An Evaluation of the Different Serum Markers Associated with Mortality in Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever.
Journal
Rambam Maimonides medical journal
ISSN: 2076-9172
Titre abrégé: Rambam Maimonides Med J
Pays: Israel
ID NLM: 101538065
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Oct 2020
14 Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
23
2
2020
entrez:
21
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a tick-borne viral disease with a high mortality rate. Although CCHF has been widely investigated over the past decade, a review of the literature indicated no data on the prognostic capacity of the mean platelet volume-to-platelet count ratio (MPVPCR) and the red cell distribution width-to-platelet count ratio (RDWPCR) for the systemic inflammatory response in patients with CCHF. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of MPVPCR and RDWPCR on mortality in patients with CCHF. A total of 807 patients that were admitted to the Cumhuriyet University Hospital's Emergency Department from January 2010 to December 2018 were involved. The RDWPCR and MPVPCR were separately calculated via absolute blood red cell and platelet counts at the time of admission. Before performing receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to define the optimum cut-off values of MPVPCR and RDWPCR stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictive factors related to mortality in CCHF patients. Values of both MPVPCR and RDWPCR were significantly lower in survivors than in non-survivors (MPVPCR: 0.20±0.23 versus 0.55±0.55, P<0.001; RDWPCR: 0.27±0.32 versus 0.77±0.77, P<0.001, respectively). The MPVPCR (odds ratio [OR], 5.95; P=0.048) was an independent predictor for the prognosis of mortality in CCHF patients. The area under the curve in the ROC curve analysis for MPVPCR was 0.876 with a cut-off of 0.21 (sensitivity 87%, specificity 76%). At the time of admission, MPVPCR might be a useful predictor of mortality in patients with CCHF.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a tick-borne viral disease with a high mortality rate. Although CCHF has been widely investigated over the past decade, a review of the literature indicated no data on the prognostic capacity of the mean platelet volume-to-platelet count ratio (MPVPCR) and the red cell distribution width-to-platelet count ratio (RDWPCR) for the systemic inflammatory response in patients with CCHF. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of MPVPCR and RDWPCR on mortality in patients with CCHF.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 807 patients that were admitted to the Cumhuriyet University Hospital's Emergency Department from January 2010 to December 2018 were involved. The RDWPCR and MPVPCR were separately calculated via absolute blood red cell and platelet counts at the time of admission. Before performing receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to define the optimum cut-off values of MPVPCR and RDWPCR stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictive factors related to mortality in CCHF patients.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Values of both MPVPCR and RDWPCR were significantly lower in survivors than in non-survivors (MPVPCR: 0.20±0.23 versus 0.55±0.55, P<0.001; RDWPCR: 0.27±0.32 versus 0.77±0.77, P<0.001, respectively). The MPVPCR (odds ratio [OR], 5.95; P=0.048) was an independent predictor for the prognosis of mortality in CCHF patients. The area under the curve in the ROC curve analysis for MPVPCR was 0.876 with a cut-off of 0.21 (sensitivity 87%, specificity 76%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
At the time of admission, MPVPCR might be a useful predictor of mortality in patients with CCHF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32077849
pii: RMMJ.10393
doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10393
pmc: PMC7571435
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;25(2):321-324
pubmed: 30666932
Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Apr;6(4):203-14
pubmed: 16554245
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(2):519-27
pubmed: 26309231
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 Jun;12(6):551-4
pubmed: 16700704
Shock. 2017 Mar;47(3):323-330
pubmed: 27504801
Int J Infect Dis. 2009 May;13(3):380-6
pubmed: 18986819
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2016;69(1):51-5
pubmed: 26073733
Int J Prev Med. 2019 Jul 05;10:117
pubmed: 31367281
Antiviral Res. 2016 Feb;126:21-34
pubmed: 26695860
Int J Infect Dis. 2008 Jul;12(4):374-9
pubmed: 18063402
Rev Infect Dis. 1989 May-Jun;11 Suppl 4:S794-800
pubmed: 2749111
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12342
pubmed: 30278511
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 17;8(7):e68780
pubmed: 23874760
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 20;7(1):13720
pubmed: 29057939
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):106-108
pubmed: 28700846
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012 Sep;12(9):805-11
pubmed: 22607078
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;88:135-140
pubmed: 31442628
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14450-4
pubmed: 25339831
Hepatol Int. 2015 Jul;9(3):454-60
pubmed: 26088296
J Med Entomol. 1979 May 22;15(4):307-417
pubmed: 113533