Cytoplasmic PPARγ is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with Cox-1 negative primary breast cancers.
Breast cancer
Cox-1
Cox-2
Cytoplasmic
Overall survival
PPARγ
Journal
Journal of translational medicine
ISSN: 1479-5876
Titre abrégé: J Transl Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 02 2020
21 02 2020
Historique:
received:
30
08
2019
accepted:
14
02
2020
entrez:
23
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of the nuclear receptor PPARγ, together with that of the cyclooxygenases Cox-1 and Cox-2, in breast cancer (BC) tissues and to correlate the data with several clinicobiological parameters including patient survival. In a well characterized cohort of 308 primary BC, PPARγ, Cox-1 and Cox-2 cytoplasmic and nuclear expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Correlations with clinicopathological and aggressiveness features were analyzed, as well as survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis. PPARγ was expressed in almost 58% of the samples with a predominant cytoplasmic location. Cox-1 and Cox-2 were exclusively cytoplasmic. Cytoplasmic PPARγ was inversely correlated with nuclear PPARγ and ER expression, but positively with Cox-1, Cox-2, and other high-risk markers of BC, e.g. HER2, CD133, and N-cadherin. Overall survival analysis demonstrated that cytoplasmic PPARγ had a strong correlation with poor survival in the whole cohort, and even stronger in the subgroup of patients with no Cox-1 expression where cytoplasmic PPARγ expression appeared as an independent marker of poor prognosis. In support of this cross-talk between PPARγ and Cox-1, we found that Cox-1 became a marker of good prognosis only when cytoplasmic PPARγ was expressed at high levels. Altogether, these data suggest that the relative expression of cytoplasmic PPARγ and Cox-1 may play an important role in oncogenesis and could be defined as a potential prognosis marker to identify specific high risk BC subgroups.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of the nuclear receptor PPARγ, together with that of the cyclooxygenases Cox-1 and Cox-2, in breast cancer (BC) tissues and to correlate the data with several clinicobiological parameters including patient survival.
METHODS
In a well characterized cohort of 308 primary BC, PPARγ, Cox-1 and Cox-2 cytoplasmic and nuclear expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Correlations with clinicopathological and aggressiveness features were analyzed, as well as survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS
PPARγ was expressed in almost 58% of the samples with a predominant cytoplasmic location. Cox-1 and Cox-2 were exclusively cytoplasmic. Cytoplasmic PPARγ was inversely correlated with nuclear PPARγ and ER expression, but positively with Cox-1, Cox-2, and other high-risk markers of BC, e.g. HER2, CD133, and N-cadherin. Overall survival analysis demonstrated that cytoplasmic PPARγ had a strong correlation with poor survival in the whole cohort, and even stronger in the subgroup of patients with no Cox-1 expression where cytoplasmic PPARγ expression appeared as an independent marker of poor prognosis. In support of this cross-talk between PPARγ and Cox-1, we found that Cox-1 became a marker of good prognosis only when cytoplasmic PPARγ was expressed at high levels.
CONCLUSION
Altogether, these data suggest that the relative expression of cytoplasmic PPARγ and Cox-1 may play an important role in oncogenesis and could be defined as a potential prognosis marker to identify specific high risk BC subgroups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32085795
doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02271-6
pii: 10.1186/s12967-020-02271-6
pmc: PMC7035771
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
PPAR gamma
0
PPARG protein, human
0
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
94Références
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Sep 23;5(1):66
pubmed: 31548545
Histopathology. 2005 Jan;46(1):37-42
pubmed: 15656884
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2005 Aug;73(2):103-11
pubmed: 15963707
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov;135(11):1551-9
pubmed: 19495794
Mol Cell Biol. 2011 Nov;31(21):4270-85
pubmed: 21896780
Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 Jan;12(1):69-82
pubmed: 23220503
J Cell Sci. 2010 Jan 15;123(Pt 2):192-201
pubmed: 20026644
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017 May;33(5):353-358
pubmed: 28277128
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003 Sep;86(3-5):501-7
pubmed: 14623550
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2015 Jan-Mar;9(1):46-50
pubmed: 25450819
RNA. 2014 Sep;20(9):1419-30
pubmed: 25047043
BMC Cancer. 2013 Jul 26;13:361
pubmed: 23890049
Pharmacol Res. 2005 Feb;51(2):85-94
pubmed: 15629253
Int J Oncol. 2006 Oct;29(4):1019-23
pubmed: 16964399
Int J Cancer. 2003 Jan 1;103(1):84-90
pubmed: 12455057
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 26;20(5):
pubmed: 30813617
Mol Cancer. 2015 Sep 17;14:168
pubmed: 26376791
Cancer Sci. 2010 Feb;101(2):396-402
pubmed: 19917060
Mol Cancer. 2009 Jun 02;8:30
pubmed: 19490624
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017 Mar;74(6):951-966
pubmed: 27530548
Mol Cancer Ther. 2010 Dec;9(12):3221-32
pubmed: 21159608
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2005 Jun;14(6):557-68
pubmed: 16004588
Horm Cancer. 2018 Apr;9(2):128-138
pubmed: 29363090
Int J Cancer. 2014 Feb 1;134(3):519-29
pubmed: 23852449
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2000 Feb;62(2):119-27
pubmed: 10780877
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006 Mar;13(1):233-50
pubmed: 16601291
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 20;36(1):57
pubmed: 28427429
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002 Jul;74(2):155-65
pubmed: 12186376
Transl Oncol. 2018 Oct;11(5):1090-1096
pubmed: 30007204
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Apr;150(3):511-22
pubmed: 25794775
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Apr;150(3):621-9
pubmed: 25783184
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Aug 09;14(8):16554-69
pubmed: 23939428
Mol Cancer Ther. 2006 Feb;5(2):317-28
pubmed: 16505105
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Mar 18;90(6):455-60
pubmed: 9521170
Oncol Rep. 2010 Aug;24(2):351-6
pubmed: 20596620
J Clin Invest. 2017 May 1;127(5):1873-1888
pubmed: 28394260
J Clin Pathol. 1993 Feb;46(2):189-90
pubmed: 8459046
Am J Pathol. 2011 Aug;179(2):1030-40
pubmed: 21704006
Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 15;67(8):3976-85
pubmed: 17440114
J Oncol. 2019 Sep 16;2019:7512632
pubmed: 31636668
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014 Jan 25;382(1):97-106
pubmed: 24055275
Cancer Res. 2002 Apr 15;62(8):2343-6
pubmed: 11956094
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Feb;113(3):423-34
pubmed: 18293083
J Cell Physiol. 2019 May;234(5):5683-5699
pubmed: 30341914
Lancet. 2017 Mar 18;389(10074):1134-1150
pubmed: 27865536
Arch Iran Med. 2016 Oct;19(10):680-686
pubmed: 27743431
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012 Feb;32(2):449-58
pubmed: 22155455
Mol Pharmacol. 2005 Jan;67(1):60-8
pubmed: 15475569
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov;140(11):1873-81
pubmed: 24962344
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Aug 1;9(8):3198-203
pubmed: 12912973
Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(5):616-38
pubmed: 26825466
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Sep;172:166-175
pubmed: 28684381
Int J Cancer. 2005 Sep 10;116(4):495-9
pubmed: 15818612
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Nov;16(11):2528-2542
pubmed: 29021293
Proteomics. 2012 Nov;12(22):3407-15
pubmed: 22997041