Learning how to deliver bad and challenging news: Exploring the experience of trainee sonographers - A qualitative study.

Sonography breaking bad news feedback training

Journal

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)
ISSN: 1742-271X
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101244122

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 07 06 2019
accepted: 22 08 2019
entrez: 18 2 2020
pubmed: 18 2 2020
medline: 18 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Previous studies suggest there is a need to improve the delivery of bad and challenging news in obstetric ultrasound settings. However, no research has explored the experiences of trainee sonographers when learning how to deliver challenging news. Understanding this could identify gaps in current provision and inform future training interventions. To explore the experiences of trainee sonographers when learning how to deliver challenging news. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with trainee sonographers ( Learning how to deliver difficult news was a journey where trainees developed their confidence over time. Most learning occurred in clinical settings, but classroom teaching complemented this. Trainees appreciated the opportunity to observe clinical practice and to hear from patient representatives. However, quality of teaching varied between centres and trainees reported uncertainty regarding the specific language and behaviours they should use. They described building their own personal protocol for news delivery through the course of their training. An ultrasound-specific news delivery protocol which details the words and behaviours sonographers can employ could help reduce uncertainty in trainees. Trainees may also benefit from receiving structured feedback on their news delivery performance.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Previous studies suggest there is a need to improve the delivery of bad and challenging news in obstetric ultrasound settings. However, no research has explored the experiences of trainee sonographers when learning how to deliver challenging news. Understanding this could identify gaps in current provision and inform future training interventions.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To explore the experiences of trainee sonographers when learning how to deliver challenging news.
METHODS METHODS
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with trainee sonographers (
RESULTS RESULTS
Learning how to deliver difficult news was a journey where trainees developed their confidence over time. Most learning occurred in clinical settings, but classroom teaching complemented this. Trainees appreciated the opportunity to observe clinical practice and to hear from patient representatives. However, quality of teaching varied between centres and trainees reported uncertainty regarding the specific language and behaviours they should use. They described building their own personal protocol for news delivery through the course of their training.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
An ultrasound-specific news delivery protocol which details the words and behaviours sonographers can employ could help reduce uncertainty in trainees. Trainees may also benefit from receiving structured feedback on their news delivery performance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32063992
doi: 10.1177/1742271X19876087
pii: 10.1177_1742271X19876087
pmc: PMC6987495
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

30-37

Informations de copyright

© The British Medical Ultrasound Society 2019.

Références

Ultrasound. 2019 Feb;27(1):55-63
pubmed: 30774699
J Fam Nurs. 2018 May;24(2):271-293
pubmed: 29764281
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015 Jan;70(1):39-44
pubmed: 25616346
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Mar;15:69-76
pubmed: 29389504
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2010 Apr;1(2):67-72
pubmed: 21122599
Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1400-1412
pubmed: 29877913
PLoS Med. 2014 Jul 01;11(7):e1001670
pubmed: 24983970
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 May-Jun;49(3):228-34
pubmed: 15134676
Br J Med Psychol. 2001 Jun;74(Pt 2):255-72
pubmed: 11453176
Birth. 2007 Mar;34(1):80-8
pubmed: 17324182
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1997 Sep-Oct;26(5):559-66
pubmed: 9313186
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(2):176-82; discussion 183
pubmed: 18081599
Reprod Health. 2010 Jun 14;7:10
pubmed: 20546610
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Apr;93(4):367-73
pubmed: 24433283
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr;39(4):201-16
pubmed: 19190099
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 22;14:363
pubmed: 25336335
Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302-11
pubmed: 10964998
Women Birth. 2016 Dec;29(6):e99-e104
pubmed: 27156021

Auteurs

Liz Tomlin (L)

Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

Molly Parsons (M)

School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Prashanth V Kumar (PV)

School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Jane Arezina (J)

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Specialist Science Education Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Reema Harrison (R)

School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Judith Johnson (J)

Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Classifications MeSH