Pre-diagnosis Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and Time to Staging in Lung Cancer: The Case Western MetroHealth Experience.
lung cancer
metrohealth
multidisciplinary care
multidisciplinary tumor board
pd-mtb
pre-diagnosis tumor board
thoracic oncology
time to staging
time to therapy
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jan 2020
08 Jan 2020
Historique:
entrez:
18
2
2020
pubmed:
18
2
2020
medline:
18
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction National guidelines support the discussion of cancer patients by multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB). We researched whether early pre-diagnosis multidisciplinary tumor board discussions are associated with shorter times to staging in lung cancer. Methods We reviewed our institution's lung cancer and MTB registries to retrospectively study if an early discussion at pre-diagnostic MTB (pd-MTB) influenced the timeliness of diagnostic evaluation. Over 14 months, 161 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer were included. Fifty-five patients were presented at pd-MTB while 106 (controls) patients were not. The primary outcome was the difference in the time interval from suspicious imaging (Ix) to completion of staging (Sx). Outcomes were adjusted for key confounders with a multiple regression analysis. Results For stages I, II, and III lung cancer, where time to therapy matters, early discussion of patients with nodules suspicious for malignancy at pd-MTB was associated with no time delays when compared to patients who were not discussed in pd-MTB. The mean time intervals for imaging to staging (with standard deviations) are 65 days in controls (sd = 42.67) and 75 days (sd = 58.27) in tumor board cases (p=0.39). Adjusting for confounders with a multiple regression analysis among all stages revealed a similar lack of difference in time intervals to diagnosis, staging, and therapy. Conclusion Our stage I-III lung cancer cases (pd-MTB) completed staging in a timely manner, similar to controls (no pd-MTB). The severity of illness at presentation and the availability of diagnostic services and others likely influence the results. Our manuscript shares important numerical data on timelines during cancer diagnosis and treatment. Using this data, prospective registries examining the process workflow may help standardize cancer quality goals and maximize referrals from primary-care/specialty providers. The key findings in our study create a paradigm for future studies to create and achieve "door-to-balloon" time targets for lung cancer care (akin to cardiac care) across different styles of tumor boards.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32064177
doi: 10.7759/cureus.6595
pmc: PMC7003723
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e6595Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Thalanayar Muthukrishnan et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jan 16;105(2):113-21
pubmed: 23274388
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Jun 13;9:267-74
pubmed: 27358568
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jul;16(7):807-821
pubmed: 30006423
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Feb;13(2 Suppl):R25-9
pubmed: 26846532
Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e211S-e250S
pubmed: 23649440
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):228-243
pubmed: 28240562
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Jul;38(1):1-5
pubmed: 20206544
Chest. 2016 Apr;149(4):943-50
pubmed: 26356134
Thorac Surg Clin. 2013 May;23(2):123-8
pubmed: 23566964
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Feb;12(2):155-6; e157-68
pubmed: 26464497
Chest. 2014 Sep;146(3):659-669
pubmed: 24700172