Analysis of Kansas Water Well Policies and Proposal of Nonpublic Household Water Well Recommendations.


Journal

Environmental health perspectives
ISSN: 1552-9924
Titre abrégé: Environ Health Perspect
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0330411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
entrez: 19 2 2020
pubmed: 19 2 2020
medline: 22 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Many nonpublic water well users unknowingly consume contaminated groundwater containing unsafe levels of pollutants. This has important implications for more than 13 million households in the United States that rely upon nonpublic water wells for drinking, cooking, and other household uses. Although public water quality is regulated through the Safe Drinking Water Act, there are no drinking water standards for nonpublic water well quality in Kansas, nor is there an adequate public health infrastructure in place to prevent or address potential exposures to contamination. This project was conducted to identify promising action steps that would protect Kansans relying on nonpublic water wells for drinking, cooking, and other household purposes. The project team consisted of public health, environmental health, and legal professionals with experience working on groundwater quality issues impacting nonpublic water wells in Kansas. From 2015 through 2018, the team established and convened an advisory group; reviewed relevant state statutes and regulations, all Kansas county environmental codes, and a representative sample of 23 city water well codes; conducted an extensive review of academic literature to identify best practices; conducted dozens of key informant interviews; proposed recommendations; engaged dozens of stakeholders through a survey of these proposed recommendations; and conducted interactive webinars to identify which organizations need to lead each of the recommendations. The project team developed 18 recommendations. The recommendations are organized by survey respondents' perceptions of potential public health impact. There are very few standard practices in Kansas that ensure safe water for nonpublic household water wells. Although not all of the 18 recommendations may be applicable to other communities and states, many likely would be useful for governmental agencies, academic institutions, nonprofit organizations, and others to consider. These recommendations offer more protections for nonpublic household water well users than any resource we have found. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5507.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Many nonpublic water well users unknowingly consume contaminated groundwater containing unsafe levels of pollutants. This has important implications for more than 13 million households in the United States that rely upon nonpublic water wells for drinking, cooking, and other household uses. Although public water quality is regulated through the Safe Drinking Water Act, there are no drinking water standards for nonpublic water well quality in Kansas, nor is there an adequate public health infrastructure in place to prevent or address potential exposures to contamination.
OBJECTIVES
This project was conducted to identify promising action steps that would protect Kansans relying on nonpublic water wells for drinking, cooking, and other household purposes.
METHODS
The project team consisted of public health, environmental health, and legal professionals with experience working on groundwater quality issues impacting nonpublic water wells in Kansas. From 2015 through 2018, the team established and convened an advisory group; reviewed relevant state statutes and regulations, all Kansas county environmental codes, and a representative sample of 23 city water well codes; conducted an extensive review of academic literature to identify best practices; conducted dozens of key informant interviews; proposed recommendations; engaged dozens of stakeholders through a survey of these proposed recommendations; and conducted interactive webinars to identify which organizations need to lead each of the recommendations.
DISCUSSION
The project team developed 18 recommendations. The recommendations are organized by survey respondents' perceptions of potential public health impact. There are very few standard practices in Kansas that ensure safe water for nonpublic household water wells. Although not all of the 18 recommendations may be applicable to other communities and states, many likely would be useful for governmental agencies, academic institutions, nonprofit organizations, and others to consider. These recommendations offer more protections for nonpublic household water well users than any resource we have found. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5507.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32068469
doi: 10.1289/EHP5507
pmc: PMC7064324
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

25001

Références

Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Aug 03;125(8):085002
pubmed: 28893720
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2004 Oct 22-Nov 26;67(20-22):1679-704
pubmed: 15371209
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 1;505:1274-81
pubmed: 24875279
J Water Health. 2014 Sep;12(3):372-92
pubmed: 25252340
Minn Med. 2005 May;88(5):46-8
pubmed: 16022407
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 15;562:999-1009
pubmed: 27118151
Sci Total Environ. 2017 May 15;586:559-565
pubmed: 28215805
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Feb 15;544:601-5
pubmed: 26674689
J Environ Manage. 2011 Apr;92(4):1104-14
pubmed: 21185114
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 07;125(7):076001
pubmed: 28728142
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jun 1;554-555:113-8
pubmed: 26950625

Auteurs

Elizabeth Ablah (E)

Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, USA.

Mary Winston Marrow (MW)

Public Health Law Center, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Jack Brown (J)

Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, USA.

Allison Honn (A)

Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH