Suicide by pesticide poisoning in India: a review of pesticide regulations and their impact on suicide trends.
Endosulfan
India
Means restriction
Pesticides
Poisoning
Prevention
Suicide
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Feb 2020
19 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
22
09
2019
accepted:
10
02
2020
entrez:
21
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
17
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pesticide self-poisoning is a common means of suicide in India. Banning highly hazardous pesticides from agricultural use has been successful in reducing total suicide numbers in several South Asian countries without affecting agricultural output. Here, we describe national and state-level regulation of highly hazardous pesticides and explore how they might relate to suicide rates across India. Information on pesticide regulation was collated from agriculture departments of the central government and all 29 state governments (excluding union territories). National and state-level data on suicides from 1995 to 2015 were obtained from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). We used joinpoint analysis and negative binomial regression to investigate the trends in suicide rates nationally and in Kerala, in view of the robust measures Kerala has taken to restrict a number of HHPs, to identify any effect on suicides. As of October 2019, 318 pesticides were registered for use in India, of which 18 were extremely (Class Ia) or highly (Class Ib) hazardous according to World Health Organization toxicity criteria. Despite many highly hazardous pesticides still being available, several bans have been implemented during the period studied. In our quantitative analyses we focused on the permanent bans in Kerala in 2005 (of endosulfan) and 2011 (of 14 other pesticides); and nationally in 2011 (of endosulfan). NCRB data indicate that pesticides were used in 441,918 reported suicides in India from 1995 to 2015, 90.3% of which occurred in 11 of the 29 states. There was statistical evidence of lower than expected rates of pesticide suicides (rate ratio [RR] 0.52, 95% CI 0.49-0.54) and total suicides nationally by 2014 (0.90, 0.87-0.93) after the 2011 endosulfan ban. In Kerala, there was a lower than expected rate of pesticide suicides (0.45, 0.42-0.49), but no change to the already decreasing trend in total suicides (1.02, 1.00-1.05) after the 2011 ban of 14 pesticides. The 2005 ban on endosulfan showed a similar effect - lower than expected pesticide suicides (0.79, 0.64-0.99), but no change to the decreasing trend of total suicides (0.97, 0.93-1.02) in 2010. There was no evidence of a decline in agricultural outputs following the bans. Highly hazardous pesticides continue to be used in India and pesticide suicide remains a serious public health problem. However, some pesticide bans do appear to have impacted previous trends in the rates of both pesticide suicides and all suicides. Comprehensive national bans of highly hazardous pesticides could lead to a reduction in suicides across India, in addition to reduced occupational poisoning, with minimal effects on agricultural yield.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pesticide self-poisoning is a common means of suicide in India. Banning highly hazardous pesticides from agricultural use has been successful in reducing total suicide numbers in several South Asian countries without affecting agricultural output. Here, we describe national and state-level regulation of highly hazardous pesticides and explore how they might relate to suicide rates across India.
METHODS
METHODS
Information on pesticide regulation was collated from agriculture departments of the central government and all 29 state governments (excluding union territories). National and state-level data on suicides from 1995 to 2015 were obtained from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). We used joinpoint analysis and negative binomial regression to investigate the trends in suicide rates nationally and in Kerala, in view of the robust measures Kerala has taken to restrict a number of HHPs, to identify any effect on suicides.
