Does valence influence perceptual bias towards incongruence during binocular rivalry?
Binocular rivalry
Incongruency
Valence
Visual perception
Journal
Cognitive processing
ISSN: 1612-4790
Titre abrégé: Cogn Process
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101177984
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
07
05
2019
accepted:
05
02
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
29
9
2020
entrez:
23
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The efficient processing of complex visual environments is essential for effective functioning. In the natural environment, processing the context is as important as the processing of the target object since no object can be found in isolation. Congruent object-context associations in a visual scene facilitate object recognition, whereas incongruent associations decrease performance accuracy. Although there is a performance reduction, incongruent scenes are reported to have a perceptual bias due to the reallocation of the attentional resources towards the associated semantic conflict. Another key attribute that prepares the visual system to identify the important aspects of the environment is valence, and any visual scene can be classified into one of the three valence categories. Hence, the current study was designed to investigate how valence influences the perceptual bias towards incongruent object-context associations. An intermittent binocular rivalry task was used to measure the perceptual bias across valence categories. The results revealed a significant predominance of incongruent pictures when the associated valence was negative and neutral and remained unbiased for positive valence. We propose a valence-congruency interaction in which perceptual bias towards incongruence is greatly influenced by valence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32086660
doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00957-9
pii: 10.1007/s10339-020-00957-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
239-251Références
Alpers GW, Gerdes ABM (2007) Here is looking at you: emotional faces predominate in binocular rivalry. Emotion 7(3):495–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.495
doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.495
pubmed: 17683206
Anticevic A, Barch DM, Repovs G (2010) Resisting emotional interference: brain regions facilitating working memory performance during negative distraction. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 10(2):159–173. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.2.159
doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.2.159
pubmed: 20498341
Bar M (2003) A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 15(4):600–609
doi: 10.1162/089892903321662976
Bar M (2004) Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci 5(8):617–629. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1476
doi: 10.1038/nrn1476
pubmed: 15263892
Bar M, Aminoff E (2003) Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 38(2):347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00167-3
doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00167-3
pubmed: 12718867
Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH (2007) Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull 133(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1
pubmed: 17201568
Biederman I, Mezzanotte RJ, Rabinowitz JC (1982) Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cogn Psychol 14(2):143–177
doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90007-X
Blake R (1989) A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol Rev 96(1):145–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.145
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.145
pubmed: 2648445
Blake R (2001) A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain Mind 2(1):5–38
doi: 10.1023/A:1017925416289
Bradley B, DeFife JA, Guarnaccia C, Phifer J, Fani N, Ressler KJ, Westen D (2011) Emotion dysregulation and negative affect: association with psychiatric symptoms. J Clin Psychiatry 72(05):685–691. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.10m06409blu
doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06409blu
pubmed: 21658350
pmcid: 4605672
Bruner JS, Postman L (1949) On the perception of incongruity: a paradigm. J Pers 18(2):206–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01241.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01241.x
pubmed: 15409076
Buttafuoco A, Pedale T, Buchanan TW, Santangelo V (2018) Only “efficient” emotional stimuli affect the content of working memory during free-recollection from natural scenes. Cogn Process 19(1):125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0846-1
doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0846-1
pubmed: 29147817
Dane S, Erzurumluoglu A (2003) Sex and handedness differences in eye-hand visual reaction times in handball players. Int J Neurosci 113(7):923–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450390220367
doi: 10.1080/00207450390220367
pubmed: 12881185
Davenport JL (2007) Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory Cogn 35(3):393–401. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193280
doi: 10.3758/BF03193280
Davenport JL, Potter MC (2004) Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychol Sci 15(8):559–564
doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x
De Graef P, Christiaens D, d’Ydewalle G (1990) Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychol Res 52(4):317–329
doi: 10.1007/BF00868064
Dolan RJ (2002) Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science 298(5596):1191–1194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1076358
doi: 10.1126/science.1076358
pubmed: 12424363
Dolcos F (2006) Brain systems mediating cognitive interference by emotional distraction. J Neurosci 26(7):2072–2079. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5042-05.2006
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5042-05.2006
pubmed: 16481440
pmcid: 6674921
Dolcos F, Kragel P, Wang L, McCarthy G (2006) Role of the inferior frontal cortex in coping with distracting emotions. NeuroReport 17(15):1591–1594. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000236860.24081.be
doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000236860.24081.be
pubmed: 17001274
Fenker DB, Heipertz D, Boehler CN, Schoenfeld MA, Noesselt T, Heinze H-J, Duezel E, Hopf J-M (2010) Mandatory processing of irrelevant fearful face features in visual search. J Cogn Neurosci 22(12):2926–2938. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21340
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21340
pubmed: 19702468
Fox E, Russo R, Dutton K (2002) Attentional bias for threat: evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cogn Emot 16(3):355–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000527
doi: 10.1080/02699930143000527
pubmed: 18273395
pmcid: 2241753
Groeger Silva, Bradshaw BF (2006) Attention–memory interactions in scene perception. Spat Vis 19(1):9–19. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856806775009223
doi: 10.1163/156856806775009223
pubmed: 16411480
Henderson JM, Hollingworth A (1999) High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol 50(1):243–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
pubmed: 10074679
Hollingworth A, Henderson JM (2000) Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes. Vis Cogn 7(1–3):213–235
doi: 10.1080/135062800394775
Huang S-L, Chang Y-C, Chen Y-J (2011) Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources. Emotion 11(3):544–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022763
doi: 10.1037/a0022763
pubmed: 21517157
Iordan AD, Dolcos F (2015) Brain activity and network interactions linked to valence-related differences in the impact of emotional distraction. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv242
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv242
Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1999) Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends Cogn Sci 3(7):254–264
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7
Levelt, W. J. (1965). On binocular rivalry [Ph.D. Thesis]. Van Gorcum Assen
Loftus GR, Mackworth NH (1978) Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 4(4):565–572
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565
Mudrik L, Deouell LY, Lamy D (2011) Scene congruency biases Binocular Rivalry. Conscious Cogn 20(3):756–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.001
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.001
pubmed: 21306920
Müller VI, Habel U, Derntl B, Schneider F, Zilles K, Turetsky BI, Eickhoff SB (2011) Incongruence effects in crossmodal emotional integration. NeuroImage 54(3):2257–2266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.047
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.047
pubmed: 20974266
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
pubmed: 5146491
Pedale T, Macaluso E, Santangelo V (2019) Enhanced insular/prefrontal connectivity when resisting from emotional distraction during visual search. Brain Struct Funct 224(6):2009–2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01873-1
doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01873-1
pubmed: 31111208
pmcid: 6591190
Pitts MA, Britz J (2011) Insights from intermittent binocular rivalry and EEG. Front Hum Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00107
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00107
pubmed: 22046158
pmcid: 3202229
Preston TJ, Guo F, Das K, Giesbrecht B, Eckstein MP (2013) Neural representations of contextual guidance in visual search of real-world sciences. J Neurosci 33(18):7846–7855. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5840-12.2013
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5840-12.2013
pubmed: 23637176
pmcid: 3968772
Rémy F, Saint-Aubert L, Bacon-Macé N, Vayssière N, Barbeau E, Fabre-Thorpe M (2013) Object recognition in congruent and incongruent natural scenes: a life-span study. Vis Res 91:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.006
pubmed: 23891714
Rémy Florence, Vayssière N, Pins D, Boucart M, Fabre-Thorpe M (2014) Incongruent object/context relationships in visual scenes: where are they processed in the brain? Brain Cogn 84(1):34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.008
pubmed: 24280445
Righart R, De Gelder B (2008) Recognition of facial expressions is influenced by emotional scene gist. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 8(3):264–272. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.3.264
doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.3.264
pubmed: 18814463
Santangelo V, Di Francesco SA, Mastroberardino S, Macaluso E (2015) Parietal cortex integrates contextual and saliency signals during the encoding of natural scenes in working memory. Hum Brain Mapp 36(12):5003–5017. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22984
doi: 10.1002/hbm.22984
pubmed: 26333392
Singer N, Eapen M, Grillon C, Ungerleider LG, Hendler T (2012) Through the eyes of anxiety: dissecting threat bias via emotional-binocular rivalry. Emotion 12(5):960–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027070
doi: 10.1037/a0027070
pubmed: 22390706
pmcid: 3468657
Stirk JA, Underwood G (2007) Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes. J Vis 7(10):3. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.10.3
doi: 10.1167/7.10.3
pubmed: 17997672
von Helmholtz H, Southall JPC (1962) Helmholtz’s treatise on physiological optics. Dover Publications, London
Vuilleumier P (2005) How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends Cogn Sci 9(12):585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011
pubmed: 16289871
Vuilleumier P, Schwartz S (2001) Beware and be aware: capture of spatial attention by fear-related stimuli in neglect. NeuroReport 12(6):1119–1122. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200105080-00014
doi: 10.1097/00001756-200105080-00014
pubmed: 11338176
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scale. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6):1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
pubmed: 3397865
Wessa M, Heissler J, Schönfelder S, Kanske P (2013) Goal-directed behavior under emotional distraction is preserved by enhanced task-specific activation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8(3):305–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr098
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr098
pubmed: 22302842
Williams M, Moss S, Bradshaw J, Mattingley J (2005) Look at me, I’m smiling: visual search for threatening and nonthreatening facial expressions. Vis Cogn 12(1):29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000193
doi: 10.1080/13506280444000193
Wu C-C, Wick FA, Pomplun M (2014) Guidance of visual attention by semantic information in real-world scenes. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00054
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00054
pubmed: 25324818
pmcid: 4183094
Yiend J (2010) The effects of emotion on attention: a review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cogn Emot 24(1):3–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903205698
doi: 10.1080/02699930903205698
Yiend J, Mathews A (2001) Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures. Q J Exp Psychol A Hum Exp Psychol 54:665–681
doi: 10.1080/713755991
Zadra JR, Clore GL (2011) Emotion and perception: the role of affective information: emotion and perception. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 2(6):676–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.147
doi: 10.1002/wcs.147
pubmed: 22039565
pmcid: 3203022
Ziaei M, Samrani G, Persson J (2018) Age differences in the neural response to emotional distraction during working memory encoding. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 18(5):869–883. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0610-8
doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0610-8
pubmed: 29949112
pmcid: 6105189
Zuroff DC, Colussy SA (1986) Emotion recognition in schizophrenic and depressed inpatients. J Clin Psychol 42(3):411–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198605)42:3%3c411:AID-JCLP2270420302%3e3.0.CO;2-T
doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198605)42:3<411::AID-JCLP2270420302>3.0.CO;2-T
pubmed: 3711343