Psychological treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.


Journal

Psychological medicine
ISSN: 1469-8978
Titre abrégé: Psychol Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1254142

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 18 2 2020
medline: 9 3 2021
entrez: 18 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a potentially chronic and disabling disorder affecting a significant minority of people exposed to trauma. Various psychological treatments have been shown to be effective, but their relative effects are not well established. We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analyses of psychological interventions for adults with PTSD. Outcomes included PTSD symptom change scores post-treatment and at 1-4-month follow-up, and remission post-treatment. We included 90 trials, 6560 individuals and 22 interventions. Evidence was of moderate-to-low quality. Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) [standardised mean difference (SMD) -2.07; 95% credible interval (CrI) -2.70 to -1.44], combined somatic/cognitive therapies (SMD -1.69; 95% CrI -2.66 to -0.73), trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT) (SMD -1.46; 95% CrI -1.87 to -1.05) and self-help with support (SMD -1.46; 95% CrI -2.33 to -0.59) appeared to be most effective at reducing PTSD symptoms post-treatment v. waitlist, followed by non-TF-CBT, TF-CBT combined with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), SSRIs, self-help without support and counselling. EMDR and TF-CBT showed sustained effects at 1-4-month follow-up. EMDR, TF-CBT, self-help with support and counselling improved remission rates post-treatment. Results for other interventions were either inconclusive or based on limited evidence. EMDR and TF-CBT appear to be most effective at reducing symptoms and improving remission rates in adults with PTSD. They are also effective at sustaining symptom improvements beyond treatment endpoint. Further research needs to explore the long-term comparative effectiveness of psychological therapies for adults with PTSD and also the impact of severity and complexity of PTSD on treatment outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a potentially chronic and disabling disorder affecting a significant minority of people exposed to trauma. Various psychological treatments have been shown to be effective, but their relative effects are not well established.
METHODS
We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analyses of psychological interventions for adults with PTSD. Outcomes included PTSD symptom change scores post-treatment and at 1-4-month follow-up, and remission post-treatment.
RESULTS
We included 90 trials, 6560 individuals and 22 interventions. Evidence was of moderate-to-low quality. Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) [standardised mean difference (SMD) -2.07; 95% credible interval (CrI) -2.70 to -1.44], combined somatic/cognitive therapies (SMD -1.69; 95% CrI -2.66 to -0.73), trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT) (SMD -1.46; 95% CrI -1.87 to -1.05) and self-help with support (SMD -1.46; 95% CrI -2.33 to -0.59) appeared to be most effective at reducing PTSD symptoms post-treatment v. waitlist, followed by non-TF-CBT, TF-CBT combined with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), SSRIs, self-help without support and counselling. EMDR and TF-CBT showed sustained effects at 1-4-month follow-up. EMDR, TF-CBT, self-help with support and counselling improved remission rates post-treatment. Results for other interventions were either inconclusive or based on limited evidence.
CONCLUSIONS
EMDR and TF-CBT appear to be most effective at reducing symptoms and improving remission rates in adults with PTSD. They are also effective at sustaining symptom improvements beyond treatment endpoint. Further research needs to explore the long-term comparative effectiveness of psychological therapies for adults with PTSD and also the impact of severity and complexity of PTSD on treatment outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32063234
doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000070
pii: S0033291720000070
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

542-555

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M005615/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Auteurs

Ifigeneia Mavranezouli (I)

Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK.
National Guideline Alliance, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, LondonSE1 1SZ, UK.

Odette Megnin-Viggars (O)

Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK.
National Guideline Alliance, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, LondonSE1 1SZ, UK.

Caitlin Daly (C)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, BristolBS8 2PS, UK.

Sofia Dias (S)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, BristolBS8 2PS, UK.

Nicky J Welton (NJ)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, BristolBS8 2PS, UK.

Sarah Stockton (S)

National Guideline Alliance, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, LondonSE1 1SZ, UK.

Gita Bhutani (G)

Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Bamber Bridge, PrestonPR5 6AW, UK.
University of Liverpool, LiverpoolL69 3BX, UK.

Nick Grey (N)

Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Aldrington House, 35 New Church Road, Hove, BN3 4AG, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Sussex House, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK.

Jonathan Leach (J)

Davenal House Surgery, BromsgroveB61 0DD, UK.

Neil Greenberg (N)

King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe Road, LondonSE5 9RJ, UK.

Cornelius Katona (C)

Helen Bamber Foundation, Bruges Place, 15-20 Baynes Street, LondonNW1 0TF, UK.
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Wings A and B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, LondonW1T 7NF, UK.

Sharif El-Leithy (S)

Traumatic Stress Service, Springfield Hospital, LondonSW17 7DJ, UK.

Stephen Pilling (S)

Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, LondonWC1E 7HB, UK.
National Guideline Alliance, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 10-18 Union Street, LondonSE1 1SZ, UK.
Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, 4 St Pancras Way, LondonNW1 0PE, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH