Energy and nutrient intakes in relation to National Nutrition Recommendations in a Norwegian population-based sample: the Tromsø Study 2015-16.
adult
energy intake
food frequency questionnaire
nutrient intake
population-based studies
public health
Journal
Food & nutrition research
ISSN: 1654-661X
Titre abrégé: Food Nutr Res
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 101488795
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
06
2019
revised:
24
10
2019
accepted:
05
11
2019
entrez:
22
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
23
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
According to the Global Burden of Disease project, unhealthy diet accounts for most of the disease burden in Norway. Current recommendations on nutrient intake in Norway reflect those published in the evidence-based Nordic Nutrition Recommendations from 2012 (NNR2012). To study energy and nutrient intakes and compliance with the NNR2012 among women and men in a population-based study. A total of 15,146 participants (aged 40-99 years) completed a validated food frequency questionnaire (261 questions on food items, meals, and beverages) in the seventh survey of the Tromsø Study in 2015-16; 11,425 participants were eligible for the current analysis. Nutrient intake was estimated by a food and nutrient calculation system at the University of Oslo, Norway. We compared energy, macronutrient, and micronutrient intakes with the NNR2012. In total, 85% of the women and men were not in compliance with the maximum recommended intake of saturated fat, and 40 and 77% of women and men, respectively, were not in compliance with the lowest recommended intake of fiber. More than 30% of women and 25% of men had a relatively high probability of inadequate intake of vitamin D, and more than 10% of the men had a relatively high probability of inadequate intake of vitamin B6 and vitamin C. More than 20% of women and men had a high probability of excessive intake of niacin, and almost 40% of women had a high probability of excessive intake of vitamin A. Although most participants were in compliance with NNR2012, a large proportion of participants had higher intakes than maximum recommended for saturated fat, and lower than recommended for fiber and vitamin D.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32082100
doi: 10.29219/fnr.v63.3616
pii: 3616
pmc: PMC7007761
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Marie W. Lundblad et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry or elsewhere to conduct this study.
Références
Nutrients. 2017 Nov 27;9(12):
pubmed: 29186935
Scand J Soc Med. 1988;16(2):101-4
pubmed: 3387934
Nutrition. 2019 May;61:49-55
pubmed: 30684852
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972
pubmed: 30954305
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1306-14
pubmed: 20843863
Nutr J. 2011 May 16;10:50
pubmed: 21575177
Br J Nutr. 2011 May;105(10):1530-8
pubmed: 21272408
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Sep;24(9):1119-30
pubmed: 11033980
Nutr J. 2010 Sep 15;9:37
pubmed: 20843361
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25 Suppl 4:119-25
pubmed: 26589125
Ann Nutr Metab. 2011;59(2-4):84-95
pubmed: 22142665
Eur J Nutr. 2018 Jun;57(4):1301-1312
pubmed: 29541907
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;41(4):961-7
pubmed: 21422063
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Sep 14;12:143
pubmed: 22978749
Nutr J. 2012 Jun 11;11:40
pubmed: 22686621
Br J Nutr. 2015 Apr 28;113(8):1195-206
pubmed: 25822905
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jul 15;180(2):172-88
pubmed: 24918187
Food Nutr Res. 2013 Dec 16;57:
pubmed: 24358036
Public Health Nutr. 2011 May;14(5):860-9
pubmed: 20854722