From single-arm studies to externally controlled studies. Methodological considerations and guidelines.

Control group External control study Indirect comparison Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons Non-comparative Single-arm study

Journal

Therapie
ISSN: 1958-5578
Titre abrégé: Therapie
Pays: France
ID NLM: 0420544

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 14 11 2019
accepted: 22 11 2019
pubmed: 18 2 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
entrez: 18 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Single-arm studies are sometimes used as pivotal studies but they have methodological limitations which prevent them from obtaining the high level of reliability as for a randomised controlled study which remains the gold standard in the evaluation of new treatments. The objective of this roundtable was to discuss the limitations of these single-arm studies, to analyse available and acceptable solutions in order to propose guidelines for their conduct and assessment. Single-arm studies themselves are intrinsically inappropriate for demonstrating the benefit of a new treatment because it is impossible to infer the benefit from a value obtained under treatment without knowing what it would have been in the absence of the new treatment. The implication is that comparison with other data is necessary. However this comparison has limitations due to (1) the post hoc choice of the reference used for comparison, (2) the confusion bias for which an adjustment approach is imperative and, (3) the other biases, measure and attrition among others. When these limitations are taken into account this should, first and foremost, lead to the conduct of externally controlled trials instead of single-arm trials as is proposed by the latest version of ICH E10. Moreover, the external control must be formalised in the study protocol with a priori selection of both the reference control and the formal method of comparison: test in relation to a standard, adjustment on individual data, a synthetic control group or matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC). Lastly, externally controlled studies must be restricted to situations where randomisation is infeasible. To be acceptable, these studies must be able to guarantee freedom from residual confusion bias, which is only truly acceptable if the observed effect is dramatic and the usual course of the disease is highly predicable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32063399
pii: S0040-5957(19)30182-9
doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2019.11.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

21-27

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

Michel Cucherat (M)

Service de pharmacotoxicologie, hospices civils de Lyon, 16, avenue Lacassagne, 69003 Lyon, France; Laboratoire de biométrie et biologie évolutive, CNRS, UMR5558, université Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France. Electronic address: michel.cucherat@univ-lyon1.fr.

Silvy Laporte (S)

Unité de recherche clinique innovation pharmacologie, UMR 1059 Sainbiose, bâtiment recherche, CHU de Saint-Étienne, université Jean Monnet, hôpital Nord, 42022 Saint-Étienne, France.

Olivier Delaitre (O)

Boehringer Ingelheim France, 75013 Paris, France.

Jehan-Michel Behier (JM)

Celgene, 92066 Paris La Défense cedex, France.

Anne d'Andon (A)

CEMKA, 92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France.

Florence Binlich (F)

Servier, 92284 Suresnes, France.

Serge Bureau (S)

AP-HP, 75010 Paris, France.

Catherine Cornu (C)

Inserm, CIC1407, hospices civils de Lyon, 69000 Lyon, France; UMR 5558, université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Lyon, France.

Cécile Fouret (C)

Medtronic France, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Natalie Hoog Labouret (N)

Institut national du cancer, 92513 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Bruno Laviolle (B)

Inserm, CIC 1414, service de Pharmacologie, centre d'investigation clinique de Rennes, CHU Rennes, université Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France.

Houda Miadi-Fargier (H)

Bayer HealthCare, 59120 Loos, France.

Xavier Paoletti (X)

Équipe de biostatistiques pour la médecine de précision, Inserm U900, Institut Curie, université de Versailles Saint-Quentin, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France.

Matthieu Roustit (M)

Inserm, HP2, CHU de Grenoble Alpes, université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France.

Tabassome Simon (T)

Service de pharmacologie clinique, plateforme de recherche clinique de l'Est parisien (URCEST-CRCEST-CRBHUEP-SU), hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75012 Paris, France; Sorbonne université, université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie site Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France; French Alliance for CV Clinical Trials (FACT), réseau F-CRIN, INSERM U1148, 75877 Paris, France.

Nathalie Varoqueaux (N)

Astra Zeneca, 92400 Courbevoie, France.

Eric Vicaut (E)

Unité de recherche clinique, hôpital Fernand-Widal, AP-HP, 75010 Paris, France.

Jérémie Westerloppe (J)

Bristol-Myers Squibb, 92500 Rueil-Malmaison, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH