Risk-based scoring and genetic identification for anisakids in frozen fish products from Atlantic FAO areas.
Anisakis
fish inspection
food safety
risk ranking tool
zoonotic risk
Journal
BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Feb 2020
21 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
24
01
2019
accepted:
13
02
2020
entrez:
23
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
29
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The presence of Anisakis larvae in fish represents a major public health concern. Effective risk management procedures should be applied to prevent heavily infected products from reaching the market. The aim of the study is to provide preliminary data on parasite exposure and risk classification in frozen fish products by applying a risk categorization scheme (site, abundance, density and epidemiology - SADE) and Fish Parasite Rating (FPR) method. Fish and cephalopods samples (N = 771) from 5 different FAO Atlantic areas were examined and categorized after an accurate visual inspection and a chloro-peptic digestion. In 25 out of 33 fish species parasite larvae were found. 10897 anisakids larvae were collected and identified to genus level. Molva dypterygia, Conger conger, Zeus faber and Aphanopus carbo were shown to be the most highly infected species. SADE and FPR scores were 1 and poor, respectively, for the referred species, because of the disseminated Anisakis infection and commercial rejection. SADE/FPR method showed high specificity and accuracy. The information provided in this work could be used in early warning systems for the detection of parasites in fishery products and might help fishing industries in establishing management strategies for infected stocks in terms of cost saving decisions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The presence of Anisakis larvae in fish represents a major public health concern. Effective risk management procedures should be applied to prevent heavily infected products from reaching the market. The aim of the study is to provide preliminary data on parasite exposure and risk classification in frozen fish products by applying a risk categorization scheme (site, abundance, density and epidemiology - SADE) and Fish Parasite Rating (FPR) method. Fish and cephalopods samples (N = 771) from 5 different FAO Atlantic areas were examined and categorized after an accurate visual inspection and a chloro-peptic digestion.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In 25 out of 33 fish species parasite larvae were found. 10897 anisakids larvae were collected and identified to genus level. Molva dypterygia, Conger conger, Zeus faber and Aphanopus carbo were shown to be the most highly infected species. SADE and FPR scores were 1 and poor, respectively, for the referred species, because of the disseminated Anisakis infection and commercial rejection.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
SADE/FPR method showed high specificity and accuracy. The information provided in this work could be used in early warning systems for the detection of parasites in fishery products and might help fishing industries in establishing management strategies for infected stocks in terms of cost saving decisions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32085758
doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02286-7
pii: 10.1186/s12917-020-02286-7
pmc: PMC7033913
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
65Références
J Food Prot. 2015 Apr;78(4):767-71
pubmed: 25836403
Trends Parasitol. 2012 Jan;28(1):9-15
pubmed: 22079162
Parasite. 2006 Jun;13(2):99-113
pubmed: 16800118
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013 Dec;10(12):1067-74
pubmed: 24147656
Adv Parasitol. 2008;66:47-148
pubmed: 18486689
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Feb 28;129(3):277-81
pubmed: 19162359
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Apr 2;198:1-8
pubmed: 25584776
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 13;7:43699
pubmed: 28287609
J Helminthol. 2017 Jul;91(4):422-439
pubmed: 28397641
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0203671
pubmed: 30235242
Psychometrika. 1947 Jun;12(2):153-7
pubmed: 20254758
Syst Parasitol. 2002 Mar;51(3):159-70
pubmed: 11912342
J Helminthol. 2000 Dec;74(4):361-4
pubmed: 11138027
J Parasitol. 1997 Aug;83(4):575-83
pubmed: 9267395
J Parasitol. 2014 Apr;100(2):199-214
pubmed: 24224764
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015 Nov;107(11):699-700
pubmed: 26561913
Int J Parasitol. 1986 Dec;16(6):633-40
pubmed: 3804573
Dis Aquat Organ. 2001 Jun 20;45(2):131-9
pubmed: 11463100
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Jan 31;191(3-4):276-83
pubmed: 23044250
Ital J Food Saf. 2017 Nov 10;6(4):6964
pubmed: 29564240
J Parasitol. 1997 Jun;83(3):401-16
pubmed: 9194819
Pol J Microbiol. 2005;54 Suppl:41-5
pubmed: 16457379
EuPA Open Proteom. 2014 Sep;4:140-155
pubmed: 27110489
J Food Prot. 2005 Apr;68(4):828-32
pubmed: 15830678
Vet Parasitol. 2014 Jan 17;199(1-2):59-72
pubmed: 24161261
Ital J Food Saf. 2015 Aug 25;4(4):5499
pubmed: 27800423
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012 Jun;9(6):517-21
pubmed: 22545961
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 May;17(5):27
pubmed: 28429304
J Parasitol. 2000 Apr;86(2):228-32
pubmed: 10780537
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;19(3):496-9
pubmed: 23621984