Factors Associated with Failure of Reperfusion in Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Multicenter Analysis.
Endovascular treatment
Large-vessel occlusion
Mechanical thrombectomy
Registry study
Unsuccessful reperfusion
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
16
10
2019
accepted:
23
01
2020
pubmed:
19
2
2020
medline:
6
11
2021
entrez:
19
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In acute large vessel occlusions, endovascular therapy (EVT) achieves flow restoration in the majority of cases; however, EVT fails to achieve sufficient reperfusion in a substantial minority of patients. This study aimed to identify predictors of failed reperfusion. In this study 2211 patients from the German Stroke Registry who received EVT for anterior circulation stroke were retrospectively analyzed. Failure of reperfusion was defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grades 0/1/2a, and sufficient reperfusion as TICI 2b/3. In 1629 patients with complete datasets, associations between failure of reperfusion and baseline clinical data, comorbidities, location of occlusion, and procedural data were assessed with multiple logistic regression. Failure of reperfusion occurred in 371 patients (16.8%) and was associated with the following locations of occlusion: cervical internal carotid artery (ICA, adjusted odds ratio, OR 2.01, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.08-3.69), intracranial ICA without carotid T occlusion (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.05-2.98), and M2 segment (adjusted OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.21-2.84). Failed reperfusion was also associated with cervical ICA stenosis (>70% stenosis, adjusted OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.69-4.97), stroke of other determined etiology by TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in acute stroke treatment) criteria (e.g. nonatherosclerotic vasculopathies, adjusted OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.36-5.39), and treatment given outside the usual working hours (adjusted OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.86). Successful reperfusion was associated with higher Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS) on initial imaging (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92), treatment with the patient under general anesthesia (adjusted OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.96), and concomitant ICA stenting in patients with ICA stenosis (adjusted OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.11-0.38). Several factors are associated with failure of reperfusion, most notably occlusions of the proximal ICA and low ASPECTS on admission. Conversely, stent placement in the proximal ICA was associated with reperfusion success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32067055
doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00880-8
pii: 10.1007/s00062-020-00880-8
pmc: PMC7943507
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
197-205Investigateurs
Tobias Boeckh-Behrens
(T)
Silke Wunderlich
(S)
Arno Reich
(A)
Martin Wiesmann
(M)
Ulrike Ernemann
(U)
Till-Karsten Hauser
(TK)
Eberhard Siebert
(E)
Sarah Zweynert
(S)
Georg Bohner
(G)
Alexander Ludolph
(A)
Karl-Heinz Henn
(KH)
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
(W)
Marlis Wagner
(M)
Joachim Röther
(J)
Bernd Eckert
(B)
Jörg Berrouschot
(J)
Albrecht Bormann
(A)
Christian Gerloff
(C)
Elke Hattingen
(E)
Gabor Petzold
(G)
Sven Thonke
(S)
Christopher Bangard
(C)
Christoffer Kraemer
(C)
Martin Dichgans
(M)
Frank Wollenweber
(F)
Lars Kellert
(L)
Franziska Dorn
(F)
Moriz Herzberg
(M)
Marios Psychogios
(M)
Jan Liman
(J)
Martina Petersen
(M)
Florian Stögbauer
(F)
Peter Kraft
(P)
Mirko Pham
(M)
Michael Braun
(M)
Gerhard F Hamann
(GF)
Andreas Kastrup
(A)
Christian Roth
(C)
Klaus Gröschel
(K)
Timo Uphaus
(T)
Volker Limmroth
(V)
Références
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 1;75(4):470-477
pubmed: 29340574
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95
pubmed: 25882376
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 May;11(5):439-442
pubmed: 30472671
Int J Stroke. 2019 Jun;14(4):372-380
pubmed: 30346260
Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1):102-6
pubmed: 21106955
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30
pubmed: 25671798
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;87(2):138-43
pubmed: 26285585
Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41
pubmed: 7678184
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2036-40
pubmed: 24876081
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 11;10:206
pubmed: 30915023
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 May 10;19(1):69
pubmed: 31077134
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Oct;11(10):970-974
pubmed: 30842304
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jun;11(6):535-538
pubmed: 31152058
BMC Neurol. 2019 Apr 15;19(1):65
pubmed: 30987600
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1290-1299
pubmed: 29976365
Circulation. 2017 Dec 12;136(24):2311-2321
pubmed: 28943516
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):2070-2076
pubmed: 30337435
Stroke. 2019 Feb;50(2):428-433
pubmed: 30580729
J Stroke. 2017 May;19(2):131-142
pubmed: 28592777
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):11-20
pubmed: 25517348
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Jan;28(1):185-190
pubmed: 30343988
Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 13;9:1046
pubmed: 30619028
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18
pubmed: 25671797
Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 27;10:127
pubmed: 30873105
N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 12;339(20):1415-25
pubmed: 9811916
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Oct;39(10):1848-1853
pubmed: 30166434
J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2015 Feb;8(1):39-45
pubmed: 25825631
Stroke. 2019 Oct;50(10):2842-2850
pubmed: 31869287
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Apr;9(4):336-339
pubmed: 26992412
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):998-1008
pubmed: 30860055
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Jun;10(6):516-524
pubmed: 28963367
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306
pubmed: 25882510
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31
pubmed: 26898852
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2500-2506
pubmed: 31337298
Stroke. 2018 Jun;49(6):1419-1425
pubmed: 29712881