Who Could Not Avoid Exposure to High Levels of Residence-Based Pollution by Daily Mobility? Evidence of Air Pollution Exposure from the Perspective of the Neighborhood Effect Averaging Problem (NEAP).
Beijing
air pollution exposure
environmental justice
neighborhood effect averaging problem (NEAP)
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 02 2020
14 02 2020
Historique:
received:
21
11
2019
revised:
10
02
2020
accepted:
12
02
2020
entrez:
21
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
22
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It has been widely acknowledged that air pollution has a considerable adverse impact on people's health. Disadvantaged groups such as low-income people are often found to experience greater negative effects of environmental pollution. Thus, improving the accuracy of air pollution exposure assessment might be essential to policy-making. Recently, the neighborhood effect averaging problem (NEAP) has been identified as a specific form of possible bias when assessing individual exposure to air pollution and its health impacts. In this paper, we assessed the real-time air pollution exposure and residential-based exposure of 106 participants in a high-pollution community in Beijing, China. The study found that: (1) there are significant differences between the two assessments; (2) most participants experienced the NEAP and could lower their exposure by their daily mobility; (3) three vulnerable groups with low daily mobility and could not avoid the high pollution in their residential neighborhoods were identified as exceptions to this: low-income people who have low levels of daily mobility and limited travel outside their residential neighborhoods, blue-collar workers who spend long hours at low-end workplaces, and elderly people who face many household constraints. Public policies thus need to focus on the hidden environmental injustice revealed by the NEAP in order to improve the well-being of these environmentally vulnerable groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32074958
pii: ijerph17041223
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041223
pmc: PMC7068569
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Air Pollutants
0
Particulate Matter
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
BMJ. 2015 Mar 24;350:h1295
pubmed: 25810496
Demography. 2006 May;43(2):383-99
pubmed: 16889134
Health Place. 2017 Jan;43:85-94
pubmed: 27914271
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Sep 9;32:158-164
pubmed: 31610407
Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Jan;115(1):92-106
pubmed: 7055134
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Jun;165(1-4):365-75
pubmed: 19434507
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 15;15(9):
pubmed: 30223592
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 22;15(10):
pubmed: 30360440
Epidemiology. 2005 May;16(3):396-405
pubmed: 15824557
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):42-8
pubmed: 20588325
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 30;16(1):
pubmed: 30598024
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;15(1):17-28
pubmed: 15138449
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 14;16(24):
pubmed: 31847317
Environ Health. 2019 Feb 14;18(1):13
pubmed: 30764837
Air Qual Atmos Health. 2012 Jun;5(2):203-216
pubmed: 22662023
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 10;14(10):
pubmed: 28994744
J Econ Perspect. 2019;33(1):185-208
pubmed: 30707005
Environ Res. 2010 May;110(4):363-71
pubmed: 20227069
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 May;9(5):1593-608
pubmed: 22754459
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006 Jun;56(6):709-42
pubmed: 16805397
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Aug;50(8):1390-406
pubmed: 11002601
Environ Health. 2019 Jul 8;18(1):58
pubmed: 31280723
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 20;15(3):
pubmed: 29558426
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 26;16(1):
pubmed: 30587821
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 27;15(9):
pubmed: 30150510