Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial.


Journal

Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 03 2020
Historique:
received: 05 09 2019
revised: 14 11 2019
accepted: 21 11 2019
pubmed: 23 2 2020
medline: 10 4 2020
entrez: 23 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Skin barrier dysfunction precedes eczema development. We tested whether daily use of emollient in the first year could prevent eczema in high-risk children. We did a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial in 12 hospitals and four primary care sites across the UK. Families were approached via antenatal or postnatal services for recruitment of term infants (at least 37 weeks' gestation) at high risk of developing eczema (ie, at least one first-degree relative with parent-reported eczema, allergic rhinitis, or asthma, diagnosed by a doctor). Term newborns with a family history of atopic disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to application of emollient daily (either Diprobase cream or DoubleBase gel) for the first year plus standard skin-care advice (emollient group) or standard skin-care advice only (control group). The randomisation schedule was created using computer-generated code (stratified by recruiting centre and number of first-degree relatives with atopic disease) and participants were assigned to groups using an internet-based randomisation system. The primary outcome was eczema at age 2 years (defined by UK working party criteria) with analysis as randomised regardless of adherence to allocation for participants with outcome data collected, and adjusting for stratification variables. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN21528841. Data collection for long-term follow-up is ongoing, but the trial is closed to recruitment. 1394 newborns were randomly assigned to study groups between Nov 19, 2014, and Nov 18, 2016; 693 were assigned to the emollient group and 701 to the control group. Adherence in the emollient group was 88% (466 of 532) at 3 months, 82% (427 of 519) at 6 months, and 74% (375 of 506) at 12 months in those with complete questionnaire data. At age 2 years, eczema was present in 139 (23%) of 598 infants with outcome data collected in the emollient group and 150 (25%) of 612 infants in the control group (adjusted relative risk 0·95 [95% CI 0·78 to 1·16], p=0·61; adjusted risk difference -1·2% [-5·9 to 3·6]). Other eczema definitions supported the results of the primary analysis. Mean number of skin infections per child in year 1 was 0·23 (SD 0·68) in the emollient group versus 0·15 (0·46) in the control group; adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·55 (95% CI 1·15 to 2·09). We found no evidence that daily emollient during the first year of life prevents eczema in high-risk children and some evidence to suggest an increased risk of skin infections. Our study shows that families with eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis should not use daily emollients to try and prevent eczema in their newborn. National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Skin barrier dysfunction precedes eczema development. We tested whether daily use of emollient in the first year could prevent eczema in high-risk children.
METHODS
We did a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial in 12 hospitals and four primary care sites across the UK. Families were approached via antenatal or postnatal services for recruitment of term infants (at least 37 weeks' gestation) at high risk of developing eczema (ie, at least one first-degree relative with parent-reported eczema, allergic rhinitis, or asthma, diagnosed by a doctor). Term newborns with a family history of atopic disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to application of emollient daily (either Diprobase cream or DoubleBase gel) for the first year plus standard skin-care advice (emollient group) or standard skin-care advice only (control group). The randomisation schedule was created using computer-generated code (stratified by recruiting centre and number of first-degree relatives with atopic disease) and participants were assigned to groups using an internet-based randomisation system. The primary outcome was eczema at age 2 years (defined by UK working party criteria) with analysis as randomised regardless of adherence to allocation for participants with outcome data collected, and adjusting for stratification variables. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN21528841. Data collection for long-term follow-up is ongoing, but the trial is closed to recruitment.
FINDINGS
1394 newborns were randomly assigned to study groups between Nov 19, 2014, and Nov 18, 2016; 693 were assigned to the emollient group and 701 to the control group. Adherence in the emollient group was 88% (466 of 532) at 3 months, 82% (427 of 519) at 6 months, and 74% (375 of 506) at 12 months in those with complete questionnaire data. At age 2 years, eczema was present in 139 (23%) of 598 infants with outcome data collected in the emollient group and 150 (25%) of 612 infants in the control group (adjusted relative risk 0·95 [95% CI 0·78 to 1·16], p=0·61; adjusted risk difference -1·2% [-5·9 to 3·6]). Other eczema definitions supported the results of the primary analysis. Mean number of skin infections per child in year 1 was 0·23 (SD 0·68) in the emollient group versus 0·15 (0·46) in the control group; adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·55 (95% CI 1·15 to 2·09).
INTERPRETATION
We found no evidence that daily emollient during the first year of life prevents eczema in high-risk children and some evidence to suggest an increased risk of skin infections. Our study shows that families with eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis should not use daily emollients to try and prevent eczema in their newborn.
FUNDING
National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32087126
pii: S0140-6736(19)32984-8
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32984-8
pmc: PMC7086156
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Emollients 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

962-972

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : CDF-2014-07-037
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Apr;135(4):930-5.e1
pubmed: 25618747
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Feb;120(2):131-137
pubmed: 29413336
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Jan;124(1):36-43
pubmed: 31622670
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Nov;23(11):1267-72
pubmed: 19508310
Clin Exp Allergy. 2020 Mar;50(3):334-342
pubmed: 31999862
Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1353-7
pubmed: 25580670
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Feb;120(2):145-151
pubmed: 29413338
Br J Dermatol. 1994 Sep;131(3):406-16
pubmed: 7918017
Nat Genet. 2007 May;39(5):650-4
pubmed: 17417636
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Oct;134(4):867-875.e1
pubmed: 25282568
Br J Dermatol. 2011 Aug;165(2):329-34
pubmed: 21564067
Clin Exp Allergy. 2015 Jan;45(1):255-64
pubmed: 25210971
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1859-1922
pubmed: 30415748
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0192443
pubmed: 29489859
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Oct;134(4):818-23
pubmed: 25282563
PLoS Med. 2018 Feb 28;15(2):e1002507
pubmed: 29489823
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):951-961
pubmed: 32087121
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Jan;135(1):164-70
pubmed: 25457149
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019 May;30(3):335-340
pubmed: 30790361
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Oct;134(4):824-830.e6
pubmed: 25282564
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1315-27
pubmed: 21991953
Allergy. 2018 Mar;73(3):696-704
pubmed: 28960336
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Dec;163(6):1333-6
pubmed: 21137118
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Jul;130(1):137-44
pubmed: 22424882
BMJ. 2019 Oct 24;367:l5882
pubmed: 31649114
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 06;2:CD012119
pubmed: 28166390
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Nov;175(5):1011-1019
pubmed: 27097823
Evid Based Child Health. 2011 Sep;6(5):1322-1339
pubmed: 22822349
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Dec;124(6):1251-8.e23
pubmed: 20004783
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Dec;169(6):1326-32
pubmed: 24024631
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Mar;141(3):964-971
pubmed: 29129583
Trials. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):343
pubmed: 28732519

Auteurs

Joanne R Chalmers (JR)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Rachel H Haines (RH)

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Lucy E Bradshaw (LE)

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Alan A Montgomery (AA)

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Kim S Thomas (KS)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Sara J Brown (SJ)

Skin Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK; Department of Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.

Matthew J Ridd (MJ)

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Sandra Lawton (S)

Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Eric L Simpson (EL)

Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Michael J Cork (MJ)

Sheffield Dermatology Research, Department of Infection and Immunity, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Tracey H Sach (TH)

Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.

Carsten Flohr (C)

Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.

Eleanor J Mitchell (EJ)

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Richard Swinden (R)

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Stella Tarr (S)

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Susan Davies-Jones (S)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Nicola Jay (N)

Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

Maeve M Kelleher (MM)

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Michael R Perkin (MR)

St George's, University of London, London, UK.

Robert J Boyle (RJ)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Hywel C Williams (HC)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: hywel.williams@nottingham.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH