendations. Collective radiation dose was estimated for the radiography and CT procedures. Cost analysis was based on national reimbursement fees. Statistical analysis was performed using multilevel linear and logistic regression models. The fraction of unjustified imaging referrals decreased from 50 % in 2011 to 41 % in 2015 (p = 0.255). The odds of a justified examination are 3.1 times higher when the referral is done by a specialist instead of a general practitioner. The highest percentage of unjustified examinations was found for CT (85 % in 2011, 81 % in 2015; p = 0.044). Seventy-five percent of the collective dose of both the 2011 and the 2015 study population was not justified. Adherence to the recommendations could result in an estimated 16 % and 5 % cost reduction for the 2011 and 2015 study samples, respectively. Between 2011 and 2015, no significant improvement was found in requesting justified lumbar spine imaging procedures, although a positive trend was observed for CT. A shift from CT to MRI is necessary to improve the appropriateness of lumbar spine imaging referrals and to reduce the collective radiation dose.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32062329
pii: S0720-048X(20)30053-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108864
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108864Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.