Similar factors underlie tree abundance in forests in native and alien ranges.
abundance
dissimilarity
forest
functional traits
global
plant invasion
trees
Journal
Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology
ISSN: 1466-822X
Titre abrégé: Glob Ecol Biogeogr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100895787
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
14
12
2018
revised:
25
09
2019
accepted:
08
10
2019
entrez:
18
2
2020
pubmed:
18
2
2020
medline:
18
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Alien plant species can cause severe ecological and economic problems, and therefore attract a lot of research interest in biogeography and related fields. To identify potential future invasive species, we need to better understand the mechanisms underlying the abundances of invasive tree species in their new ranges, and whether these mechanisms differ between their native and alien ranges. Here, we test two hypotheses: that greater relative abundance is promoted by (a) functional difference from locally co-occurring trees, and (b) higher values than locally co-occurring trees for traits linked to competitive ability. Global. Recent. Trees. We combined three global plant databases: sPlot vegetation-plot database, TRY plant trait database and Global Naturalized Alien Flora (GloNAF) database. We used a hierarchical Bayesian linear regression model to assess the factors associated with variation in local abundance, and how these relationships vary between native and alien ranges and depend on species' traits. In both ranges, species reach highest abundance if they are functionally similar to co-occurring species, yet are taller and have higher seed mass and wood density than co-occurring species. Our results suggest that light limitation leads to strong environmental and biotic filtering, and that it is advantageous to be taller and have denser wood. The striking similarities in abundance between native and alien ranges imply that information from tree species' native ranges can be used to predict in which habitats introduced species may become dominant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32063745
doi: 10.1111/geb.13027
pii: GEB13027
pmc: PMC7006795
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
281-294Subventions
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund FWF
ID : I 3757
Pays : Austria
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Global Ecology and Biogeography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Ecol Lett. 2007 Aug;10(8):701-9
pubmed: 17594425
Ecol Lett. 2011 Mar;14(3):274-81
pubmed: 21281419
Am J Bot. 2010 Oct;97(10):1587-94
pubmed: 21616793
Ecology. 2019 Jan;100(1):e02542
pubmed: 30341991
Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):167-71
pubmed: 26700811
Ecography (Cop.). 2013 Apr 1;36(5):560-568
pubmed: 24860240
Ecol Lett. 2018 Sep;21(9):1380-1389
pubmed: 29974602
Ecology. 2013 May;94(5):985-94
pubmed: 23858639
Behav Ecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;28(4):948-952
pubmed: 29622923
New Phytol. 2011 Jul;191(2):480-95
pubmed: 21477008
Ecol Lett. 2016 Mar;19(3):219-29
pubmed: 26689431
Ecol Lett. 2017 Dec;20(12):1526-1533
pubmed: 29027344
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 May;20(5):223-8
pubmed: 16701373
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 May;20(5):1527-37
pubmed: 24343918
Ecology. 2008 Jun;89(6):1541-53
pubmed: 18589519
Ecology. 2015 Mar;96(3):762-74
pubmed: 26236872
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0125801
pubmed: 26018575
Trends Plant Sci. 2014 Sep;19(9):547-9
pubmed: 24946989
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0197877
pubmed: 29791491
Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):204-7
pubmed: 26700807
New Phytol. 2009;182(3):565-88
pubmed: 19434804
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 20;112(3):797-802
pubmed: 25561561
New Phytol. 2007;176(2):256-73
pubmed: 17822399
Ecol Lett. 2015 Apr;18(4):336-46
pubmed: 25728390
Ecol Lett. 2010 Feb;13(2):235-45
pubmed: 20002494
Nature. 2015 Sep 3;525(7567):100-3
pubmed: 26287466
Science. 2000 Oct 20;290(5491):521-3
pubmed: 11039934
Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):947-58
pubmed: 20576028