Prediction of degree of carotid stenosis with the transluminal attenuation difference ratio.
Aged
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
/ adverse effects
Carotid Artery, Internal
/ pathology
Carotid Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Case-Control Studies
Computed Tomography Angiography
/ methods
Female
Humans
Ischemic Attack, Transient
/ epidemiology
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Predictive Value of Tests
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex
/ methods
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
2
2020
medline:
3
3
2021
entrez:
20
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation difference (TAD) in predicting the severity of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The study cohort consisted of 48 patients with <50% stenosis, 50%-69% stenosis, 70%-99% stenosis, and 51 controls without plaque development in ICA. A total of 143 measurements were performed through right and left internal and common carotid arteries. The TAD ratio was calculated as the difference between the mean attenuation values of the common carotid artery (CCA) and ICA, divided by the MAV of the CCA, multiplied by 100. TAD ratio was significantly higher in severe (>70%) stenosis compared with control arteries and low-moderate stenosis. A TAD ratio cutoff of 4.5 predicted 70%-99% stenosis with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 93%. The inter- and intraobserver agreements in TAD measurements were almost perfect (ICC, 0.89-0.86). Assessment of TAD ratio predicts the degree of stenosis in concordance with NASCET system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32071030
doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.19259
pmc: PMC7239356
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
249-254Références
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Mar;3(2):179-86
pubmed: 20044512
Neurotherapeutics. 2011 Jul;8(3):319-29
pubmed: 21691873
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 26;61(12):1271-9
pubmed: 23414792
Am J Surg. 1985 May;149(5):651-5
pubmed: 3993849
Radiology. 2016 Apr;279(1):75-83
pubmed: 26444662
Eur Radiol. 2009 Dec;19(12):2809-18
pubmed: 19618190
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Nov;4(11):1149-57
pubmed: 22093264
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603
pubmed: 28122885
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul;27(6):795-804
pubmed: 20972834
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Oct;76(1):42-7
pubmed: 19464837
Neurosurgery. 2011 Oct;69(4):767-73; discussion 773
pubmed: 21508878
Circulation. 1962 May;25:849-53
pubmed: 13885620
N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 15;325(7):445-53
pubmed: 1852179
Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Jan;36(1):51-58
pubmed: 29110130
Int J Angiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):179-84
pubmed: 26417185
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
pubmed: 7063747
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;26(3):338-43
pubmed: 22285345
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Sep;35(9):1436-42
pubmed: 19560253
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(11):1088-96
pubmed: 23153908