Effects and cost of different strategies to eliminate hepatitis C virus transmission in Pakistan: a modelling analysis.
Journal
The Lancet. Global health
ISSN: 2214-109X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
received:
31
05
2019
revised:
07
10
2019
accepted:
06
01
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
23
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The WHO elimination strategy for hepatitis C virus advocates scaling up screening and treatment to reduce global hepatitis C incidence by 80% by 2030, but little is known about how this reduction could be achieved and the costs of doing so. We aimed to evaluate the effects and cost of different strategies to scale up screening and treatment of hepatitis C in Pakistan and determine what is required to meet WHO elimination targets for incidence. We adapted a previous model of hepatitis C virus transmission, treatment, and disease progression for Pakistan, calibrating using available data to incorporate a detailed cascade of care for hepatitis C with cost data on diagnostics and hepatitis C treatment. We modelled the effect on various outcomes and costs of alternative scenarios for scaling up screening and hepatitis C treatment in 2018-30. We calibrated the model to country-level demographic data for 1960-2015 (including population growth) and to hepatitis C seroprevalence data from a national survey in 2007-08, surveys among people who inject drugs (PWID), and hepatitis C seroprevalence trends among blood donors. The cascade of care in our model begins with diagnosis of hepatitis C infection through antibody screening and RNA confirmation. Diagnosed individuals are then referred to care and started on treatment, which can result in a sustained virological response (effective cure). We report the median and 95% uncertainty interval (UI) from 1151 modelled runs. One-time screening of 90% of the 2018 population by 2030, with 80% referral to treatment, was projected to lead to 13·8 million (95% UI 13·4-14·1) individuals being screened and 350 000 (315 000-385 000) treatments started annually, decreasing hepatitis C incidence by 26·5% (22·5-30·7) over 2018-30. Prioritised screening of high prevalence groups (PWID and adults aged ≥30 years) and rescreening (annually for PWID, otherwise every 10 years) are likely to increase the number screened and treated by 46·8% and decrease incidence by 50·8% (95% UI 46·1-55·0). Decreasing hepatitis C incidence by 80% is estimated to require a doubling of the primary screening rate, increasing referral to 90%, rescreening the general population every 5 years, and re-engaging those lost to follow-up every 5 years. This approach could cost US$8·1 billion, reducing to $3·9 billion with lowest costs for diagnostic tests and drugs, including health-care savings, and implementing a simplified treatment algorithm. Pakistan will need to invest about 9·0% of its yearly health expenditure to enable sufficient scale up in screening and treatment to achieve the WHO hepatitis C elimination target of an 80% reduction in incidence by 2030. UNITAID.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The WHO elimination strategy for hepatitis C virus advocates scaling up screening and treatment to reduce global hepatitis C incidence by 80% by 2030, but little is known about how this reduction could be achieved and the costs of doing so. We aimed to evaluate the effects and cost of different strategies to scale up screening and treatment of hepatitis C in Pakistan and determine what is required to meet WHO elimination targets for incidence.
METHODS
We adapted a previous model of hepatitis C virus transmission, treatment, and disease progression for Pakistan, calibrating using available data to incorporate a detailed cascade of care for hepatitis C with cost data on diagnostics and hepatitis C treatment. We modelled the effect on various outcomes and costs of alternative scenarios for scaling up screening and hepatitis C treatment in 2018-30. We calibrated the model to country-level demographic data for 1960-2015 (including population growth) and to hepatitis C seroprevalence data from a national survey in 2007-08, surveys among people who inject drugs (PWID), and hepatitis C seroprevalence trends among blood donors. The cascade of care in our model begins with diagnosis of hepatitis C infection through antibody screening and RNA confirmation. Diagnosed individuals are then referred to care and started on treatment, which can result in a sustained virological response (effective cure). We report the median and 95% uncertainty interval (UI) from 1151 modelled runs.
FINDINGS
One-time screening of 90% of the 2018 population by 2030, with 80% referral to treatment, was projected to lead to 13·8 million (95% UI 13·4-14·1) individuals being screened and 350 000 (315 000-385 000) treatments started annually, decreasing hepatitis C incidence by 26·5% (22·5-30·7) over 2018-30. Prioritised screening of high prevalence groups (PWID and adults aged ≥30 years) and rescreening (annually for PWID, otherwise every 10 years) are likely to increase the number screened and treated by 46·8% and decrease incidence by 50·8% (95% UI 46·1-55·0). Decreasing hepatitis C incidence by 80% is estimated to require a doubling of the primary screening rate, increasing referral to 90%, rescreening the general population every 5 years, and re-engaging those lost to follow-up every 5 years. This approach could cost US$8·1 billion, reducing to $3·9 billion with lowest costs for diagnostic tests and drugs, including health-care savings, and implementing a simplified treatment algorithm.
INTERPRETATION
Pakistan will need to invest about 9·0% of its yearly health expenditure to enable sufficient scale up in screening and treatment to achieve the WHO hepatitis C elimination target of an 80% reduction in incidence by 2030.
FUNDING
UNITAID.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32087176
pii: S2214-109X(20)30003-6
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30003-6
pmc: PMC7295205
mid: NIHMS1595158
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e440-e450Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0616-20008
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI147490
Pays : United States
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-DG-0610-10055
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI036214
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N00616X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;3(11):778-789
pubmed: 30030068
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Aug 01;17:19032
pubmed: 25095831
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 17;5(3):ofy040
pubmed: 29594179
J Viral Hepat. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 4:21-41
pubmed: 26513446
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 17;5(1):ofx252
pubmed: 29354656
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 27;12(4):e0175562
pubmed: 28448576
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Apr 15;40 Suppl 5:S276-85
pubmed: 15768335
J Hepatol. 2014 Nov;61(1 Suppl):S58-68
pubmed: 25443346
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Dec;97(6):1920-1928
pubmed: 29141707
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;47(2):550-560
pubmed: 29309592
J Viral Hepat. 2018 Jul;25(7):762-770
pubmed: 29369467
Medicina (Kaunas). 2018 Nov 05;54(5):
pubmed: 30400604
Int Health. 2020 Jan 1;12(1):19-27
pubmed: 30597008
J Hepatol. 2014 Nov;61(1 Suppl):S45-57
pubmed: 25086286
Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):571-83
pubmed: 21802134
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Sep;67(5):411-431
pubmed: 28683174
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Feb 1;91(2):102-23
pubmed: 23554523
East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16 Suppl:S15-23
pubmed: 21495584
Antiviral Res. 2015 Jul;119:89-96
pubmed: 25615583
Health Policy Plan. 2018 May 1;33(4):528-538
pubmed: 29529282
J Viral Hepat. 2006 Jan;13(1):34-41
pubmed: 16364080
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Sep 6;165(5):345-55
pubmed: 27322622
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193613
pubmed: 31074817