Dynamics of Classical Swine Fever Spread in Wild Boar in 2018-2019, Japan.
Japan
classical swine fever
space–time analysis
wild boar
Journal
Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2076-0817
Titre abrégé: Pathogens
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596317
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Feb 2020
13 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
22
01
2020
revised:
10
02
2020
accepted:
11
02
2020
entrez:
20
2
2020
pubmed:
20
2
2020
medline:
20
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prolongation of the classic swine fever (CSF) outbreak in Japan in 2018 was highly associated with the persistence and widespread of the CSF virus (CSFV) in the wild boar population. To investigate the dynamics of the CSF outbreak in wild boar, spatiotemporal analyses were performed. The positive rate of CSFV in wild boar fluctuated dramatically from March to June 2019, but finally stabilized at approximately 10%. The Euclidean distance from the initial CSF notified farm to the farthest infected wild boar of the day constantly increased over time since the initial outbreak except in the cases reported from Gunma and Saitama prefectures. The two-month-period prevalence, estimated using integrated nested Laplace approximation, reached >80% in half of the infected areas in March-April 2019. The area affected continued to expand despite the period prevalence decreasing up to October 2019. A large difference in the shapes of standard deviational ellipses and in the location of their centroids when including or excluding cases in Gunma and Saitama prefectures indicates that infections there were unlikely to have been caused simply by wild boar activities, and anthropogenic factors were likely involved. The emergence of concurrent space-time clusters in these areas after July 2019 indicated that CSF outbreaks were scattered by this point in time. The results of this epidemiological analysis help explain the dynamics of the spread of CSF and will aid in the implementation of control measures, including bait vaccination.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32069897
pii: pathogens9020119
doi: 10.3390/pathogens9020119
pmc: PMC7169391
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Vet Microbiol. 2000 Nov 15;77(1-2):29-41
pubmed: 11042398
Epidemiol Infect. 2005 Jun;133(3):559-68
pubmed: 15962563
Pathogens. 2019 Oct 24;8(4):
pubmed: 31653072
Front Microbiol. 2015 Oct 23;6:1141
pubmed: 26557109
Vet Microbiol. 2000 Apr 13;73(2-3):239-52
pubmed: 10785331
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Apr;64(2):656-662
pubmed: 26392004
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Feb;175:104873
pubmed: 31896501
Epidemiol Infect. 1992 Apr;108(2):377-86
pubmed: 1582476
Virus Genes. 2017 Jun;53(3):418-425
pubmed: 28260187
Arch Virol. 1994;136(3-4):309-23
pubmed: 8031236
Rev Sci Tech. 2002 Aug;21(2):287-303
pubmed: 11974616
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Dec;64(6):1848-1857
pubmed: 27658930
Front Microbiol. 2015 Nov 06;6:1211
pubmed: 26594202
Am J Vet Res. 1970 Oct;31(10):1787-94
pubmed: 4319263
BMC Vet Res. 2019 May 22;15(1):160
pubmed: 31118049
Vet Microbiol. 2000 Apr 13;73(2-3):103-19
pubmed: 10785321
J Vet Med Sci. 2019 Sep 3;81(9):1277-1284
pubmed: 31292349
PLoS Med. 2005 Mar;2(3):e59
pubmed: 15719066
Vet Microbiol. 2010 Apr 21;142(1-2):99-107
pubmed: 19854007