RESULTS
RESULTS
As of October 2019, 318 pesticides were registered for use in India, of which 18 were extremely (Class Ia) or highly (Class Ib) hazardous according to World Health Organization toxicity criteria. Despite many highly hazardous pesticides still being available, several bans have been implemented during the period studied. In our quantitative analyses we focused on the permanent bans in Kerala in 2005 (of endosulfan) and 2011 (of 14 other pesticides); and nationally in 2011 (of endosulfan). NCRB data indicate that pesticides were used in 441,918 reported suicides in India from 1995 to 2015, 90.3% of which occurred in 11 of the 29 states. There was statistical evidence of lower than expected rates of pesticide suicides (rate ratio [RR] 0.52, 95% CI 0.49-0.54) and total suicides nationally by 2014 (0.90, 0.87-0.93) after the 2011 endosulfan ban. In Kerala, there was a lower than expected rate of pesticide suicides (0.45, 0.42-0.49), but no change to the already decreasing trend in total suicides (1.02, 1.00-1.05) after the 2011 ban of 14 pesticides. The 2005 ban on endosulfan showed a similar effect - lower than expected pesticide suicides (0.79, 0.64-0.99), but no change to the decreasing trend of total suicides (0.97, 0.93-1.02) in 2010. There was no evidence of a decline in agricultural outputs following the bans.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Highly hazardous pesticides continue to be used in India and pesticide suicide remains a serious public health problem. However, some pesticide bans do appear to have impacted previous trends in the rates of both pesticide suicides and all suicides. Comprehensive national bans of highly hazardous pesticides could lead to a reduction in suicides across India, in addition to reduced occupational poisoning, with minimal effects on agricultural yield.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32075613
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8339-z
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-8339-z
pmc: PMC7031890
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pesticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
251Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M024075/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Open Philanthropy Project
ID : https://www.givewell.org/research/incubation-grants/centre-pesticide-suicide-prevention/august-2017-grant
Références
Indian J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;54(4):302-7
pubmed: 20882171
N Am J Med Sci. 2012 Mar;4(3):147-50
pubmed: 22454830
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:949076
pubmed: 24224181
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Oct;150(4):315-320
pubmed: 31823911
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 6;12(3):e0172893
pubmed: 28264041
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2001 Jan;20(1):15-8
pubmed: 11339619
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Aug 15;490:733-47
pubmed: 24907609
BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 02;12:260
pubmed: 22471759
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009 Jan;47(1):35-8
pubmed: 18608278
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;46(6):517-20
pubmed: 20372876
BMC Public Health. 2013 Sep 16;13:850
pubmed: 24041373
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019 Dec;49(6):1782-1783
pubmed: 30786045
Indian J Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;54(4):304-19
pubmed: 23372232
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;47(1):175-184
pubmed: 29024951
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;36(1):203-7
pubmed: 17301103
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):983-993
pubmed: 27255440
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(11):789-98
pubmed: 14758405
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Jun;10(6):581-8
pubmed: 15941422
BMC Public Health. 2007 Dec 21;7:357
pubmed: 18154668
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018 Aug;18(3):e299-e303
pubmed: 30607269
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;52(1):65-71
pubmed: 16463596
BMJ. 2013 Nov 21;347:f6975
pubmed: 24264769
Lancet. 2012 Jun 23;379(9834):2343-51
pubmed: 22726517
Lancet. 2012 Jun 23;379(9834):2393-9
pubmed: 22726520
Inj Prev. 2014 Apr;20(2):134-7
pubmed: 23736739
PLoS Med. 2010 Oct 26;7(10):e1000357
pubmed: 21048990
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Feb-Mar;46(4-5):495-504
pubmed: 9460829
Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;32(6):902-9
pubmed: 14681240
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):UC01-4
pubmed: 26557594
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2009 May;28(5):309-16
pubmed: 19755461
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jul;5(7):e651-e652
pubmed: 28619217
J Clin Forensic Med. 2003 Sep;10(3):145-52
pubmed: 15275009
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Oct;3(10):e478-e489
pubmed: 30219340
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;3(7):646-59
pubmed: 27289303
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;45(2):470-9
pubmed: 26582846
BMJ. 2003 May 24;326(7399):1121-2
pubmed: 12763983
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 10;13:331
pubmed: 23575389
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Oct;3(10):e459-e460
pubmed: 30219339
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;36(6):1235-42
pubmed: 17726039
Lancet. 2002 Nov 30;360(9347):1728-36
pubmed: 12480425
Food Nutr Bull. 2007 Jun;28(2 Suppl):S381-91
pubmed: 17658085
QJM. 2000 Nov;93(11):715-31
pubmed: 11077028
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1863-1872
pubmed: 28807536
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Dec;23(12):1401-1407
pubmed: 30282121
Am J Public Health. 1993 Nov;83(11):1559-62
pubmed: 8238678
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(3):283-6
pubmed: 16749546
J Affect Disord. 2017 Sep;219:93-104
pubmed: 28535450
Natl Med J India. 2017 May-Jun;30(3):155-158
pubmed: 28937004
Toxicology. 2003 Nov 5;192(2-3):249-61
pubmed: 14580791
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Feb;30(1):56-67
pubmed: 24362640
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Jul;14(7):761-5
pubmed: 19497080
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Apr;116(4):492-5
pubmed: 18414632
Indian J Med Res. 1991 Jun;94:232-5
pubmed: 1937606
Indian J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;49(2):81-4
pubmed: 20711387
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;53(3):269-278
pubmed: 29209745
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;6(8):659-666
pubmed: 31272912
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Dec;22(12):1551-1560
pubmed: 29064144
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Oct;5(10):e1026-e1037
pubmed: 28807587
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e89944
pubmed: 24587141
Lancet. 2008 Feb 16;371(9612):597-607
pubmed: 17706760
J Affect Disord. 2019 Oct 1;257:1-9
pubmed: 31299398
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;55(5):401-6
pubmed: 19617276
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Feb;20(2):188-93
pubmed: 25327763