BRCAness, SLFN11, and RB1 loss predict response to topoisomerase I inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancers.
Journal
Science translational medicine
ISSN: 1946-6242
Titre abrégé: Sci Transl Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101505086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 02 2020
19 02 2020
Historique:
received:
12
03
2019
revised:
17
10
2019
accepted:
16
01
2020
entrez:
21
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
24
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Topoisomerase I (TOP1) inhibitors trap TOP1 cleavage complexes resulting in DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) during replication, which are repaired by homologous recombination (HR). Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) could be eligible for TOP1 inhibitors given the considerable proportion of tumors with a defect in HR-mediated repair (BRCAness). The TOP1 inhibitor irinotecan was tested in 40 patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of TNBC. BRCAness was determined with a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay, and expression of Schlafen family member 11 (SLFN11) and retinoblastoma transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1) was evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry analyses. In addition, the combination of irinotecan and the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) inhibitor VE-822 was tested in SLFN11-negative PDXs, and two clinical non-camptothecin TOP1 inhibitors (LMP400 and LMP776) were tested. Thirty-eight percent of the TNBC models responded to irinotecan. BRCAness combined with high SLFN11 expression and RB1 loss identified highly sensitive tumors, consistent with the notion that deficiencies in cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair result in high sensitivity to TOP1 inhibitors. Treatment by the ATR inhibitor VE-822 increased sensitivity to irinotecan in SLFN11-negative PDXs and abolished irinotecan-induced phosphorylation of checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1). LMP400 (indotecan) and LMP776 (indimitecan) showed high antitumor activity in BRCA1-mutated or BRCAness-positive PDXs. Last, low SLFN11 expression was associated with poor survival in 250 patients with TNBC treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of TNBC respond to irinotecan. BRCAness, high SLFN11 expression, and RB1 loss are highly predictive of response to irinotecan and the clinical indenoisoquinoline TOP1 inhibitors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32075943
pii: 12/531/eaax2625
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax2625
pmc: PMC8662740
mid: NIHMS1731291
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nuclear Proteins
0
RB1 protein, human
0
Retinoblastoma Binding Proteins
0
SLFN11 protein, human
0
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors
0
Irinotecan
7673326042
Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
EC 2.3.2.27
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA BC006161
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
Références
Chem Biol. 2010 May 28;17(5):421-33
pubmed: 20534341
Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):603-7
pubmed: 22460905
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jun 1;24(11):2605-2615
pubmed: 29463559
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):14970-5
pubmed: 12397185
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(2):347-58
pubmed: 23512247
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 11;109(37):15030-5
pubmed: 22927417
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 1;21(5):1139-50
pubmed: 25733708
Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Sep;201:94-102
pubmed: 31128155
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 May 07;16(3):207
pubmed: 25223380
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 May 1;12(9):2657-61
pubmed: 16675556
Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Oct;20(20):7751-63
pubmed: 11003670
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(20):7501-5
pubmed: 2845409
Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Oct;6(10):789-802
pubmed: 16990856
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2849-55
pubmed: 15254052
Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):432-44
pubmed: 22152853
Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 1;72(21):5454-62
pubmed: 22933060
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 15;25(22):6581-6589
pubmed: 31227499
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0119614
pubmed: 25774912
Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2006;81:179-229
pubmed: 16891172
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Apr 15;24(8):1944-1953
pubmed: 29391350
J Clin Invest. 2007 Jan;117(1):218-28
pubmed: 17160137
Cell Cycle. 2010 Oct 15;9(20):4153-63
pubmed: 20948315
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Oct 15;25(20):6206-6216
pubmed: 31409613
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jul 1;13(13):3989-98
pubmed: 17606733
Adv Cancer Res. 2010;108:73-112
pubmed: 21034966
Cell Cycle. 2008 Apr 15;7(8):1095-103
pubmed: 18414045
J Pathol. 2017 Jun;242(2):165-177
pubmed: 28299801
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 1;24(23):5830-5840
pubmed: 30061364
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Oct 26;8(362):362ps17
pubmed: 27797957
Cancer Cell. 2017 Feb 13;31(2):286-299
pubmed: 28196596
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 21;380(8):741-751
pubmed: 30786188
Int J Cancer. 2019 Oct 1;145(7):1902-1912
pubmed: 30859564
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Mar 15;25(6):1838-1850
pubmed: 30504427
Mol Cell. 2018 Feb 1;69(3):371-384.e6
pubmed: 29395061
Genome Biol. 2009;10(11):R128
pubmed: 19903341
Int J Oncol. 2003 May;22(5):1169-73
pubmed: 12684687
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 15;16(24):6159-68
pubmed: 20802015
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Sep;177(2):335-343
pubmed: 31222709
EMBO Rep. 2016 Jan;17(1):94-109
pubmed: 26658330
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jul 1;110(7):704-713
pubmed: 29788099
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2141-2148
pubmed: 28291390
Mol Cancer Ther. 2018 Aug;17(8):1694-1704
pubmed: 29748210
Mol Pharmacol. 1988 Dec;34(6):755-60
pubmed: 2849043
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Jul;78(1):73-81
pubmed: 27169793
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016 Nov;17(11):703-721
pubmed: 27649880