Does the magnetization transfer effect bias chemical exchange saturation transfer effects? Quantifying chemical exchange saturation transfer in the presence of magnetization transfer.
CEST
MT
NOE
amide
qMT
quantitative
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
04
09
2019
revised:
16
01
2020
accepted:
20
01
2020
pubmed:
20
2
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
20
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is an MRI technique sensitive to the presence of low-concentration solute protons exchanging with water. However, magnetization transfer (MT) effects also arise when large semisolid molecules interact with water, which biases CEST parameter estimates if quantitative models do not account for macromolecular effects. This study establishes under what conditions this bias is significant and demonstrates how using an appropriate model provides more accurate quantitative CEST measurements. CEST and MT data were acquired in phantoms containing bovine serum albumin and agarose. Several quantitative CEST and MT models were used with the phantom data to demonstrate how underfitting can influence estimates of the CEST effect. CEST and MT data were acquired in healthy volunteers, and a two-pool model was fit in vivo and in vitro, whereas removing increasing amounts of CEST data to show biases in the CEST analysis also corrupts MT parameter estimates. When all significant CEST/MT effects were included, the derived parameter estimates for each CEST/MT pool significantly correlated (P < .05) with bovine serum albumin/agarose concentration; minimal or negative correlations were found with underfitted data. Additionally, a bootstrap analysis demonstrated that significant biases occur in MT parameter estimates (P < .001) when unmodeled CEST data are included in the analysis. These results indicate that current practices of simultaneously fitting both CEST and MT effects in model-based analyses can lead to significant bias in all parameter estimates unless a sufficiently detailed model is utilized. Therefore, care must be taken when quantifying CEST and MT effects in vivo by properly modeling data to minimize these biases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32072677
doi: 10.1002/mrm.28212
pmc: PMC7317383
doi:
Substances chimiques
Protons
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1359-1375Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 203139/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C5255/A18085
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
Magn Reson Med. 1999 Dec;42(6):1128-36
pubmed: 10571935
Magn Reson Med. 2014 May;71(5):1841-53
pubmed: 23801344
NMR Biomed. 2015 May;28(5):529-37
pubmed: 25788155
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Nov 12;20(12):1661-1671
pubmed: 29733378
Magn Reson Med. 1993 Jun;29(6):759-66
pubmed: 8350718
NMR Biomed. 2015 Feb;28(2):217-30
pubmed: 25504828
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jan;77(1):196-208
pubmed: 26845067
J Neuroimaging. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):1007-14
pubmed: 25702714
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jul 14;16:58-65
pubmed: 28761809
NMR Biomed. 2015 Feb;28(2):200-9
pubmed: 25483870
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Aug;80(2):767-779
pubmed: 29243295
Mult Scler. 2019 Oct;25(12):1580-1592
pubmed: 30230400
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Apr;67(4):979-90
pubmed: 21858864
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jan;61(1):22-7
pubmed: 19097204
Magn Reson Med. 2002 May;47(5):929-39
pubmed: 11979572
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Nov;82(5):1684-1699
pubmed: 31228291
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;23:101833
pubmed: 31063943
Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 1;64:640-9
pubmed: 22940589
Magn Reson Med. 1995 Apr;33(4):475-82
pubmed: 7776877
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 6;8(1):2475
pubmed: 29410469
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:180-188
pubmed: 25727379
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2016 Jan-Feb;11(1):4-14
pubmed: 26153196
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Oct;58(4):786-93
pubmed: 17899597
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Feb;77(2):730-739
pubmed: 26900759
J Neuroimaging. 2018 Jul;28(4):380-388
pubmed: 29676026
Nat Med. 2003 Aug;9(8):1085-90
pubmed: 12872167
NMR Biomed. 2016 Nov;29(11):1624-1633
pubmed: 27686882
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jan;20(1):45-57
pubmed: 11293691
NMR Biomed. 2018 Apr;31(4):e3879
pubmed: 29372571
NMR Biomed. 2015 Nov;28(11):1402-12
pubmed: 26374674
Neuroimage. 2018 Mar;168:222-241
pubmed: 28435103
Neuroradiology. 2017 Dec;59(12):1251-1263
pubmed: 28986653
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jun;65(6):1620-9
pubmed: 21337418
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jan;75(1):88-96
pubmed: 26445350
NMR Biomed. 2014 Sep;27(9):1019-29
pubmed: 24913989
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Aug;70(2):556-67
pubmed: 23008121
Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;79(7):1343-1352
pubmed: 30679178
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Oct;80(4):1568-1576
pubmed: 29405374
Neuroimage. 2004 Sep;23(1):409-24
pubmed: 15325389
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jan;75(1):137-49
pubmed: 25753614
Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56
pubmed: 11516708
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Nov;66(5):1346-52
pubmed: 21608030
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
pubmed: 12391568
J Magn Reson. 2000 Jul;145(1):24-36
pubmed: 10873494
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Feb;57(2):437-41
pubmed: 17260381
Neurology. 2014 Oct 21;83(17):1545-53
pubmed: 25253751
J Neurooncol. 2018 Aug;139(1):97-106
pubmed: 29594656
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
Magn Reson Med. 2004 May;51(5):945-52
pubmed: 15122676
NMR Biomed. 2011 Jun;24(5):492-8
pubmed: 20960580
J Magn Reson. 2012 Sep;222:88-95
pubmed: 22858666
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 15;95:106-16
pubmed: 24632465
NMR Biomed. 2014 Sep;27(9):1070-84
pubmed: 25066274
Appl Magn Reson. 2012 Apr;42(3):393-402
pubmed: 23243339
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):210-20
pubmed: 25208343
Neuroimage. 2009 Apr 15;45(3):795-809
pubmed: 19162204
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
pubmed: 12377157
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Feb;79(2):806-814
pubmed: 28474409
Brain. 2015 Jan;138(Pt 1):36-42
pubmed: 25564491
J Magn Reson. 2011 Aug;211(2):149-55
pubmed: 21641247
Neurotherapeutics. 2007 Jul;4(3):460-84
pubmed: 17599712
Neuroimage. 2009 Mar;45(1 Suppl):S173-86
pubmed: 19059349
J Magn Reson B. 1995 Aug;108(2):103-13
pubmed: 7648009
NMR Biomed. 2014 Mar;27(3):240-52
pubmed: 24395553
Magn Reson Med. 2008 May;59(5):1175-82
pubmed: 18429031
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Sep;82(3):924-934
pubmed: 31038244
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Apr;65(4):927-48
pubmed: 21337419
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Sep;84(3):1359-1375
pubmed: 32072677
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Jul;68(1):166-78
pubmed: 22190042